@DustinB3403 said in Xen Orchestra new design:
@hobbit666 said in Xen Orchestra new design:
@DustinB3403 said in Xen Orchestra new design:
@hobbit666 Do you have the update script?
I'm assuming you're on the "stable" branch.Ur and Ur
Home time so will check tomorrow and off top of my head no to the update script.What does that mean?
I would guess:
Your right, Your Right
I am going home so I will check tomorrow and no I have not been using the update script.
Yes if you installed gnome, it probably installed gnome-boxes which is an application to manage vms so that's why it installed libvirt.
After some further testing I am beginning to think that the problem didn't have anything to do with the vnic's, though.
Yeah, probably nothing to do with the outage, hope you find the true problem.
@FATeknollogee said in Installing a Starwind SAN on Windows Server 2012 R2:
Paging @KOOLER Will the performance of the appliances be as good or better than the native windows install?
It must be at least as good, why release an inferior product.
@nvila what @coliver says is right, we really can't give you an estimate of how much time someone would take to fix an unknown error.
I am going to have to deploy 30 Linux desktops, I was actually thinking on just using Clonezilla SE and deploying the image that way. Just wanted to check with the community if this would be the most appropiate way.
https://docs.ansible.com/ They separate both in the docs.
Guess I'll try setting the bridge with nmtui to check how it works.
@scottalanmiller said in Sanity check - DNS Filtering on WAN:
@Breffni-Potter said in Sanity check - DNS Filtering on WAN:
Let's make it clear, this is assuming no corporate management or endpoint on the devices. The only place you are allowed to make changes is the LAN or WAN. Not the client machines.
Essentially nothing that you can do, then. Whitelisting is the only reliable option.
@Breffni-Potter I've used your proposed setup and it does work, especially for regular users.
Egress filtering, only ports 80 and 443 were enabled for users all other needed ports where only enabled per specific request and of course port 53 was only open for my internal dns server. The filtering service provides the ability for disabling Proxy/Anonymizer sites so that basically takes care of 99% of the users trying to bypass your content filtering.
Of course technical users if truly motivated will bypass the solution tunneling through 80 or 443.
You could check out and try either one of these: twilio, Nexmo, Plivo , Bandwidth. Each one could be easily integrated into your app since they provide well documented APIs in order to send and recevice SMS worldwide.
Yeah Elastix 5 is pretty much 3CX free, they are not even supporting it themselves.
3CX South America will assume the commercial operations surrounding Elastix including support, sales & distribution of Elastix 5. Support packages & Trainings for older Elastix versions will continue to be serviced by Megatelcon / Palosanto. Elastix resellers can sign up as 3CX resellers to enjoy free training, NFR licenses and support here.
@wirestyle22 said in VyOS will not load:
Not a difficult person, but why did @scottalanmiller recommend that? The typical recommendation here would be an ERX due to the low power consumption. EdgeOS is a fork of VyOS too.
@wirestyle22 Because @NerdyDad wanted to use his own hardware.
I am in the asterisk cli via asterisk -rvvvvvvvvvvvvvv, but don't see any apparent registration errors. Any other place I can search for logs in order to troubleshoot the registration process?
So whenever I make a call through my trunk the call rings correctly but the moment someone picks up the phone asterisk hangs up the call.
