ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan

    IT Discussion
    11
    76
    19.6k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • Deleted74295D
      Deleted74295 Banned
      last edited by

      Hi.

      I looked at CrashPlan and BackBlaze years ago.

      CrashPlan, I dropped because of the requirement for Java on the end clients. It might be the most amazing tool in the world but Java sucks, so when choosing which to go for, I went with BackBlaze.

      I've got people using the home & business backup of Backblaze, no problems or complaints so far. For 1-2 years now.

      By default, the Backblaze client throttles it's own speed, but in the client you can turn off the throttle and let it use as much as you want if you prefer. So if speed of upload is a concern, have a look in the client settings.

      @dafyre said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

      Does the Backblaze backup client have the option to back up to a local drive or a USB drive as well as to your servers?

      Nope, the BackBlaze client is there purely to upload & download from BackBlaze servers. Which I prefer because it means their focus is on making that feature work rather than other bits.

      A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • Deleted74295D
        Deleted74295 Banned @bbigford
        last edited by

        @BBigford said

        Prefer to leave your apps open, lock your computer, and go home for the weekend? No backup is taking place.

        Don't machines get rebooted for patching & updates out of office hours?

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          I wonder if @aaron and @ChristopherBB have relayed on the Java issue to BB? I'm sure product teams would love to hear that them avoiding Java and using a native tool set alone is a cause for customer acquisition. That's a metric or anecdote that they would love to have in their collection, I'm sure.

          Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • Deleted74295D
            Deleted74295 Banned @scottalanmiller
            last edited by Deleted74295

            @scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

            I wonder if @aaron and @ChristopherBB have relayed on the Java issue to BB? I'm sure product teams would love to hear that them avoiding Java and using a native tool set alone is a cause for customer acquisition. That's a metric or anecdote that they would love to have in their collection, I'm sure.

            No no. They use it on their marketing already 🙂

            https://www.backblaze.com/cloud-backup.html
            Native Software
            Java is responsible for 91%* of security attacks. Backblaze's code is native to Mac and PC and doesn't use Java.

            Do I want to support a company who does not use Java? Absolutely. Until CrashPlan changes their app, they won't get clients from my end.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • A
              Alex Sage @Deleted74295
              last edited by

              @Breffni-Potter BackBlaze seems to be better but I am sticking to CrashPlan due to the family plan. 10 computer for 13.99 is hard to beat.

              Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • Deleted74295D
                Deleted74295 Banned @Alex Sage
                last edited by Deleted74295

                @aaronstuder said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                @Breffni-Potter BackBlaze seems to be better but I am sticking to CrashPlan due to the family plan. 10 computer for 13.99 is hard to beat.

                But I'd question why they are much cheaper than BackBlaze.

                Either BackBlaze just want more money or CrashPlan are cutting corners somewhere.

                For me, cloud backup is insurance against either my stupidity, theft/fire/flood. I prefer spending a bit more and not having to worry about it but to each their own.

                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller @Deleted74295
                  last edited by

                  @Breffni-Potter said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                  @aaronstuder said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                  @Breffni-Potter BackBlaze seems to be better but I am sticking to CrashPlan due to the family plan. 10 computer for 13.99 is hard to beat.

                  But I'd question why they are much cheaper than BackBlaze.

                  Either BackBlaze just want more money or CrashPlan are cutting corners somewhere.

                  For me, cloud backup is insurance against either my stupidity, theft/fire/flood. I prefer spending a bit more and not having to worry about it but to each their own.

                  Or CP has some brilliant means of making the backups cost less. I doubt that they do, just saying it's a possibility.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    It's possible that the family plan has shown that statistically people back up only so much "per family." These plans of all types are all about stats. Any individual might end up costing the vendor money, but on average they make money.

                    A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • JaredBuschJ
                      JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      Why does everyone keep complaining about CrashPlan and Java? Java is not installed on any Windows based system directly. If it uses it under the hood, I would not care. There is nothing to maintain or update.

                      0_1461688756877_upload-1ff0f7d8-9665-4801-a462-bdaa00e794e6

                      Deleted74295D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch
                        last edited by

                        On the same note, it does require java on Linux boxes, but it works perfectly with Java from the repos. So it stays part of the base update process anyway.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                        • A
                          Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                          It's possible that the family plan has shown that statistically people back up only so much "per family." These plans of all types are all about stats. Any individual might end up costing the vendor money, but on average they make money.

                          Right, I am only backing up 5 computer, about 500GB-ish.

                          That would cost me $25 on BB.

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                            last edited by

                            @aaronstuder said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                            @scottalanmiller said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                            It's possible that the family plan has shown that statistically people back up only so much "per family." These plans of all types are all about stats. Any individual might end up costing the vendor money, but on average they make money.

                            Right, I am only backing up 5 computer, about 500GB-ish.

                            That would cost me $25 on BB.

                            I'm sure that CP has really good statistics on how a family plan alters the average "per machine" backup amounts.

                            A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • A
                              Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              @scottalanmiller Right, if everyone was using many TB's of data it would never be profitable.

                              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @Alex Sage
                                last edited by

                                @aaronstuder said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                                @scottalanmiller Right, if everyone was using many TB's of data it would never be profitable.

                                Yeah. they know that almost never do more than one or two family members keep a lot of data. Like in my family, if we needed to save all of our family videos we are going to save them all from one computer. Letting each of us back up our own machines won't significantly increase the amount that we back up total, it just makes it more convenient. CP probably makes extra money on that plan.

                                A 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • A
                                  Alex Sage @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller I guess I could backup my parents\grandparents to my computer, and just backup my one computer.... Hm....

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • A
                                    Alex Sage
                                    last edited by

                                    On second thought, then you lose the versioning on each PC. No thanks!

                                    dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • dafyreD
                                      dafyre @Alex Sage
                                      last edited by dafyre

                                      @aaronstuder said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                                      On second thought, then you lose the versioning on each PC. No thanks!

                                      But you can, actually. :-)... Use Crashplan to back up your computer. Then set up the Free code on your granparents computer and it will back up to your computer as well.... Then you just add the folder where Crashplan puts your grandparents backups into the online backup bits, and done. 🙂

                                      Edit: This is what I am doing with my Laptop at home... Laptop backs up (via Crashplan) to big computer... big computer backs up online.

                                      A JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • A
                                        Alex Sage @dafyre
                                        last edited by

                                        @dafyre your evil 🙂 I like it 😄

                                        dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • dafyreD
                                          dafyre @Alex Sage
                                          last edited by

                                          @aaronstuder said in BackBlaze vs. CrashPlan:

                                          @dafyre your evil 🙂 I like it 😄

                                          I prefer to call it creatively inclined. 🙂

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                          • C
                                            ChristopherBB @Dashrender
                                            last edited by

                                            @Dashrender Using the manual backup schedule setting, both the indexing and upload processes are triggered when the "Backup Now" button is selected. Both of those processes can also be started via command line, but there is a lockout if the indexing or upload processes initiate too often.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 4
                                            • 3 / 4
                                            • First post
                                              Last post