@Obsolesce said in Miscellaneous Tech News:

CEO says many of his remote workers didn't open their laptops for a month, and 'only the rarest of full-time caregivers' can be productive employees

These kind of articles bother me. This to me is not a failure on the employee's part, but a total failure on the company's part. If employees and their managers can go a whole month without doing any work, and nobody notices, that's a total failure on the company, their processes, their planning... deliverables, initiatives, projects / tracking, etc.

If one isn't delivering meaningful results, and nobody notices.... so many questions.

The company in question says it's only 800 employees, so it's not like a crazy amount of people or anything, but even if it's 100,000 employees, if you structure correctly, there's no way anyone doing nothing for a month straight should even remotely go unnoticed.

CEO says many of his remote workers didn't open their laptops for a month, and 'only the rarest of full-time caregivers' can be productive employees

These kind of articles bother me. This to me is not a failure on the employee's part, but a total failure on the company's part. If employees and their managers can go a whole month without doing any work, and nobody notices, that's a total failure on the company, their processes, their planning... deliverables, initiatives, projects / tracking, etc.

If one isn't delivering meaningful results, and nobody notices.... so many questions.

@scottalanmiller said in What Are You Doing Right Now:

I generated a poem today...

Good morning, coffee, hot and strong,
Good morning, toothbrush, scrub-a-dub-dub,
Good morning, sunshine, shining bright,
Good morning, world, what a lovely sight.

But now it's time to face the day,
The endless cycle of work and play,
The hustle and bustle of the commute,
The endless meetings that make us mute.

The soul-crushing grind of the daily routine,
The long hours that make us want to scream,
The rat race that never seems to end,
The struggle to keep up, to blend in.

And as the day wears on, we feel the weight,
Of all the deadlines we cannot abate,
Of all the demands we cannot meet,
Of all the goals we cannot defeat.

Until at last, we come to know,
The bitter taste of despair and woe,
The darkness that creeps into our souls,
The hopelessness that takes its toll.

So goodnight, coffee, toothbrush, and sun,
Goodnight, world, for the day is done,
And though we may feel lost and alone,
We will rise again and call it our own.

I just generated one too!

---

In the world of business, data is king,
And storage solutions are a vital thing,
But when it comes to storing large amounts,
Storage Area Networks (SANs) always bounce.

SANs provide storage on a separate network,
From servers and workstations, it's a perk,
This means they are faster and more reliable,
And businesses that use them are truly viable.

Did you know that SANs can store up to 16 exabytes?
That's a whole lot of data, no need for goodbyes,
And with their high speed and low latency,
Accessing that data is a breeze, almost heavenly.

In fact, studies show that businesses with SANs,
Experience less downtime and less wasted spans,
And when it comes to backup and disaster recovery,
SANs have it covered, they're the best, no other.

So, if your business needs storage that's fast and secure,
SANs are the solution you should procure,
With their reliability and high storage capacity,
They're the perfect choice, with no capacity scarcity.

So, when it comes to storing your business data,
Choose SANs, the best solution by a long fata,
They'll keep your data safe and always secure,
And with their speed and reliability, you'll always be sure.

@scottalanmiller said in What are you using to open HEIC files?:

If they are videos, that means HEVC which is just h.265 and everything (except Windows native) reads that

I know for sure that immediately right after a fresh install of Windows 11 22H2 both Pro and Enterprise, h.265 videos do play using the default Media Player.

I do not think that's the case for Windows 10 22H2, though. Your options there are to use another player such as VLC, or upgrade to Windows 11.

@scottalanmiller said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@Obsolesce said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

Oh sweet, ChatGPT built into Edge now!

Literally on the phone talking about all the customers who have gotten infected by using Edge. It's the new attack vector. Most infections I've seen in a long time.

That sounds more like the kind of situation being those people would have gotten infected just the same regardless of web browser used. Latest version of the web browser prior to infection?

