@scottalanmiller said in GeekBench Results for Cloud Servers:
@emad-r can't need to as you can remove them. It doesn't even need to control root itself.
It is locked account actually, seems like it is only needed the first time
@scottalanmiller said in GeekBench Results for Cloud Servers:
@emad-r can't need to as you can remove them. It doesn't even need to control root itself.
It is locked account actually, seems like it is only needed the first time
does vultr also needs to create root account with your instances ? i dont think i ever saw this.
Like Vultr secondary root cloud account ? with your installed system ? Btw the image below is from OVH

@pete-s said in Best way to install PHP, SQL Server Express, IIS on Windows Server 2016?:
I want this up and running with a minimum of change to the PHP code.
I have feeling this wont go as smoothly as you wish.
But our thoughts and prayers heading your way ...
@storageninja said in GeekBench Results for Cloud Servers:
@emad-r said in GeekBench Results for Cloud Servers:
Thought about Network testing and came up with this:
That's just a testing of peering.
Help us out then, I think we at ML need to come up with standard for testing Cloud.
And how is it peering ? cause peering means:
the exchange of data directly between Internet service providers, rather than via the Internet.
I am using the same separate server of iperf on both nodes and both nodes are located in the same geolocation.
@emad-r said in GeekBench Results for Cloud Servers:
Topic like this should be pinned and done every year or so. No one keeps alot of track about this.
What else we can test efficiently...
RAM Speed ? but who cares about this.
How we can test VM Cloud Download/Upload
Thought about Network testing and came up with this:
iperf3 -c bouygues.iperf.fr -t 30 = upload
iperf3 -Rc bouygues.iperf.fr -t 30 = download

This is my Vultr 5$ 1 vCPU, 1GB RAM.
Yours has an extra 200 Mhz due to bigger package.
I think Vultr is the best for CPU and IO speed from what I feel

Topic like this should be pinned and done every year or so. No one keeps alot of track about this.
What else we can test efficiently...
RAM Speed ? but who cares about this.
How we can test VM Cloud Download/Upload
@nashbrydges said in Is Anyone Successfully Using Nextcloud Passman App For Sharing Passwords?:
Looking at the app, it hasn't been updated in some time. Will see if the Passwords app is any better.
I think passwords app is more active and we are still researching both apps.
@pete-s
Use Virt Manager and create new storage pool this is the easy way, you make it directory type. there are many other types like LVM.
@scottalanmiller said in Dark Fiber:
Not really dark fiber if you are using it. It's lit fiber. Dark fiber is the fiber that has no connections on it, waiting to be plugged in.
In france they call it Black Fibre, or dark as way to mean this Fiber is totally dedicated for your network like leased Fiber with no shared companies but you.
https://www.logicaldoc.com/
the open source version for document management systems.
Java based, but easy install and stable. my HR are currently studying it.
@gjacobse said in Huawei and ZTE handed 5G network ban in Australia:
Wider coverage and more stable connections than current 4G technology are also highlighted as benefits.
But they allowed them 4G ? seems 100% political decision.
Someone needs to check is the Australian government got check from Trump.
Who is a better EMR vendor than EPIC? They are kinda the gold standard and the #2 (Cerner) isn't going to support it either.
Even if we get into the smaller players (Care4, AllScripts) that are not supported either. That's also ignoring that the DB vendors in these cases (Cache, Oracle, etc) are going to not support it.
Try telling a chief medical officer, or head a practice "Hey... so we are going to go with this no-name vendor for the application you spend 90% of your time in, because they would support Hyper-V on KVM on ESXi!"
What vendor and what nesting have you seen supported?
ThoughtWorks uses Centos 6.7 for there Bahmin EMR and it is the recommended without updates, also as vendor they dont want the complexity of Virtualization so they love to deploy real iron
https://bahmni.atlassian.net/wiki/spaces/BAH/pages/33128505/Install+Bahmni+on+CentOS

Future plans to fix this is docker, and containers which I get but performance will suffer, currently they use centos + ansible + scheduled remote sessions which works great we just need the base updated (for the last 2 years this is still feature request), Centos latest is already behind.
And dont get me started on the cost, cost has nothing to do it, it is always decisions made without IT people and after the decision is made, IT people raise concerns and they get cock blocked and treated like they are harming the project.
Point = TW are way over rated, dont ever consider them.
@wirestyle22 said in Nested hypervisors?:
Maybe I'm missing something but why in the world would I ever want to use nested hypervisors? Vendor requirements?
learn and test
https://mangolassi.it/topic/17807/proud-smug-post-kvm-and-gluster-and-accomplishment/1
@black3dynamite said in Nested hypervisors?:
Workstation Player
Yup go figure for value, Virtualbox has no intention of doing this amazing feature since 2011
https://www.virtualbox.org/ticket/4032

@momurda said in Proud/Smug Post = KVM and Gluster and accomplishment:
It took about 20 seconds for the quality to increase to HD. it was illegibly fuzzy before that
Youtube doing their tricky deeds, I think if your not high rank uploader or many views they dont give you priority , but hey their service are free so we cant complain.
@rojoloco said in Proud/Smug Post = KVM and Gluster and accomplishment:
@emad-r said in Proud/Smug Post = KVM and Gluster and accomplishment:
@dbeato said in Proud/Smug Post = KVM and Gluster and accomplishment:
I gotta tell you that the quality the video leaves a lot to be desired as I can see you are using VMware Workstation to do the Lab testing.
huh? the video is in full HD resolution https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhlowDhZeRsDefine "Quality" ?
Able to read anything on the screen. Just because you rendered it at 1080p doesn't mean the video source was of any quality. Can't read a damn thing on that screen. Garbage in = garbage out. If it was a screen capture, it was obviously set to low quality. If you used a camera, get a better monitor.
it is perfect here, make sure to select Quality 1080p and full screen and watch on youtube.
c