Converting to a virtual environment
-
@Danp said in Converting to a virtual environment:
This is one area where I feel that XO is missing an option to backup the host / metadata to a separate location. If you need to rebuild the XO host (on SD) without restoring all the VMs (local storage), how does one accomplish this if you haven't backed up the above info?
But if the metadata isn't on the host, and XS says that you should not back that up, why would you want XO to have an option for that? Just rebuild from the installer (think of this as being pre-backed up) and the metadata is already available.
-
@scottalanmiller said
That's what I thought. So if the metadata is being backed up with the VMs in place, what would you be restoring for the host?
The host is backed up to your local machine through XC.
-
@BRRABill said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@scottalanmiller said
That's what I thought. So if the metadata is being backed up with the VMs in place, what would you be restoring for the host?
The host is backed up to your local machine through XC.
Is there a benefit to that?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@BRRABill said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@scottalanmiller said
That's what I thought. So if the metadata is being backed up with the VMs in place, what would you be restoring for the host?
The host is backed up to your local machine through XC.
Is there a benefit to that?
That's a good question.
It is basically host configuration, I guess.
If you had a lot of settings changed (such as if there were a lot of pool members, etc.) maybe it is valuable.
This is a good article I have been working off of:
http://techblog.danielpellarini.com/sysadmin/steps-to-take-to-restore-xenserver-from-backup/But I am assuming since Citrix says to take regular backups of the host, perhaps it is needed. But perhaps not.
This is one of those times it would be great to have someone from there on here to say ... yeah, definitely or no you're crazy!
-
@Danp said in Converting to a virtual environment:
This is one area where I feel that XO is missing an option to backup the host / metadata to a separate location. If you need to rebuild the XO host (on SD) without restoring all the VMs (local storage), how does one accomplish this if you haven't backed up the above info?
It can be done. There is apparently a "try my best" type option.
But it would be best to have this info, without question.
Why it's not INCLUDED somewhere, don't ask me. Like a small config file in the SR that does mapping.
But since you can automate the backing up of the metadata, perhaps they feel like the functionality is already there.
-
@BRRABill said in Converting to a virtual environment:
But I am assuming since Citrix says to take regular backups of the host, perhaps it is needed. But perhaps not.
I thought that they said not to take them.
-
@scottalanmiller See our prior discussion here.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@BRRABill said in Converting to a virtual environment:
But I am assuming since Citrix says to take regular backups of the host, perhaps it is needed. But perhaps not.
I thought that they said not to take them.
No they said to reinstall, but then proceed to say to take very regular backups of the host.
Here's the whole thing. (NOTE: this can be done with using the CLI as well._
*Citrix recommends that, whenever possible, you leave the installed state of XenServer hosts unaltered. That is,
do not install any additional packages or start additional services on XenServer hosts, and treat them as if they
are appliances. The best way to restore, then, is to reinstall XenServer host software from the installation media.
If you have multiple XenServer hosts, the best approach is to configure a TFTP server and appropriate answerfiles
for this purpose (see the XenServer Installation Guide).
For VMs, the best approach is to install backup agents on them, just as if they were standard physical servers.
For Windows VMs, as of this release we have tested CA BrightStor ARCserve Backup, and Symantec NetBackup
and Backup Exec.
For more information about backup tools tested, best practices, and backups in general, see the Citrix Knowledge
Base.
107
Citrix recommends that you frequently perform as many of the following backup procedures as possible to
recover from possible server and/or software failure.To backup pool metadata
- Run the command:
xe pool-dump-database file-name=<backup> - Run the command:
xe pool-restore-database file-name=<backup> dry-run=true
This command checks that the target machine has an appropriate number of appropriately named NICs,
which is required for the backup to succeed.
To backup host configuration and software
• Run the command:
xe host-backup host=<host> file-name=<hostbackup>
Note:
• Do not create the backup in the control domain.
• This procedure may create a large backup file.
• To complete a restore you have to reboot to the original install CD.
• This data can only be restored to the original machine.* - Run the command:
-
This post is deleted! -
wow .... errr... have I opened-up a can of worms here ?
-
@PRPL said in Converting to a virtual environment:
wow .... errr... have I opened-up a can of worms here ?
Yeah maybe this is a time for a fork!
-
@PRPL said in Converting to a virtual environment:
wow .... errr... have I opened-up a can of worms here ?
