SOHO and SMB Cloud Storage Recommendations
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
But a pricing plan like you posted earlier doesn't do that.. instead we get the feeling that now that we are bigger you feel that we suddenly make enough money to be able to afford to pay you more.
But that is exactly what is happening. You no longer need special consideration for being a "start up" and now you are a full fledged company and can pay "viable company" prices.
But we all know that that isn't always true. They've picked an arbitrary line... it might be true for some or even most, but definitely not all.
And and this point, we're just nitpicking.. I think we're pretty much on the same page now.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
Pricing that humps because the vendor adds features as the hump goes up is being deceptive in their offerings in a price list as Scott has presented it. Instead of realizing I'm getting extra stuff (do I even want it, Access for example) the simple list looks like just because I'm a big boy means I get punished.
So you feel that it is deceptive in a non-useful way to the vendor? I'm unsure what you feel is deceptive here. Where do you feel there is deception?
You're presentation doesn't indicate there are more features for the higher levels of users (but that might be only YOUR presentation, and not the one actually on the website like Microsoft's presentation of O365 - which clearly shows the additions per level of purchase.
I get that. It's rare (but still correct) to call it deceptive in when it is in your favour. Like telling you I forget your birthday to cover for sneakily getting you a rainbow and unicorn decorated cake without you guessing.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
But a pricing plan like you posted earlier doesn't do that.. instead we get the feeling that now that we are bigger you feel that we suddenly make enough money to be able to afford to pay you more.
But that is exactly what is happening. You no longer need special consideration for being a "start up" and now you are a full fledged company and can pay "viable company" prices.
But we all know that that isn't always true. They've picked an arbitrary line... it might be true for some or even most, but definitely not all.
And and this point, we're just nitpicking.. I think we're pretty much on the same page now.
Yes, they have to pick an indicator. There is no direct means for them to put a metric on "viable." But they make it very public and it is a sensible number. I am sure that tons of thought went into which numbers work for which size organizations.
-
@scottalanmiller Am I getting a unicorn and rainbows cake for my birthday? You kinda volunteered right there...
-
@Dashrender said:
eh? not for more than 10 users? O365 example is clearly more than 10 users.
My initial point was that whilst it is common for software houses to offer special products or pricing for less than 10 users, Microsoft is unusual in doing a similar thing for 300 users. That was it. My one and only point!
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Are you saying that Microsoft is only "wrong" because of the exact number of users in question and not because of the general theory?
I have no opinion on what Microsoft are doing. I don't think they're wrong or right. They're the marketing experts. All I am pointing out is that whilst it is common for software houses to offer special products or pricing for less than 10 users, Microsoft is unusual in doing a similar thing for 300 users. Not wrong, not right, just unusual.
Indeed, this is a relatively recent thing. They initially had Small Business which was for up to 25 users, and Enterprise which was for everyone else. They then introduced Mid-Size, which was for between 25 and 300 (and I didn't get this either, at the time). They then effectively merged Small Business and Mid-Size and ended up with the 300 limit. I am sure this will be revamped again in due course.
-
Can I have a unicorn as well please.
-
Anyway Scott, I think number of users is the crucial factor, you think that is irrelevant and number of employees is a bigger factor. I see this as a simple difference of opinion. You think I'm attacking your character or personal traits. That wasn't ever my intention and I apologise that that is how I came across.
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
@Dashrender said:
eh? not for more than 10 users? O365 example is clearly more than 10 users.
My initial point was that whilst it is common for software houses to offer special products or pricing for less than 10 users, Microsoft is unusual in doing a similar thing for 300 users. That was it. My one and only point!
Okay, if the question was not one of "they shouldn't do this" which is how it came across and only question of "why is MS at 300 vs other companies at 10" that's very different and really just about the kind of software that it is.
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
@Dashrender said:
eh? not for more than 10 users? O365 example is clearly more than 10 users.
