NetDrive - Any One Used It?
-
@Ambarishrh said:
@garak0410 said:
Looks interesting, but anything of these kind, i am always worried about the auth part. Several instances where things like dropbox lost the auth keys via third party tools.
Yes...security is foremost on my mind.
Since I have left the "all in" Microsoft world, I've expanded my horizon's somewhat and am enjoying what I get from Microsoft, Google and Amazon.
-
I almost bought NetDrive, but then I found out you can use Amazon Cloud Drive from Linux... so I've been using that instead.
-
I wouldn't use it.
From the screenshots, it allows you to map your cloud drive as a lettered drive on your Windows box. This makes your cloudy stuff vulnerable to Crypto-Locker and its variants. -
@nadnerB Owch... Nice catch.
-
@nadnerB said:
I wouldn't use it.
From the screenshots, it allows you to map your cloud drive as a lettered drive on your Windows box. This makes your cloudy stuff vulnerable to Crypto-Locker and its variants.That is going to keep coming up with all kinds of things that people do. It has been nearly a mantra of IT to "mount everything like a drive" for decades. Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
Use something like Sharepoint or Alfresco. Use the web interface instead of attaching it to WebDav (which is slightly safer then CIFS). Use actual programs (MS Office comes to mind) to open files instead of something like file explorer. These programs can directly access both Sharepoint and Alfresco without having to go through a mount. Even Confluence has an Office plugin that will allow it to directly access files stored on Confluence.
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
No question that this will take a lot of time, money, and energy to train end users on how to use these systems properly but in the long run they will be much better off. Not only is it marginally safer from a security and malware perspective but it will also be easier to use once people get used to it. Searching a document management system is so much easier to do then searching a file share. Especially if people are using tags to their full extent.
-
@dafyre said:
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
This is where application-aware storage is key. Like how Word talks to ODfB transparently. No need to install ODfB or have it talk to the OS. The OS is a point of risk here. Shared risk across applications. Remove that and things like Cryptolocker have little to nothing to attack. Storage aware applications are the future, IMHO, both because of security but moreso because of features and functionality. It is just a better, more advanced way to work with computers.
Using files like we have been is the "IT way forced on end users." It is not at all how end users would want or design storage. It was done because it was easy for the programmers and IT to think of files since we don't use applications. But end users only use applications, they shouldn't need files!
-
@coliver said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
Use something like Sharepoint or Alfresco. Use the web interface instead of attaching it to WebDav (which is slightly safer then CIFS). Use actual programs (MS Office comes to mind) to open files instead of something like file explorer. These programs can directly access both Sharepoint and Alfresco without having to go through a mount. Even Confluence has an Office plugin that will allow it to directly access files stored on Confluence.
The problem I have with this method for opening files is searching for files. Sometimes you just don't remember if a file is a Word doc or an Excel sheet. If you're searching with Word, you'll never see the Excel sheets, etc.
I understand the safety gained, but damn you do give up a lot.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Using files like we have been is the "IT way forced on end users." It is not at all how end users would want or design storage. It was done because it was easy for the programmers and IT to think of files since we don't use applications. But end users only use applications, they shouldn't need files!
Yeah I'll give you that! If I could take away drives from users, life would be a lot easier.
-
@Dashrender said:
@coliver said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
Use something like Sharepoint or Alfresco. Use the web interface instead of attaching it to WebDav (which is slightly safer then CIFS). Use actual programs (MS Office comes to mind) to open files instead of something like file explorer. These programs can directly access both Sharepoint and Alfresco without having to go through a mount. Even Confluence has an Office plugin that will allow it to directly access files stored on Confluence.
The problem I have with this method for opening files is searching for files. Sometimes you just don't remember if a file is a Word doc or an Excel sheet. If you're searching with Word, you'll never see the Excel sheets, etc.
I understand the safety gained, but damn you do give up a lot.
That could be a programmatical change though. In LibreOffice, if I am in Write, it still shows me all of my Calc Spreadsheets as well... if I click on one of those, it assumes I want it to open in Calc and does that for me.
-
@Dashrender said:
@coliver said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
Use something like Sharepoint or Alfresco. Use the web interface instead of attaching it to WebDav (which is slightly safer then CIFS). Use actual programs (MS Office comes to mind) to open files instead of something like file explorer. These programs can directly access both Sharepoint and Alfresco without having to go through a mount. Even Confluence has an Office plugin that will allow it to directly access files stored on Confluence.
