P2V from Lenovo Laptop to Recover PST
-
On a PERSONAL level I help people like this all the time. Not breaking licensing but try to recover data from their drives.
But of course a company should not get involved in any illicit activity.
-
Nothing wrong with him trying to recover the data, as long as that is allowed (sounds like it is not.) He has means by which he can legally do that. It's only company policy stating that he cannot.
-
Clone the drive (as a backup), then stick it into a desktop. Run windows repair(s) until it boots into safe mode, do the needful, bill the customer. Unsure what requires P2V etc etc
-
@BRRABill said:
On a PERSONAL level I help people like this all the time. Not breaking licensing but try to recover data from their drives.
But of course a company should not get involved in any illicit activity.
Refusing to do personal work on anyone's computers has been the best decision I ever made.
-
@IRJ said:
@BRRABill said:
On a PERSONAL level I help people like this all the time. Not breaking licensing but try to recover data from their drives.
But of course a company should not get involved in any illicit activity.
Refusing to do personal work on anyone's computers has been the best decision I ever made.
Preach it!
-
@IRJ said:
Refusing to do personal work on anyone's computers has been the best decision I ever made.
Yeah not sure I can do it.
-
@MattSpeller said:
Clone the drive (as a backup), then stick it into a desktop. Run windows repair(s) until it boots into safe mode, do the needful, bill the customer. Unsure what requires P2V etc etc
Can you legally boot a copy of Machine1 on Machine2 like this?
-
@BRRABill said:
@IRJ said:
Refusing to do personal work on anyone's computers has been the best decision I ever made.
Yeah not sure I can do it.
I stopped years ago. I don't work on family machines, friends' machines... nothing. There is nothing good that can come from that.
-
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
Clone the drive (as a backup), then stick it into a desktop. Run windows repair(s) until it boots into safe mode, do the needful, bill the customer. Unsure what requires P2V etc etc
Can you legally boot a copy of Machine1 on Machine2 like this?
If it is FPP, yes. If it is OEM, no.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
Clone the drive (as a backup), then stick it into a desktop. Run windows repair(s) until it boots into safe mode, do the needful, bill the customer. Unsure what requires P2V etc etc
Can you legally boot a copy of Machine1 on Machine2 like this?
If it is FPP, yes. If it is OEM, no.
I'd love to get some feedback from a MS rep for this. It seems insane to screw a customer for such a minor thing.
-
@MattSpeller said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
Clone the drive (as a backup), then stick it into a desktop. Run windows repair(s) until it boots into safe mode, do the needful, bill the customer. Unsure what requires P2V etc etc
Can you legally boot a copy of Machine1 on Machine2 like this?
If it is FPP, yes. If it is OEM, no.
I'd love to get some feedback from a MS rep for this. It seems insane to screw a customer for such a minor thing.
You and I both know nothing would ever come of it, but I am pretty sure a MS rep is going to state the legalities and leave it at that.
-
@MattSpeller said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
Clone the drive (as a backup), then stick it into a desktop. Run windows repair(s) until it boots into safe mode, do the needful, bill the customer. Unsure what requires P2V etc etc
Can you legally boot a copy of Machine1 on Machine2 like this?
If it is FPP, yes. If it is OEM, no.
I'd love to get some feedback from a MS rep for this. It seems insane to screw a customer for such a minor thing.
They've commented before. Nothing new here. OEM restores are extremely clear. And it is not MS screwing anyone, it is...
- The wrong way to do a restore.
- The customer's option to have used OEM rather than FPP, they already saved money giving up this feature
- Not MS' fault that the customer didn't take a backup of any sort, anywhere.
-
@IRJ said:
You and I both know nothing would ever come of it, but I am pretty sure a MS rep is going to state the legalities and leave it at that.
What else is there to state. Customer made decisions, had tons of ways to not have this happened and now that they have not been proactive are hoping that MS will cover their butts for them.
There ARE options here, even now the reasons that we can't do a restore are a Staples' decision. In no way is MS blocking any recovery.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I stopped years ago. I don't work on family machines, friends' machines... nothing. There is nothing good that can come from that.
I don't have the chutzpah.
-
@MattSpeller said:
It seems insane to screw a customer for such a minor thing.
That is what I have been saying forever now.
And trust me, many more people do this than do it the legal way. (Not me.) You want to look like a hero and save the data, or the guy saying "sorry".
-
@MattSpeller said:
It seems insane to screw a customer for such a minor thing.
It makes NO SENSE to not allow this.
It's good for the customer (they get their data back).
It's good for MS (they don't lose customers to Apple because "their products suck".) -
@BRRABill said:
@MattSpeller said:
It seems insane to screw a customer for such a minor thing.
It makes NO SENSE to not allow this.
It makes NO SENSE to have opted to give up this feature and now blame the company that gave you a discount for giving it up for a decision that they left up to the customer.
It makes EVERY sense for MS not not allow this. How can this in any way be seen as illogical on MS' part?
-
@BRRABill said:
It's good for MS (they don't lose customers to Apple because "their products suck".)
No, it is not good for MS to "give in" when a customer opted to not take backups, not pay for the correct licensing and now want someone ELSE to pay for their mistakes. Not good at all.
This doesn't just undermine Microsoft, it undermines all of IT if we can always just "expect someone else" to fix any mistake we make, any planning that we didn't do.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
It makes EVERY sense for MS not not allow this. How can this in any way be seen as illogical on MS' part?
Data recovery should not be tied to licensing. You should be allowed to get your data back by ANY means possible.
Thank goodness MS isn't involved in the medical field.
DOCTOR: We could have saved him, if only we hadn't (unknowingly) given up our rights.
-
@BRRABill said:
It's good for the customer (they get their data back).
This has nothing whatsoever to do with getting data back. That they already have. It is a combination of going to a store that is refusing to do the recovery and trying to do everything except just recover the files that is the issue. Any discussion of this being about recovering data is misdirection. This is about attempting to misuse a license and nothing more.