Oh sweet, ChatGPT built into Edge now!

@flaxking said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@Obsolesce said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@scottalanmiller said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@Obsolesce said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@scottalanmiller said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

But not plagiarism

Right, it's never plagiarism unless you for example tell chatgpt to output copyrighted content, like tell me the exact content of xyz, such as an existing book.... If it can do that or close to that. Then use that content in the same as if you copy word for word from the book. In that case you are.

Right, exactly.

I asked ChatGPT about it directly, and it said this:

As an AI language model, I am a form of technology that generates text based on the input I receive from users. While I am not a human being, the text I generate is still considered someone else's work.

In the case of using my output as your own, it would be considered plagiarism if you do not properly attribute the text you generated through me. This is because the text I generate is based on a combination of machine learning algorithms and vast amounts of pre-existing text data that has been created by humans. Therefore, failing to properly cite the sources of the text you generate through me would be equivalent to not citing the sources of any other work created by human authors.

In summary, failing to attribute the text generated through an AI language model like myself can be considered plagiarism, even though the output comes from a machine rather than a person.

ME:

You said "can" be considered plagiarism. In what cases is it not considered plagiarism?

ChatGPT:

It's important to note that the issue of whether or not using text generated through an AI language model is considered plagiarism can be a complex one, and there is no clear-cut answer that applies to all situations. In general, however, it is not considered plagiarism to use text generated through an AI language model if:

• You use the text only as a starting point or source of inspiration, and you substantially reword or rewrite the text in your own words.

• You use the text as a secondary source, and you properly cite both the AI language model as the source of the text and any other sources that you drew upon to create your own work.

• The text generated by the AI language model is in the public domain or has been released under a Creative Commons license that allows for reuse and modification.

In any case, it is always important to use your best judgment and consult with a teacher, professor, or other authority on academic integrity if you have any doubts about whether or not your use of text generated through an AI language model could be considered plagiarism.

ME:

Outside of academics is the same true?

ChatGPT :

Yes, the same principles of attribution and integrity apply outside of academics as well. While the consequences of plagiarism may not be as severe as in an academic or commercial context, it is still considered unethical and can damage your reputation and credibility in a given field.

If you are using text generated through an AI language model for non-academic purposes, it is still important to properly attribute the source of the text and obtain permission if necessary. Additionally, if you are using the text to create a product or service that you plan to sell, you should be particularly careful to ensure that you are not infringing on any copyrights or other intellectual property rights.

In summary, whether you are using text generated through an AI language model for academic or non-academic purposes, it is important to adhere to principles of attribution and integrity, and to always consult with appropriate authorities or legal experts if you have any doubts or questions.

Me:

Is it considered plagiarism outside of academics and commercial use?

ChatGPT :

Yes, using someone else's work or ideas without proper attribution or permission is still considered plagiarism even outside of academic or commercial use. Plagiarism is a violation of intellectual property rights and can be a legal issue in some cases.

For example, if you were to copy someone else's creative work, such as a piece of writing, artwork, or music, and present it as your own without permission or attribution, it would be considered plagiarism and could result in legal action being taken against you.

In general, it is important to always give credit to the original source of any work or ideas you use, whether in an academic or non-academic setting. This not only helps you avoid plagiarism but also shows respect for the work of others and can help build a stronger culture of collaboration and creativity.

--

That all said, I did confirm that although plagiarism is not a criminal or civil offense, plagiarism is illegal if it infringes an author's intellectual property rights, including copyright or trademark.

Next ask it why it doesn't give attributions for the preexisting test it uses.

Isn't cahtgpt's output its own words? A concoction of info based on lots of data.

@scottalanmiller said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@Obsolesce said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@scottalanmiller said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

But not plagiarism

Right, it's never plagiarism unless you for example tell chatgpt to output copyrighted content, like tell me the exact content of xyz, such as an existing book.... If it can do that or close to that. Then use that content in the same as if you copy word for word from the book. In that case you are.

