@Dashrender said:

@travisdh1 said:

@mlnews said:

HPE (the company we used to call HP) has teamed up with Microsoft to deliver a single chassis, four node Azure cluster that you can deploy in your own datacenter. Using VSAN technology, but within a single chassis, the four node cluster in a box lets you fully replicate the Azure ecosystem on premises so that you can seamlessly move workloads between your own premises and the Azure public cloud. Trevor Potts of The Register reports on this interesting new offering.

HPE IE: We changed the name and STILL, just don't get it. Ref: "The Azure in a can 250 is a 2U chassis containing 4 nodes lashed together into a hyper-converged cluster using HP's StoreVirtual software." Let's go IPOD instead of Scale Computing. sigh

Why do you assume IPOD? can't you have replicated data within the cluster just like Scale's systems?

It's a single 2u chasis with 4 compute nodes. How is that not IPOD?

@mlnews said:

HPE (the company we used to call HP) has teamed up with Microsoft to deliver a single chassis, four node Azure cluster that you can deploy in your own datacenter. Using VSAN technology, but within a single chassis, the four node cluster in a box lets you fully replicate the Azure ecosystem on premises so that you can seamlessly move workloads between your own premises and the Azure public cloud. Trevor Potts of The Register reports on this interesting new offering.

HPE IE: We changed the name and STILL, just don't get it. Ref: "The Azure in a can 250 is a 2U chassis containing 4 nodes lashed together into a hyper-converged cluster using HP's StoreVirtual software." Let's go IPOD instead doing it right like Scale Computing. sigh

@scottalanmiller Why, oh why, did I go look at that thread.

Family Guy, because Stewie.

Haven't had cable for ~3 years now, so assume all opinions are old and uniformed.

@dafyre said:

@Dashrender said:

NOOOOOOooooo -- blip

Fixed that for you.

I HAVE THE POWER!!! (Whoever gave it to me went straight to the loony house.)

@anonymous said:

@DustinB3403 Sorry, I mean for XenServer.....

You should have set a management interface during the setup stages. Point a web browser at that IP address. If not, you'll need to login using a local console as the root user, and from that change the settings via the menu system provided.

Note that you only configure the management interface. None of the other interfaces will be configured on XenServer itself.

Assuming this is for a server (what CentOS is generally used for), try starting at techmint

Apparently I'm trolling mangolassi.it while waiting for downloads to finish, equipment to arrive, and people to go home so I can turn the internet off for a bit.

@Dashrender said:

@travisdh1 said:

@Dashrender said:

@dafyre said:

@Dashrender said:

I have two VM hosts currently, but only one has the free space to take this as a P2V. The software on it isn't supported anymore, and can't be upgraded. It's more or less just a read only type situation.

The last time I kicked off a P2V to took 4 days and eventually failed because we had a power outage right at the end.

ROFL.... 98.... 99%.... blip 1....2.....

sigh - I hate you

Who here hasn't been there, done that?

the power outage or hating @dafyre ?

Yes

@Dashrender said:

@dafyre said:

@Dashrender said:

I have two VM hosts currently, but only one has the free space to take this as a P2V. The software on it isn't supported anymore, and can't be upgraded. It's more or less just a read only type situation.

The last time I kicked off a P2V to took 4 days and eventually failed because we had a power outage right at the end.

ROFL.... 98.... 99%.... blip 1....2.....

sigh - I hate you

Who here hasn't been there, done that?

@Dashrender said:

@dafyre said:

@Dashrender said:

@dafyre said:

@Dashrender Never heard of it.... runs off to read

I've been using it for at least 2 years, if not more like 4.

Does it work well?

It does find things from time to time. I will have to do double scans for the next few times, once with Clam and again with Defender Offline and see if they show different things - though now that i think about that.. that won't work.. as the first AV should get rid of any badies on there.

If you do it a number of times, reversing which one you use first, it would be an indication if one is missing things.

@scottalanmiller said:

@travisdh1 said:

@coliver said:

@travisdh1 said:

@BRRABill said:

@wrx7m said:

I didn't know you could go in whatever pattern. I always filled from 0-x

I always thought you had to do that as well.

And even though it always worked with gaps, wondered if it would cause issues.

The only problems random drive placement may cause is when replacing failed drives, by the person pulling the wrong drive..... which shouldn't be an issue, you have documentation on where each drive is, right? RIGHT?

Most alerts I get tell me which bay the drive is in. Not sure if that is the same on Dell servers?

On the server with a real RAID adapter it'll tell me, but my software based RAIDs generally aren't so nice because they don't know.

I guess if you put them in one at a time and set them up, you'd know then.

Bet you'd never guess that I've about bit myself doing this a number of times.

@coliver said:

@travisdh1 said:

@BRRABill said:

@wrx7m said:

I didn't know you could go in whatever pattern. I always filled from 0-x

I always thought you had to do that as well.

And even though it always worked with gaps, wondered if it would cause issues.

The only problems random drive placement may cause is when replacing failed drives, by the person pulling the wrong drive..... which shouldn't be an issue, you have documentation on where each drive is, right? RIGHT?

Most alerts I get tell me which bay the drive is in. Not sure if that is the same on Dell servers?

On the server with a real RAID adapter it'll tell me, but my software based RAIDs generally aren't so nice because they don't know.

@BRRABill said:

@wrx7m said:

I didn't know you could go in whatever pattern. I always filled from 0-x

I always thought you had to do that as well.

And even though it always worked with gaps, wondered if it would cause issues.