And also backed up the statement of @JaredBusch
-
Further on there is this. Perhaps this answers your question, @scottalanmiller
"Because the privileged control domain is best left as installed, without customizing it with
other packages, Citrix recommends that you set up a network boot environment to cleanly
perform a fresh installation from the XenServer media as a recovery strategy. In many cases
you will not need to backup the control domain at all, but just save the pool metadata (see
Section 8.9.1, “Backing up Virtual Machine metadata”). This backup method should always
be considered complementary to backing up the pool metadata."I take this as, if you leave it "as installed" there is no need to backup the host.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@PRPL said in Converting to a virtual environment:
I did look @ the free Starwind Virtual SAN, but from what I read, I understand that the free version will allow only storage and not compute, on the same host... That's allowed, only in the paid version... ??
I've never heard of that limitation. that would be a new and surprising one. I'm quite confident that you can put your storage on your compute nodes.
Checking with @KOOLER @StarWind_Software
I'm making this statement, based on my understanding of the Free vs Paid document, found on https://www.starwindsoftware.com/whitepapers/free-vs-paid.pdf
Please look @ the comparison on the second-last page of this PDF... It says, next to Deployment Scenarios , that Hyperconvergence, is available only for Certain User Statuses (Check Status)
-
@BRRABill said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@PRPL said in Converting to a virtual environment:
wow .... errr... have I opened-up a can of worms here ?
And also backed up the statement of @JaredBusch
Or mine... are you carrying Windows complexities into the simple XenServer world?
-
@PRPL said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@scottalanmiller said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@PRPL said in Converting to a virtual environment:
I did look @ the free Starwind Virtual SAN, but from what I read, I understand that the free version will allow only storage and not compute, on the same host... That's allowed, only in the paid version... ??
I've never heard of that limitation. that would be a new and surprising one. I'm quite confident that you can put your storage on your compute nodes.
Checking with @KOOLER @StarWind_Software
I'm making this statement, based on my understanding of the Free vs Paid document, found on https://www.starwindsoftware.com/whitepapers/free-vs-paid.pdf
Please look @ the comparison on the second-last page of this PDF... It says, next to Deployment Scenarios , that Hyperconvergence, is available only for Certain User Statuses (Check Status)
that does appear to say that, but goes against hundreds of posts from the company so I think that this might be outdated.
-
@BRRABill said in Converting to a virtual environment:
Further on there is this. Perhaps this answers your question, @scottalanmiller
"Because the privileged control domain is best left as installed, without customizing it with
other packages, Citrix recommends that you set up a network boot environment to cleanly
perform a fresh installation from the XenServer media as a recovery strategy. In many cases
you will not need to backup the control domain at all, but just save the pool metadata (see
Section 8.9.1, “Backing up Virtual Machine metadata”). This backup method should always
be considered complementary to backing up the pool metadata."I take this as, if you leave it "as installed" there is no need to backup the host.
AND that you should leave it "as installed".
-
@scottalanmiller said
Or mine... are you carrying Windows complexities into the simple XenServer world?
His statement being...
"some of the biggesest threads on XS on this forum to see how unstable it is for people that do not fully know what they are doing" -
@BRRABill said in Converting to a virtual environment:
@scottalanmiller said
Or mine... are you carrying Windows complexities into the simple XenServer world?
His statement being...
"some of the biggesest threads on XS on this forum to see how unstable it is for people that do not fully know what they are doing"And my sentiment being that it was only people doing non-standard things and those following the instructions and keeping it simple (with the exception of needing to skip the SD piece) it's rock solid. Is anyone having issues with normal usage? I'm not aware of a stability concern. And also I pointed out that the things that cause the "instabilities" as they are seen will do the same things on Hyper-V... so the issue isn't about XenServer, it's about people pushing boundaries on test boxes to see what breaks and where.
-
@scottalanmiller said
And my sentiment being that it was only people doing non-standard things and those following the instructions and keeping it simple (with the exception of needing to skip the SD piece) it's rock solid. Is anyone having issues with normal usage? I'm not aware of a stability concern. And also I pointed out that the things that cause the "instabilities" as they are seen will do the same things on Hyper-V... so the issue isn't about XenServer, it's about people pushing boundaries on test boxes to see what breaks and where.
I ain't touchin' nothing' no mores.
(Though I am going to keep testing my /var/log theories.)