Right, exactly.

I asked ChatGPT about it directly, and it said this:

As an AI language model, I am a form of technology that generates text based on the input I receive from users. While I am not a human being, the text I generate is still considered someone else's work.

In the case of using my output as your own, it would be considered plagiarism if you do not properly attribute the text you generated through me. This is because the text I generate is based on a combination of machine learning algorithms and vast amounts of pre-existing text data that has been created by humans. Therefore, failing to properly cite the sources of the text you generate through me would be equivalent to not citing the sources of any other work created by human authors.

In summary, failing to attribute the text generated through an AI language model like myself can be considered plagiarism, even though the output comes from a machine rather than a person.

ME:

You said "can" be considered plagiarism. In what cases is it not considered plagiarism?

ChatGPT:

It's important to note that the issue of whether or not using text generated through an AI language model is considered plagiarism can be a complex one, and there is no clear-cut answer that applies to all situations. In general, however, it is not considered plagiarism to use text generated through an AI language model if:

• You use the text only as a starting point or source of inspiration, and you substantially reword or rewrite the text in your own words.

• You use the text as a secondary source, and you properly cite both the AI language model as the source of the text and any other sources that you drew upon to create your own work.

• The text generated by the AI language model is in the public domain or has been released under a Creative Commons license that allows for reuse and modification.

In any case, it is always important to use your best judgment and consult with a teacher, professor, or other authority on academic integrity if you have any doubts about whether or not your use of text generated through an AI language model could be considered plagiarism.

ME:

Outside of academics is the same true?

ChatGPT :

Yes, the same principles of attribution and integrity apply outside of academics as well. While the consequences of plagiarism may not be as severe as in an academic or commercial context, it is still considered unethical and can damage your reputation and credibility in a given field.

If you are using text generated through an AI language model for non-academic purposes, it is still important to properly attribute the source of the text and obtain permission if necessary. Additionally, if you are using the text to create a product or service that you plan to sell, you should be particularly careful to ensure that you are not infringing on any copyrights or other intellectual property rights.

In summary, whether you are using text generated through an AI language model for academic or non-academic purposes, it is important to adhere to principles of attribution and integrity, and to always consult with appropriate authorities or legal experts if you have any doubts or questions.

Me:

Is it considered plagiarism outside of academics and commercial use?

ChatGPT :

Yes, using someone else's work or ideas without proper attribution or permission is still considered plagiarism even outside of academic or commercial use. Plagiarism is a violation of intellectual property rights and can be a legal issue in some cases.

For example, if you were to copy someone else's creative work, such as a piece of writing, artwork, or music, and present it as your own without permission or attribution, it would be considered plagiarism and could result in legal action being taken against you.

In general, it is important to always give credit to the original source of any work or ideas you use, whether in an academic or non-academic setting. This not only helps you avoid plagiarism but also shows respect for the work of others and can help build a stronger culture of collaboration and creativity.

--

That all said, I did confirm that although plagiarism is not a criminal or civil offense, plagiarism is illegal if it infringes an author's intellectual property rights, including copyright or trademark.

@scottalanmiller said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

But not plagiarism

Right, it's never plagiarism unless you for example tell chatgpt to output copyrighted content, like tell me the exact content of xyz, such as an existing book.... If it can do that or close to that. Then use that content in the same as if you copy word for word from the book. In that case you are.

@PhlipElder said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

@scottalanmiller said in Staying in Ethics and Legal with ChatGPT usage?:

Every generation spends time learning new tools. Every old generation feels like this is lazy. But just as we use printers instead of type writers. And our grandparents used typewriters instead of pen and paper. And their great great great grandparents used pens instead of chisels and rocks... it's not that we are increasingly lazy. It is that we are able to reduce the amount of wasted effort so that we can spend more time on the parts that are important.