My initial point was that whilst it is common for software houses to offer special products or pricing for less than 10 users, Microsoft is unusual in doing a similar thing for 300 users. That was it. My one and only point!
Awww.. and are you saying this when looking at Scott's suggested reasoning - at 300 you're no longer in the kiddy pool as far as being a company, you're now playing with the big dogs?
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Are you saying that Microsoft is only "wrong" because of the exact number of users in question and not because of the general theory?
I have no opinion on what Microsoft are doing. I don't think they're wrong or right. They're the marketing experts. All I am pointing out is that whilst it is common for software houses to offer special products or pricing for less than 10 users, Microsoft is unusual in doing a similar thing for 300 users. Not wrong, not right, just unusual.
Indeed, this is a relatively recent thing. They initially had Small Business which was for up to 25 users, and Enterprise which was for everyone else. They then introduced Mid-Size, which was for between 25 and 300 (and I didn't get this either, at the time). They then effectively merged Small Business and Mid-Size and ended up with the 300 limit. I am sure this will be revamped again in due course.
SBS was capped at 75 users, not 25. They did come out with a product (is it Essentials?) that's capped at 25 now?
While I liked the idea of the Mid-sized software, ultimately the limitations weren't worth the cost savings. -
Not sure of the Essentials cap. Foundation is capped at 15, I believe.
-
@Dashrender said:
@Carnival-Boy said:
Indeed, this is a relatively recent thing. They initially had Small Business which was for up to 25 users, and Enterprise which was for everyone else. They then introduced Mid-Size, which was for between 25 and 300 (and I didn't get this either, at the time). They then effectively merged Small Business and Mid-Size and ended up with the 300 limit. I am sure this will be revamped again in due course.
SBS was capped at 75 users, not 25. They did come out with a product (is it Essentials?) that's capped at 25 now?
I think it was originally called Small Business Essentials, but they they renamed it to just Small Business (there was also a Small Business Premium). It was capped at 25.
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
@Dashrender said:
@Carnival-Boy said:
Indeed, this is a relatively recent thing. They initially had Small Business which was for up to 25 users, and Enterprise which was for everyone else. They then introduced Mid-Size, which was for between 25 and 300 (and I didn't get this either, at the time). They then effectively merged Small Business and Mid-Size and ended up with the 300 limit. I am sure this will be revamped again in due course.
SBS was capped at 75 users, not 25. They did come out with a product (is it Essentials?) that's capped at 25 now?
I think it was originally called Small Business Essentials, but they they renamed it to just Small Business (there was also a Small Business Premium). It was capped at 25.
Aww.. I was referring to server products, not O365.. my bad.
-
In case anyone wonders what is added when you move from the midsize plan to the enterprise plan, you get MS Access (including hosting for it), Video Hosting (like Corporate YouTube), monthly rather than annual payment plans, plus these things:
-
For us the additional features of O365 E3 over O365 Small Business Premium don't mean anything. We'd solely be buying a different level because they required it.
We run different than most business we don't push out technology just because we can or because we have it (doesn't matter if free or paid for) it has to have a valid business reason. Otherwise we are wasting time installing it, managing it and troubleshooting it for no gain. We have Yammer now but don't use it. We would not push out Lync/Skype, Access. Etc. We already have sharepoint internally and would not be moving it to o365. This is why we are going to just get Exchange Hosted Plan 2.
-
I currently have a small business plan for myself. I wanted a bit of experience with it - but really, once it's setup, unless I want to mess around with Sharepoint, there isn't anything much to it.
I can't see the point in upgrading to an E1 account, the added things Scott mentioned aren't things I need.
-
@Dashrender said:
I can't see the point in upgrading to an E1 account, the added things Scott mentioned aren't things I need.
E1 would be less (and cheaper.) People are discussing E3 here (there is no E2, I checked.)
-
Isn't E1 $8/month? I currently pay $5/month
-
@Dashrender said:
Isn't E1 $8/month? I currently pay $5/month
Oh, you have that plan? What are you getting that is better than the $4 enterprise plan?
