Does anyone know of a hosting provider that hosts/manages VitalPBX for very small groups?
A friend of mine is volunteering at a non profit and asked me about VoIP phone service. They only need three phones.
I am familiar with VitalPBX, this is why I am asking about VitalPBX specifically.
@dashrender said in Routing from LAN/Sonicwall to Comcast DHCP Client:
But since it's not, try adding a virtual adapter on the WAN interface of the SonicWall and assigning it IP 10.x.x.x in the same range as the web server. Now the web server won't know how to get back, so you'll need a route entry on the webserver as well.
This was the closest to the way we went.
I used an available physical port on the Sonicwall, assigned it a static IP (10.1.10.253) on the Comcast Cable Modem internal LAN subnet.
I then added a static route on the Sonicwall to find the Comcast LAN and I added a route on the Cable modem to find the Sonicwall LAN.
It works just as we want.
Thanks for all the comments, it helped lead us to a solution to handle this non standard configuration.
@dashrender said in Routing from LAN/Sonicwall to Comcast DHCP Client:
then I'm confused - why it is attached in the manner it is? Who's supposed to access the webserver?
People on the sonicwall LAN.
@scottalanmiller said in Looking to learn/research MeshCentral:
Ability to have a large deployment with security built in already and not lose that.
Do you know if it is FIPS 140-2 certified?
I'm going to contact the web server people and ask if we can move it to our LAN subnet.
@dashrender said in Routing from LAN/Sonicwall to Comcast DHCP Client:
As @notverypunny asked - can you reach the webserver from something outside of your network?
No. That's verboten.
@notverypunny said in Routing from LAN/Sonicwall to Comcast DHCP Client:
Have you got the appropriate rules in place to allow WAN > LAN as well as the NAT rules on the Comcast CPE? Can you get to the webserver from another connection? Keep in mind that since you're using the public IP it's got to be configured and managed as an independent, internet-facing service. Are all 3 devices (the 2 SW and the Comcast CPE) on the same connection and the IPs part of the same subnet or are we dealing with multiple discrete ISP lines? There's lots of room for incorrect assumptions to be made with the info you've provided. If possible, I'd put everything on one device, preferably the strongest of the 2 SW units and manage everything that way.
I have rules in the Sonicwall to allow from 10.1.10.x to 192.168.1.x, even though they are not required. (The traffic is initiated by the device on the 192.168.1.x LAN network)
No NAT rules on the Comcast CPE. It shouldn't be needed because I am not trying to use the CPE public IP address as a destination, only as a gateway.
Yes, all three are the same. The two SWs are plugged into the CPE.
CPE = xx.xx.xx.98
SW1 = xx.xx.xx.97
SW2 = xx.xx.xx.96
Only one ISP in the mix.
@jaredbusch said in Routing from LAN/Sonicwall to Comcast DHCP Client:
@jasgot said in Routing from LAN/Sonicwall to Comcast DHCP Client:
All I can guess is the cable modem is not turning the traffic around and putting it back on it's 10.1.10.x lan subnet.
This would not be a modem if it could. It would be a router.
So I added a static route to the Comcast Cable Modem. So now it is a router.
Still no joy.
I am having a hard time figuring out where the block is. I am trying to connect to a web server that is on the Comcast Cable Modem LAN from a computer that is on behind a Sonicwall Router/Firewall with a Static IP from Comcast.
Here is a diagram:
192.168.1.x TO 10.1.10.44 does not work. The sonicwall claims the 10.1.10.x subnet is on the WAN port and reachable through 96.x.x.x (Cablem Modem's Public IP).
All I can guess is the cable modem is not turning the traffic around and putting it back on it's 10.1.10.x lan subnet.
Could there be a setting to deal with this?
@stuartjordan said in Looking to learn/research MeshCentral:
Tatical RMM integrates with meshcentral as well apparently. Although I've only tried the demo but looks promising. https://github.com/wh1te909/tacticalrmm
This is why I wish to take another look at Mesh
Have there really been no posts since 2020? I'm not finding much when I search for it here.
@jaredbusch said in What Are You Doing Right Now:
Happy Monday.
Southbound for Pocahontas, AR.
How many miles per year do you drive?
Gave up. Saving to Server 2019 instead.
@gjacobse said in Networking / Plotter / Save as PDF problem:
Is this a share also? Scanning to a network share or a PC share would be no different..
Yes. I tried to mimic everything possible.
@gjacobse said in Networking / Plotter / Save as PDF problem:
Are you scanning 8.5x11" paper or a different size?
Mostly size "D", but....Size Doesn't Matter!
I have this HP T830 plotter that can scan too. When I am scanning to a share on a Server 2012 Server, it will only save two pages (one scan session), and gives a useless error before the third page finishes.
If, however, I scan to local USB on the printer, or scan to a Windows 10 PC connected to the plotter with a switch and NO other equipment (just the plotter, switch, and PC) I can scan to either for as many pages as I choose. (Stopped at 19).
Not sure where to start to trouble shoot this. Any ides?
@carnival-boy said in Apple plans to scan your images for child porn:
But the software doesn't have the ability.
Can you finish this sentence? Not sure what you are saying.
@dustinb3403 said in Random Thread - Anything Goes:
That's a clever way to not ruin the site lines
Much better than this one!
@carnival-boy said in Apple plans to scan your images for child porn:
No I wasn't. I said that the scanning was done on the phone, but that Apple can't access this data. The data is private until it us uploaded to the cloud.
So how do they know if the content of a photo is suspect? Unless mean a "human" can't access the data?