I am guessing from the logs there is something wrong with the codec selection:
[2016-12-12 17:40:46] WARNING[16075][C-00000023]: channel.c:5540 set_format: Unable to find a codec translation path: (speex) -> (ulaw)
[2016-12-12 17:40:46] WARNING[16075][C-00000023]: channel.c:5540 set_format: Unable to find a codec translation path: (ulaw) -> (speex)
[2016-12-12 17:40:46] WARNING[16075][C-00000023]: dsp.c:1512 ast_dsp_process: Inband DTMF is not supported on codec speex. Use RFC2833
[2016-12-12 17:40:46] WARNING[16075][C-00000023]: channel.c:5540 set_format: Unable to find a codec translation path: (speex) -> (ulaw|alaw|gsm)
[2016-12-12 17:40:46] WARNING[16075][C-00000023]: app_dial.c:1619 wait_for_answer: Unable to write frametype: 2
== Spawn extension (macro-dialout-trunk, s, 23) exited non-zero on 'PJSIP/214-00000038' in macro 'dialout-trunk'
== Spawn extension (from-internal, 36301405, 6) exited non-zero on 'PJSIP/214-00000038'
-- Executing [h@from-internal:1] Macro("PJSIP/214-00000038", "hangupcall") in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:1] GotoIf("PJSIP/214-00000038", "1?theend") in new stack
-- Goto (macro-hangupcall,s,3)
-- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:3] ExecIf("PJSIP/214-00000038", "0?Set(CDR(recordingfile)=)") in new stack
-- Executing [s@macro-hangupcall:4] Hangup("PJSIP/214-00000038", "") in new stack
== Spawn extension (macro-hangupcall, s, 4) exited non-zero on 'PJSIP/214-00000038' in macro 'hangupcall'
== Spawn extension (from-internal, h, 1) exited non-zero on 'PJSIP/214-00000038'
Any idea how to fix this? I have this working properly in elastix 2.4 don't know why its not working with FreePBX.
@scottalanmiller said in Freepbx- Troubleshooting outgoing calls (Call hangups when other side answers):
Why is Speex appearing in your voice path? Set all devices to g711 u-Law.
So that did it, just removed speex from the allowed codecs and calls are terminating properly.
@scottalanmiller said in Would you use public link editing' of documents?:
@Romo said in Would you use public link editing' of documents?:
@scottalanmiller said in Would you use public link editing' of documents?:
@Dashrender said in Would you use public link editing' of documents?:
@JaredBusch said in Would you use public link editing' of documents?:
@jospoortvliet This is a good feature.
I have used this with Google Docs more than once.
It is a very handy feature. I will not likely use it much, but it is awesome to have.
Does Google's option allow for no authentication before the other person is editing it at the same time as you?
Yes. You can send just a link.
You have to log in into Gmail to edit
Ah, true. But not to the same domain.
I correct myself this was modified, if you set the whole file to anyone with the link can edit you don't have to have a Google account, and edits are marked as created by anonymous.
So it is apparently possible in google
@maalmeida puedes acceder a OWA usando la ip del servidor?
So after a full server reboot the salt-minion finally started but it is not properly registering its key to the master correct @WrCombs .
This is really a great crash course in linux commands 
@scottalanmiller I get international shipments all the time sent to other peoples house and my office and they have delivered them without a problem. Why would they even need to know who owns the house to deliver something?
Trusty full sources.list only difference is I get the mx repos
# See http://help.ubuntu.com/community/UpgradeNotes for how to upgrade to
# newer versions of the distribution.
deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted
deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty main restricted
## Major bug fix updates produced after the final release of the
## distribution.
deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted
deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates main restricted
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team. Also, please note that software in universe WILL NOT receive any
## review or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe
deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty universe
deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe
deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates universe
## N.B. software from this repository is ENTIRELY UNSUPPORTED by the Ubuntu
## team, and may not be under a free licence. Please satisfy yourself as to
## your rights to use the software. Also, please note that software in
## multiverse WILL NOT receive any review or updates from the Ubuntu
## security team.
deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse
deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty multiverse
deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse
deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-updates multiverse
## N.B. software from this repository may not have been tested as
## extensively as that contained in the main release, although it includes
## newer versions of some applications which may provide useful features.
## Also, please note that software in backports WILL NOT receive any review
## or updates from the Ubuntu security team.
deb http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main restricted universe multiverse
deb-src http://mx.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ trusty-backports main restricted universe multiverse
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security main restricted
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security universe
deb http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse
deb-src http://security.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty-security multiverse
## Uncomment the following two lines to add software from Canonical's
## 'partner' repository.
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by Canonical and the
## respective vendors as a service to Ubuntu users.
# deb http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner
# deb-src http://archive.canonical.com/ubuntu trusty partner
## This software is not part of Ubuntu, but is offered by third-party
## developers who want to ship their latest software.
deb http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main
deb-src http://extras.ubuntu.com/ubuntu trusty main