Healthcare Sharing Networks - Have You Used One?
-
If you have a group health insurance you have to wait a bit here. To get approval then to have the surgery etc. But compared to some countries it's not too bad at all.
Being willing to pay cash for anything no matter what country you are in tends to take that wait time down to nothing.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
I was speaking to someone who is very well paid in the auto industry in Germany. It's the only reason I was willing to put it here.
The problem that people often face is that they see a "wait" in their own country and hear rumours that the US has no wait and say that they have a long wait (everyone has some) and don't realize that it is less than in the US (and that they get far better healthcare quality.) It's all relative. They probably wait long compared to France, but not compared to the US.
In England they complain about their healthcare all of the time. It's awful.... unless you compare to the US, then it is great.
I'm not sure who is waiting in the US (assuming they have insurance that covers it). My wife got a diagnosis and had surgery to resolve that diagnosis within 5 days. I'm sure if it would have been needed sooner than that it would have happened faster than that. So what delay do we have for the insured in the US?
Five days is a delay. What's the delay in Germany? You'd need a lot of numbers. In the US, for the insured, there are often delays. Rarely tragic ones, but it is not instant. We are talking about non-emergency surgery, of course.
Part of the speed is getting diagnosis faster. We've dealt with this in France that was many times faster and cheaper than the US is able to do at all. Surgeries I've not done myself, but talking to people all over Europe everyone has confirmed that it is very and efficient everywhere.
-
@Minion-Queen said:
If you have a group health insurance you have to wait a bit here. To get approval then to have the surgery etc. But compared to some countries it's not too bad at all.
Part of the trick in the US is to wait until after all of the delays to start the "timer" on how long it takes.
-
Sure the delay is probably equally due to the OR being full as to any other issues.
Her case was semi emergent. I know part of the delay was OR space and another was getting a physical from her GP for anesthesia.
-
From what little I've seen, seeing a GP in Europe takes minutes (more or less literally.) In the US I could go to an Urgent Care for that, but timing it myself that takes many times as long. It's all the little things that add up. Seeing your GP is a 30 minute exercise, not a three hour one. Hitting the pharmacy is fifteen minutes, not an hour or two. Prescriptions are correct not life threatening - a pretty big deal (studies show doctors kill people at an alarming rate in the US.)
-
What is an example of a non emergent thing someone would have done that would be covered?
Obviously cancer or origin transplant can't wait.
I have a deviated septum, probably the main reason I rarely breath through my nose. I could have it fixed, but I have no idea if insurance would cover it. Do you think this would be covered by government healthcare in Europe?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
From what little I've seen, seeing a GP in Europe takes minutes (more or less literally.) In the US I could go to an Urgent Care for that, but timing it myself that takes many times as long. It's all the little things that add up. Seeing your GP is a 30 minute exercise, not a three hour one. Hitting the pharmacy is fifteen minutes, not an hour or two. Prescriptions are correct not life threatening - a pretty big deal (studies show doctors kill people at an alarming rate in the US.)
Yeah, well considering that many people in the US go to the doctor for every little thing - the GP's are totally backed up, and you're right, it can take days to get in - or go Urgent care and still likely spend hours waiting - I know I have. I am truly discussed by US Emergency rooms - short of you actually dying, they could care less about treating you in a timely manner. I had a pretty bad leg laceration a few years ago... went to the ER, 3.5 hours later I finally left. The waiting room had 1 other person in it, and otherwise was dead. It was ridiculous. OH and then I got the bill. 10 stitches and a few shots costs me $850
-
@Dashrender said:
I have a deviated septum, probably the main reason I rarely breath through my nose. I could have it fixed, but I have no idea if insurance would cover it. Do you think this would be covered by government healthcare in Europe?
I would certainly expect that to be covered in Europe.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
From what little I've seen, seeing a GP in Europe takes minutes (more or less literally.) In the US I could go to an Urgent Care for that, but timing it myself that takes many times as long. It's all the little things that add up. Seeing your GP is a 30 minute exercise, not a three hour one. Hitting the pharmacy is fifteen minutes, not an hour or two. Prescriptions are correct not life threatening - a pretty big deal (studies show doctors kill people at an alarming rate in the US.)
