Mitel 5000 + Unified Messaging + Required Fax Server
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
Scott, not everyone dwells on the minutia that you do. I know that a modem is a modem - it was his way of expressing that the Mitel could not accept a fax directly inside itself.
Maybe they should That he said fax modem should have been a tip off. Does the Mitel really have no modem capabilities at all?
Actually I know that it does - that's how they manage them remotely for the most part. Of course as customers move to SIP, this particular vendor is asking for a site to site VPN to be setup so they can manage the phone system remotely.
damnit - I'm I'm getting mad again lol
-
@Dashrender said:
it was his way of expressing that the Mitel could not accept a fax directly inside itself.
Remember that we work in IT, a very technical field. If someone expresses themselves inaccurately it indicates that they likely are not comfortable with the information. If he really knew how this worked, do you feel that he would have said that? It's possible that the Mitel simply lacks all faxing capabilities, but there is also good reason to believe that he was just confused.
The ability to express something is fundamental to understanding it.
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
Scott, not everyone dwells on the minutia that you do. I know that a modem is a modem - it was his way of expressing that the Mitel could not accept a fax directly inside itself.
Maybe they should That he said fax modem should have been a tip off. Does the Mitel really have no modem capabilities at all?
Actually I know that it does - that's how they manage them remotely for the most part. Of course as customers move to SIP, this particular vendor is asking for a site to site VPN to be setup so they can manage the phone system remotely.
damnit - I'm I'm getting mad again lol
Well, okay. It's possible that the modem is purely for remote management. I've seen that done before. Very odd that they would build in that capability only for that and not offer it for other tasks, but who knows.
-
You need to get a MultiTech FaxFinder and an Analog Hunt Group license on your 5000. If you have PRI you assign a DID to each user and they get a PDF in their email from the fax being sent, install the software on their desktop and they can drag and drop PDF, MS Office docs, etc into the program and fax back out to whomever they desire by typing the number into the program. I have done probably 30 of these or more and they work great. Training the users to understand and accept new technology is the hump in deployment.
-
I have ditched my PRI for SIP trunks.
I do still have analog lines for faxes though.
-
@404d said:
You need to get a MultiTech FaxFinder and an Analog Hunt Group license on your 5000. If you have PRI you assign a DID to each user and they get a PDF in their email from the fax being sent, install the software on their desktop and they can drag and drop PDF, MS Office docs, etc into the program and fax back out to whomever they desire by typing the number into the program. I have done probably 30 of these or more and they work great. Training the users to understand and accept new technology is the hump in deployment.
Did you install MultiTech FaxFinder on a server to actually accept the faxes? or is the 5000 actually handling the faxes? You don't mention anything about modems.. so I just want to know the flow.
-
As long as you have DIDs available to dedicate to users you can do it with SIP trunking also. Analog trunks really limit you because you need a dedicated number per email address to properly setup the call/fax routing to email function. Otherwise with analog you would have to set an alias as a destination to hit a group of employee emails or a network share for the destination and have users check the share or get annoyed with a group email every time a fax is sent and that takes also takes security out of the delivery having a group of people having access to the document versus a 1 to 1 routing with DID directly to the intended party.
-
The 5000 routes the calls to the FaxFinder via analog port to a modem or modems in the FaxFinder depending on the model, or over IP from the 5000 to the FaxFinder as a SIP endpoint and the FaxFinder then receives the document and delivers it via email or to a network share. Its a pretty flexible solution.
-
OK - yeah, that's a completely normal Fax Server solution - definitely not the direction I was hoping to go.
We don't have faxes for people, we only have one fax number for the whole company. All those faxes are saved to a central network share.
I don't want to expand faxing, and definitely don't want 100 DIDs so everyone could have their own "fax line"
Thanks though
-
Pretty much plan on the 5000 being a "gateway" for faxing. It won't ever be able to handle the fax/pdf/email conversion on it's own or alert users of incoming or received documents. However you can have it setup as a fax on demand from the auto-attendant that holds ~10 documents that callers can request be sent from the 5000 SD to what ever number they put into the IVR. You will always have to use the FaxFinder or something like Fax Server Pro along with it. With the near certain death of the fax once the baby boomer generation is gone I don't think anything will even support it anymore. Sorry I couldn't help you get to where you were hoping to end up with the UVM.
-
@Dashrender said:
OK - yeah, that's a completely normal Fax Server solution - definitely not the direction I was hoping to go.
We don't have faxes for people, we only have one fax number for the whole company. All those faxes are saved to a central network share.
I don't want to expand faxing, and definitely don't want 100 DIDs so everyone could have their own "fax line"
Thanks though
Who goes through all of the faxes and how are they labeled as to make sense?
-
@wirestyle22 said:
@Dashrender said:
OK - yeah, that's a completely normal Fax Server solution - definitely not the direction I was hoping to go.
We don't have faxes for people, we only have one fax number for the whole company. All those faxes are saved to a central network share.
I don't want to expand faxing, and definitely don't want 100 DIDs so everyone could have their own "fax line"
Thanks though
Who goes through all of the faxes and how are they labeled as to make sense?
An employee.