The problem I have with this method for opening files is searching for files. Sometimes you just don't remember if a file is a Word doc or an Excel sheet. If you're searching with Word, you'll never see the Excel sheets, etc.
I understand the safety gained, but damn you do give up a lot.
Do you give up a lot? You're thinking about searching in the context with file explorer... what about searching via a tagged infrastructure on a document management system? That would be 1000x easier then trying to use the built in windows search.
-
@coliver said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
No question that this will take a lot of time, money, and energy to train end users on how to use these systems properly but in the long run they will be much better off. Not only is it marginally safer from a security and malware perspective but it will also be easier to use once people get used to it. Searching a document management system is so much easier to do then searching a file share. Especially if people are using tags to their full extent.
I wonder how much training it will really take. A lot of these systems that exist today are so transparent that often people do not even really realize.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Now that that is such a huge vulnerability, it's going to take time to change what is there and even longer for people to start thinking in those terms. The ship is turning, but it will take time. Lots of time.
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
For us IT folks, we know better, and would upload our Important Stuff (tm) to our online storage provider of choice...
No question that this will take a lot of time, money, and energy to train end users on how to use these systems properly but in the long run they will be much better off. Not only is it marginally safer from a security and malware perspective but it will also be easier to use once people get used to it. Searching a document management system is so much easier to do then searching a file share. Especially if people are using tags to their full extent.
I wonder how much training it will really take. A lot of these systems that exist today are so transparent that often people do not even really realize.
It depends on how heavily network mounts and shared drives are utilized. I think you'd be surprised at how change adverse a lot of end users can be even for technologies that I see as beneficial to everyone.
-
@coliver said:
It depends on how heavily network mounts and shared drives are utilized. I think you'd be surprised at how change adverse a lot of end users can be even for technologies that I see as beneficial to everyone.
But I think most users are seeing this already and it is so transparent that they do not even realize. Like on phones.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
It depends on how heavily network mounts and shared drives are utilized. I think you'd be surprised at how change adverse a lot of end users can be even for technologies that I see as beneficial to everyone.
But I think most users are seeing this already and it is so transparent that they do not even realize. Like on phones.
How do you mean? Like the Gallery type apps on phones?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@dafyre said:
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
This is where application-aware storage is key. Like how Word talks to ODfB transparently. No need to install ODfB or have it talk to the OS. The OS is a point of risk here. Shared risk across applications. Remove that and things like Cryptolocker have little to nothing to attack. Storage aware applications are the future, IMHO, both because of security but moreso because of features and functionality. It is just a better, more advanced way to work with computers.
Using files like we have been is the "IT way forced on end users." It is not at all how end users would want or design storage. It was done because it was easy for the programmers and IT to think of files since we don't use applications. But end users only use applications, they shouldn't need files!
Just thought if Owncloud has an option to integrate with Office, and found this https://forum.owncloud.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10820
And something for dropbox/google drive as well http://getdigitize.com/office-2013-how-to-add-dropbox-and-google-drive-as-a-cloud-service/
-
@dafyre said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
It depends on how heavily network mounts and shared drives are utilized. I think you'd be surprised at how change adverse a lot of end users can be even for technologies that I see as beneficial to everyone.
But I think most users are seeing this already and it is so transparent that they do not even realize. Like on phones.
How do you mean? Like the Gallery type apps on phones?
Like pretty much any app. What app on your phone uses files? Pretty much everything is handled in the apps.
-
@Ambarishrh said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@dafyre said:
(not arguing... just thinking out loud)... What are the alternatives? Using a Sync software a la ownCloud, et al? Still the same problem -- at least with ownCloud, you get File Versioning.
You could use ownCloud, et al, by just manually uploading things to the website... but would end-users actually do that?
This is where application-aware storage is key. Like how Word talks to ODfB transparently. No need to install ODfB or have it talk to the OS. The OS is a point of risk here. Shared risk across applications. Remove that and things like Cryptolocker have little to nothing to attack. Storage aware applications are the future, IMHO, both because of security but moreso because of features and functionality. It is just a better, more advanced way to work with computers.
Using files like we have been is the "IT way forced on end users." It is not at all how end users would want or design storage. It was done because it was easy for the programmers and IT to think of files since we don't use applications. But end users only use applications, they shouldn't need files!
Just thought if Owncloud has an option to integrate with Office, and found this https://forum.owncloud.org/viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10820
And something for dropbox/google drive as well http://getdigitize.com/office-2013-how-to-add-dropbox-and-google-drive-as-a-cloud-service/
That's awesome. Good to know!!