Today we can write more intelligent discourse and communicate about it in minutes than stone age man could record in a month and share with no one. The use of tools to eliminate or reduce the unnecessary allows time to focus on real learning, growth, and productivity.

The closest thing that I can think of as far as my attitude towards ChatGPT is plagiarism.

I do not see it as a tool when someone takes a few moments of work from ChatGPT and presents it as their own.

That is not honourable at all.

It 100% depends on how you use it. It's not plagiarism by its own, not at all.

If your boss says he wants an outline of a given tech, and you can get it accurately in a few minutes versus a coworker who spends a day on it, it's totally not plagiarism and are way more valuable as an employee.

If you use chatgpt to write a book and is 100% copy from chatgpt output, that is not plagiarism either.

If your English professor wants you to write an essay, and you didn't write it, then I see a problem.

@openit At most, I can see using it as a starting point, then going through it personally to refine/fix/improve the output before using it. Anyone using the output word for word without combing through it and making it their own would be an idiot.

That's why tools like these exist:

https://aiwritingcheck.org/
https://openai-openai-detector.hf.space/

@CCWTech said in Windows defender quarentined my VM... WTH?:

Server down this morning...
VHDX File is just gone... It's missing...
I found out that Windows Defender had detected it was (or had) a virus and quarantined it...

How Windows defender even would ever quarantine a VHDX is beyond me.

Come on Microsoft!

That's odd. VHD/VHDX files are NOT ever scanned by the host, unless of course they are mounted in the same way as a disk or USB disk is to the host OS for example. Otherwise, they are treated like a black box. So something else had to have happened for it to be quarantined by the host OS. That doesn't just happen willy-nilly.

Additionally, VM files are automatically excluded when the Hyper-V server role is installed. So again, something isn't configured correctly or something weird is going on.

What happened to you isn't default behavior.

@Pete-S said in Allow Binaries on Linux to Run on Well Known Privileged Ports:

If you search for net_bind you would assume it would find both these post but it finds nothing.

It seems to only search "words", and that isn't a word or part of a word.

https://support.google.com/webmasters/answer/40052?hl=en

@scottalanmiller said in I can't even:

Talking to a customer who tells us that they have a two year old server "so it is time to replace it." Um, what? Who replaces two year old hardware.

Hardware...

Intel 4th Gen Desktop CPU
8GB RAM
Spinning Rust
Windows 10

OMG, it's a decade old desktop that wasn't specc'd out to be anything like a server at all even ten years ago!

They are calling that a server? I can assume they are misusing the MS license then too.

Does anyone know of a real good widely available mango flavored hot sauce? Nothing super hot, but some spice to it.

@CCWTech said in Is it legal? Windows 10 or 11 as a server:

Use case:
Small veterinary office with less than 10 computers, about 7 employees.

Software is AVImark. A veterinary records managment program. It requires a shared network path and also to run Guardian (a service that runs on the server in order to make the program work.).

Is Windows 10 / 11 legal to use as a server in this case? (The software vendor AVImark) says it is.

No, you cannot. AVImark is incorrect.

https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/UseTerms/Retail/Windows/11/UseTerms_Retail_Windows_11_English.htm

@scottalanmiller said in Windows 2022 Disk Defrag Freezing System:

Nearly new, very vanilla, Windows Server 2022 system with a recurring freezing issue. The system would drop network connections and even the console was unresponsive. Been troubleshooting for the last few weeks.

Finally had a chance to be on the console at the time that the freeze happened and it was super sluggish, but not entirely frozen. We managed to get Task Manager open and were able to see that the Disk Defragmenter taking all available RAM and slamming the disks.

My default in Windows Server 2022, disk defrag is set to run every week. This likely makes little sense if you have SSD, NVMe, or are virtualized. We disabled that and stopped the current run and things returned to normal. All is well now from what we can tell.

You should never Defrag SSDs except for very specific reasons.

Id run a SSD health check on the SSDs themself to see if there are any issues.