Best posts made by JaredBusch

Ubiquiti does not release a docker image for UniFi. So you simply have to take your own risks with community stuff..

https://www.ui.com/download/unifi/

I thought we had a thread about this in the past as well. But absolutely a good reminder.

@Pete-S said in What Does the V- Stand for in Microsoft Email Addresses:

@scottalanmiller

Could you please update the post with one or two examples of how a "scam" address would look?

Also here
https://mangolassi.it/post/525507

https://i.imgur.com/DggGFuG.png

@Pete-S said in What Does the V- Stand for in Microsoft Email Addresses:

@scottalanmiller

Could you please update the post with one or two examples of how a "scam" address would look?

one was posted here 2 years ago.
https://mangolassi.it/post/510522

No idea how I got in this thread… content moved

@Dashrender said in Grandstream GWN7660/GWN7664:

Why wouldn't you do GS APs?

Because they are small market/less used generally, I would not just use them for the hell of it. But if other stock was unavailable, i would look at them.

I have nothing against TP-LINK, better than Netgear IMO.

Have not used these models though.

My old post on the topic.
https://www.mangolassi.it/topic/13020/estimating-sip-trunk-costs

@scottalanmiller said in TP-link business switches?:

@JaredBusch said in TP-link business switches?:

@Dashrender said in TP-link business switches?:

@Pete-S huh - I'm sure prices are some higher now.. but $200 for a 24 port switch seems high, not low - but JB will just tell me to shutup and go away now...

The Ubiquiti EdgeSwitch 24 LITE (non-PoE) is $240 MSRP.

I'd definitely prefer this. And it has a remote controller that is hosted for free (see other thread, jaja.)

No, the would be the UniFi Switch line. EdgeSwitch has none of that. Well, maybe it does now that it is called UISP? They could have that hosted for people also. I never looked.

@Pete-S That is what the docs say. I have never tried.

But also, why not have everything in the cluster? What is the need to make them "individual" hosts?

@Pete-S said in 2 disks or 1 disk with 2 partitions for new VM?:

@Fredtx said in 2 disks or 1 disk with 2 partitions for new VM?:

I'm building a new VM on a VmWare host to replace a 2008 server. The 08 VM has 2 virtual disks each mounted with a drive letter (C and D). Would it be better when creating the new VM to instead create 1 virtual disk, and divide it into 2 partitions (C and D)? Thoughts?

VM with 2 virtual disks for sure. Much easier if you need to expand one. Also better if you have different storage options on your host, as you can place the virtual disks where they are best suited.

100% agree, definitely 2 virtual if you need more than one disk. Whether or not you have 2 disks is a different discussion.

@Dashrender said in Damaged/Lost Iphone in default setup - HIPAA secure?:

so if your pin is say 1111, aka super easy to guess - would you still consider yourself protected under the requirements?

Yes, because the requirement is encryption. It is encrypted.

Yeah, I don’t get this. If it is digital, I likely have your email. I don’t need anything else.

@Pete-S said in Live migration Proxmox?:

@JaredBusch said in Live migration Proxmox?:

@Pete-S That is what the docs say. I have never tried.

But also, why not have everything in the cluster? What is the need to make them "individual" hosts?

Pools (resource pools) as they are called in xenserver/xcp-ng will put at lot of restrictions on the hosts.

Pools are managed as one entity (through the pool master) and works best when you have shared storage.

They are however a huge hassle when you don't have shared storage. So hosts that use local storage and are individual are best kept as separate hosts. So in this case everything started out as pools but have been migrated to individual hosts.

Maybe it works differently in Proxmox, I've only used it in the lab on a single host.

I manage multiple servers through the single IP of the cluster, but you can still directly access the individual nodes if you desire.

I do not know about resource pools and such as I have not used those with Proxmox yet. Just multiple servers in a cluster, but no shared resources more than a setup for replication at one place. But that one is only for replication, so not a good example.

@scottalanmiller said in 2 disks or 1 disk with 2 partitions for new VM?:

@JaredBusch said in 2 disks or 1 disk with 2 partitions for new VM?:

@Dashrender said in 2 disks or 1 disk with 2 partitions for new VM?:

because smart phones have been out since the early 2000's

iPhone was released in 2007

I got my smart phone in 2006 and most people I worked with had had them for years at that point.

People had blackberry and palmOS devices, I did also.

But the smartphone was not mass market until after the original iPhone.

@Pete-S said in Pure KVM server "hardening"?:

only ssh for management.

If no one has access it is secure. WTF else are you wanting? If you have nothing listening, what is there to "secure"

@Fredtx said in Does block level sync exist?:

My main concern is that the copies are good in all locations

No your main concern is that your primary backup is good.

After that, it is just a copy operation. If you are worried about a copy operation, your solution is doing something wrong.

@Pete-S said in Mikrotik software firewall/router?:

Does anyone have experience with Mikrotik's software firewall/routers?

only briefly at one recent customer.

@Pete-S said in Mikrotik software firewall/router?:

Or any opinion on their products in general, especially for business use?

Their modern gear seems to work well.

@Pete-S said in Mikrotik software firewall/router?:

I used to think they were some kind of garage company

Well they seemed aimed at the hobby market for a long time.

@dmacf10 said in Mikrotik software firewall/router?:

working at a small ISP

Were they a WISP?

@Pete-S I forgot, that Mikrotik was a big name in the MSP market before that market went to NGFW stuff with subscription markups and returns.

@Skyetel said in Skyetel Acquired ...:

When we combine the traffic volumes of their holdings into Skyetel's network,

This part excites me. Of everything the HFA has invested into, the SKyetel platform is the one that is so good they are moving everything to it.

@Skyetel said in Skyetel Acquired ...:

we become big enough to where the letters IPO have been thrown around

I know it helps with cash flow, but not a fan. I generally do not think short term appeasing of huge swathes of public investors is a good thing.