The only problems random drive placement may cause is when replacing failed drives, by the person pulling the wrong drive..... which shouldn't be an issue, you have documentation on where each drive is, right? RIGHT?

You mean nobody has a PXE boot to scanner option setup? What are we coming to? Actually, I'm guessing by the time we're considering an off-line scan it's past time to nuke-it-from-orbit.

@Dashrender said:

@scottalanmiller said:

More or less you are asking for headphones that are like the universal translator of Star Trek. It's a neat idea and, in theory, Google can do this. However the processing power needed to do this in real time is immense and could not be put into headphones yet. As a concept, yes it can be done. In a practical sense, it cannot be done yet.

I think Skype is doing this is real, or very near real time right now.

Microsoft and Google are known to be working on it and have real-time translation in testing. I'd be very surprised if Apple is not also working on it. Making it available in headphones rather than large server clusters? No.

@Dashrender I haven't weighed it, but I'd guess ~15 to 20 lb. You can tell that things are in the vest, but you'd never guess how much or what.

Edit: Yes, requires sturdy shoulders.

@scottalanmiller said:

Well we had a major shopping fail. Turns out that today is the Feast of the Epiphany and this is a Greek Orthodox country. Nothing open. Nothing. Anywhere. Not even grocery stores.

Any truck stops around? That's the only place I can think of around here that's open 24/7/365 anyway.

@travisdh1 said:

I could wish for 512 bit where it's available, but 256-bit ECCDH and Salsa20 + Poly1305 should be all right. I know Steve Gibson is using NaCl and ECCDH in his SQRL protocol, so should be ok. So long as implementation isn't funky, it should be good.

Some odd seeming results for me as well. This is between the two locations here.

iperf over ZeroTier
*pm7:~# iperf -c 10.147.17.117

Client connecting to 10.147.17.117, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 35.2 KByte (default)

[ 3] local 10.147.17.239 port 55229 connected with 10.147.17.117 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.1 sec 11.1 MBytes 9.21 Mbits/sec
pm7:~# iperf -c 10.147.17.117

Client connecting to 10.147.17.117, TCP port 5001
TCP window size: 35.2 KByte (default)

[ 3] local 10.147.17.239 port 55231 connected with 10.147.17.117 port 5001
[ ID] Interval Transfer Bandwidth
[ 3] 0.0-10.2 sec 13.2 MBytes 10.9 Mbits/sec*

ZertoTier Network Traceroute
pm7:~# traceroute 10.147.17.117
traceroute to 10.147.17.117 (10.147.17.117), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 10.147.17.117 (10.147.17.117) 105.785 ms 106.404 ms 106.404 ms

traceroute between the two external networks
@virt2:~# traceroute ???????.poweredbyclear.com
traceroute to brouter2.poweredbyclear.com (24.166.55.233), 30 hops max, 60 byte packets
1 192.168.4.5 (192.168.4.5) 0.746 ms 1.035 ms 1.341 ms
2 oh-71-51-112-1.dhcp.embarqhsd.net (71.51.112.1) 33.373 ms 35.036 ms 36.967 ms
3 mnfd-agw1.inet.qwest.net (75.160.216.17) 38.446 ms 40.185 ms 42.587 ms
4 chp-brdr-04.inet.qwest.net (67.14.8.238) 66.026 ms 68.712 ms 70.119 ms
5 206.111.2.153.ptr.us.xo.net (206.111.2.153) 70.872 ms 73.320 ms 75.035 ms
6 207.88.15.89.ptr.us.xo.net (207.88.15.89) 77.473 ms 49.607 ms 53.741 ms
7 216.1.94.146 (216.1.94.146) 55.634 ms 57.847 ms 59.770 ms
8 bu-ether39.chcgildt87w-bcr00.tbone.rr.com (66.109.1.67) 68.413 ms bu-ether19.chcgildt87w-bcr00.tbone.rr.com (107.14.17.193) 65.995 ms bu-ether39.chcgildt87w-bcr00.tbone.rr.com (66.109.1.67) 70.655 ms
9 bu-ether11.chctilwc00w-bcr00.tbone.rr.com (66.109.6.21) 72.059 ms 74.765 ms 77.680 ms
10 be1.clmkohpe01r.midwest.rr.com (107.14.19.17) 85.908 ms 89.504 ms be3.clmkohpe01r.midwest.rr.com (107.14.19.61) 90.992 ms
11 be1.pltsohae01r.midwest.rr.com (65.29.1.29) 100.139 ms 102.326 ms 107.417 ms
12 tge9-1.mlbgoh0202h.midwest.rr.com (24.33.101.101) 68.140 ms 67.154 ms 69.541 ms
13 tge18-10.mlbgoh0201m.midwest.rr.com (24.164.100.6) 71.648 ms 74.098 ms 86.917 ms

So far nothing I can see should be getting that sort of speed, unless some major compression is happening somewhere. In which case I'm going to shoot for that xrdp setup.

"What encryption algorithms are used?
ZeroTier currently uses 256-bit Curve25519 elliptic curve Diffie-Hellman for shared key agreement and Ed25519 for elliptic curve signatures. 256-bit Salsa20 with Poly1305 authentication is used to encrypt traffic in transit. The construction and use of these algorithms is identical to the well-regarded NaCl cryptographic library."

I could wish for 512 bit where it's available, but 256-bit ECCDH and Salsa20 + Poly1305 should be all right. I know Steve Gibson is using NaCl and ECCDH in his SQRL protocol, so should be ok. So long as implementation isn't funky, it should be good.