Experian Credit Firm Hacked
-
Hackers steal T-Mobile data on 15 million US customers
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-34420879T-Mobile users affected as giant US credit reporting firm loses private data of millions of users.
-
This is becoming tiresome to keep hearing about time and again. Being as big as these companies are, and more so that Experian a credit agency can't secure their systems is just insane. And to top it off as a 'forgive me plea' their offering 2 years "Credit Monitoring and Identity Resolution services". Which if you add that on-top of recent BlueCross Blue Shield data breach affecting 10 Million it's a complete pissing pot for the consumers.
Like what the hell, 15 million people for T-Mobile but that entire agency (Experian) has data on everyone who's ever even considered a credit card. Seriously we need to start lining up the people who refuse to security check and update their systems on a schedule and just waterboard them.
The firm said there "is no evidence that the data has been used inappropriately".
How the hell could they possibly know?!
-
Ugh.... one more thing to have to watch for...
-
Yes, that this is Experian, a credit agency, is a really big deal. The kind of data that they hold and the conditions under which they collect it makes them nearly a government agency as it is. The standards to which they need to be held are insanely high.
-
F[moderated], that's me - switched in 2014.
Here's the site to get your 2 years of credit monitoring:
http://www.protectmyid.com/default.aspx -
Sad that you only get two years of credit monitoring.... considering it was a credit firm that was hacked!!
-
More importantly, why would anyone who has this data immediately use it, just wait 2 years (after the free monitoring has expired) and then start opening up credit cards, or buy and sell property etc.
After 2 years no one is going to remember. The credit monitoring should be for Life (at a minimum 20 years)
-
@DustinB3403 said:
More importantly, why would anyone who has this data immediately use it, just wait 2 years (after the free monitoring has expired) and then start opening up credit cards, or buy and sell property etc.
After 2 years no one is going to remember. The credit monitoring should be for Life (at a minimum 20 years)
And all they have to do is shut Experian down as racketeering and the problem solves itself. The problems with identity theft in the US ARE the credit agencies recording incorrect information, not the identify theft itself.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
Sad that you only get two years of credit monitoring.... considering it was a credit firm that was hacked!!
Agreed - I hope the FTC fines the hell out of them:
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/court-says-ftc-can-slap-companies-getting-hacked/ -
@Nic said:
F[moderated], that's me - switched in 2014.
Here's the site to get your 2 years of credit monitoring:
http://www.protectmyid.com/default.aspxWhen Sony was hacked they offered a lot more then 2 years. I want to say it was in the 5-10 year range. I still get monitoring emails from the credit tacker that they hired for everyone.
-
Fines don't correct the problem, its seen as the cost of doing business for these places.
Start fire Squading the people that allow these security gaps and then things will change, or Hit the stock directly by forcing them out of the market and maybe they'll understand that doing risky things in the name of making money isn't working.
-
@Nic said:
@scottalanmiller said:
Sad that you only get two years of credit monitoring.... considering it was a credit firm that was hacked!!
Agreed - I hope the FTC fines the hell out of them:
http://www.wired.com/2015/08/court-says-ftc-can-slap-companies-getting-hacked/Hopefully. but if only they should shut them down. They are evil, evil businesses.
-
@DustinB3403 said:
Fines don't correct the problem, its seen as the cost of doing business for these places.
Start fire Squading the people that allow these security gaps and then things will change, or Hit the stock directly by forcing them out of the market and maybe they'll understand that doing risky things in the name of making money isn't working.
Isn't the whole point that doing risky things in the name of making money works extremely well? Even if we implement fines and punishable offences they are still going to be making money.
-
@coliver said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Fines don't correct the problem, its seen as the cost of doing business for these places.
Start fire Squading the people that allow these security gaps and then things will change, or Hit the stock directly by forcing them out of the market and maybe they'll understand that doing risky things in the name of making money isn't working.
Isn't the whole point that doing risky things in the name of making money works extremely well? Even if we implement fines and punishable offences they are still going to be making money.
The entire business model of a credit agency is to put people at risk to make money.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@coliver said:
@DustinB3403 said:
Fines don't correct the problem, its seen as the cost of doing business for these places.
Start fire Squading the people that allow these security gaps and then things will change, or Hit the stock directly by forcing them out of the market and maybe they'll understand that doing risky things in the name of making money isn't working.
Isn't the whole point that doing risky things in the name of making money works extremely well? Even if we implement fines and punishable offences they are still going to be making money.
The entire business model of a credit agency is to put people at risk to make money.
Right, that's what I was getting at.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
The entire business model of a credit agency is to put people at risk to make money.
Explain that one to me, please.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The entire business model of a credit agency is to put people at risk to make money.
Explain that one to me, please.
Their business is collected unauthorized and unverified private information about people and selling it. Since they don't have authorization and don't verify whom they are collecting information about or that the information is correct they create a ton of risk, but the risk is to people who are not their customers - you, me and other normal people. They generate and sell potentially damaging information about third parties without their consent and often without their knowledge.
-
Offering credit monitoring to affected customers is really like putting band aid on ruptured artery. Credit monitoring agencies are slow to detect anything, and can't prevent anything fraudulent. I had one year after Home Depot or Target breach, it took them over a month to notify me that I opened new credit card, or there was no reaction at all when additional credit cards were compromised.
What they need to offer is free credit freeze for life. -
Without the credit agencies, how do other countries do credit checks?
-
@Dashrender said:
Without the credit agencies, how do other countries do credit checks?
My country of origin, Poland, has credit agencies. I wasn't really aware of the fact, as I have never applied there for a credit. One thing that differentiate it from US credit agencies is that it's impossible to get a credit without permanent job. Here, anybody with decent credit score can at least get a credit card - I don't know about other loans, but I expect that with the exception of mortgage, nobody is really asking for proof of income or employment.