Yeah, well considering that many people in the US go to the doctor for every little thing - the GP's are totally backed up, and you're right, it can take days to get in - or go Urgent care and still likely spend hours waiting - I know I have. I am truly discussed by US Emergency rooms - short of you actually dying, they could care less about treating you in a timely manner. I had a pretty bad leg laceration a few years ago... went to the ER, 3.5 hours later I finally left. The waiting room had 1 other person in it, and otherwise was dead. It was ridiculous. OH and then I got the bill. 10 stitches and a few shots costs me $850
Actually in Europe I think that they go to the GP more often than in the US. They just have more doctors seeing people faster. I know that Japan has a huge culture of "go see the doctor early and often" and they've found that, overall, it reduces the wait times in the system because they catch more things, sooner when they have more chances to fix them easily.
-
@Dashrender said:
10 stitches and a few shots costs me $850
That's the other thing, you never actually get covered by insurance. We've had insurance for years, yet always end up paying more out of pocket than if we were in another country without insurance. How does that work?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Actually in Europe I think that they go to the GP more often than in the US. They just have more doctors seeing people faster. I know that Japan has a huge culture of "go see the doctor early and often" and they've found that, overall, it reduces the wait times in the system because they catch more things, sooner when they have more chances to fix them easily.
Japan has its own issues with their healthcare system, but all in all it is so far removed from the crap we have here that the issues are not even comparable.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
10 stitches and a few shots costs me $850
That's the other thing, you never actually get covered by insurance. We've had insurance for years, yet always end up paying more out of pocket than if we were in another country without insurance. How does that work?
Well, I'm on an high deductable, I would have expected to pay around 20% if I had HMO coverage.
-
No one's is perfect.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
10 stitches and a few shots costs me $850
That's the other thing, you never actually get covered by insurance. We've had insurance for years, yet always end up paying more out of pocket than if we were in another country without insurance. How does that work?
Well, I'm on an HA, I would have expected to pay around 20% if I had HMO coverage.
Considering that even the cheapest US insurance is many times the cost of the healthcare taxes in other countries that cover everything... doesn't that seem high?
-
I'll agree that our healthcare costs are out of control - but I have to stop and ask myself why is that? Where does that money go?
I've asked where the greatest portions of our expenses are for our smallish medical practice (we net around 12 Million a year). The top three things are salaries, insurance for staff, malpractice insurance. If I recall this takes around 60-70% of net revenue.
-
@Dashrender said:
I'll agree that our healthcare costs are out of control - but I have to stop and ask myself why is that? Where does that money go?
Private companies that siphon it off. Tons goes to the unnecessary insurance business. That is a HUGE business for a reason. A bit goes to the government. Tons goes to the pharmaceutical industry. Lots goes to the doctor's own insurance as the system encourages lawsuits like crazy. Tons goes to billing overhead. The US system needs 20 people for every tiny transaction. The system is very complicated making it expensive and extremely corrupt making it SO much more expensive.
-
@Dashrender said:
I've asked where the greatest portions of our expenses are for our smallish medical practice (we net around 12 Million a year). The top three things are salaries, insurance for staff, malpractice insurance. If I recall this takes around 60-70% of net revenue.
And that is a small part of the picture. Most of the money is gone long before a doctor's office gets anything.
-
People talk about other countries and how they are so corrupt and in the US people say that things are not corrupt and that corruption does not affect them day to day - which is insane. I'm convinced that corruption has become so common and insidious that Americans have stopped identifying it as something bad. At least in Italy, for example, people still realize that there is big time corruption.
-
Money gets soaked up by the insurance industry and it's a complete waste. People indirectly profiting & betting on others being sick disgusts me.
-
OH yeah.. the insurance companies themselves are definitely where a huge portion of the money goes.
