UniFi Cloud Key
-
@brianlittlejohn said:
@JaredBusch I'm not going to make any remote changes I'm not sure of when I don't have the time to drive to the site (4 hour round trip)
I was thinking the same as Jared, but I suppose your reasoning makes sense.
Though.. that said, do your UAPs check-in with your controller now? or were they setup with a controller on your laptop that isn't there any more? If they don't check in, or at least weren't setup by the controller at your main office, then adding unifi to your DNS won't matter.
Also don't forget, the DHCP server that's handing out IPs at the remote location needs to handout DNS entries for YOUR DNS servers, not the ISPs.
-
@brianlittlejohn said:
@JaredBusch I'm not going to make any remote changes I'm not sure of when I don't have the time to drive to the site (4 hour round trip)
It is a DNS entry.
If you do it right, then the AP shows up in your controller after the AP next reboots, or decides to recheck DNS after heartbeat failure.If you do it wrong, nothing visibly happens because the AP will still not point at your controller.
-
@JaredBusch said:
@brianlittlejohn said:
@JaredBusch I'm not going to make any remote changes I'm not sure of when I don't have the time to drive to the site (4 hour round trip)
It is a DNS entry.
If you do it right, then the AP shows up in your controller after the AP next reboots, or decides to recheck DNS after heartbeat failure.That part is easy... the issue will be changing controllers from what I used (which was on my laptop), to set it up to the controller at the main office. I don't imagine it going well and want to have the time available for me to go out there when it doesn't.
-
@brianlittlejohn said:
@JaredBusch said:
@brianlittlejohn said:
@JaredBusch I'm not going to make any remote changes I'm not sure of when I don't have the time to drive to the site (4 hour round trip)
It is a DNS entry.
If you do it right, then the AP shows up in your controller after the AP next reboots, or decides to recheck DNS after heartbeat failure.That part is easy... the issue will be changing controllers from what I used (which was on my laptop), to set it up to the controller at the main office. I don't imagine it going well and want to have the time available for me to go out there when it doesn't.
I've migrated entire clients sites from various on site controllers to my single off site controller.
There is seriously nothing to it. You make the new site in the controller, add the wireless network, then wait for the AP to show up on the default network needing adopted. Once there, you adopt it and move it to the appropriate site.
The UAP will not change their programming just because they see a new controller. That happens when you adopt them into the controller.
-
@brianlittlejohn said:
That part is easy... the issue will be changing controllers from what I used (which was on my laptop), to set it up to the controller at the main office. I don't imagine it going well and want to have the time available for me to go out there when it doesn't.
You're right. You'll have to rest the UAPs and attach them to the controller in the main office. You'll probably need to be onsite to reset the UAPs since you don't have an active controller controlling them now.
-
@Dashrender said:
@brianlittlejohn said:
That part is easy... the issue will be changing controllers from what I used (which was on my laptop), to set it up to the controller at the main office. I don't imagine it going well and want to have the time available for me to go out there when it doesn't.
You're right. You'll have to rest the UAPs and attach them to the controller in the main office. You'll probably need to be onsite to reset the UAPs since you don't have an active controller controlling them now.
You do not have to reset the UAP unless something is wrong with them. Even if there is, the bonus is that because it needs reset, the DNS changes will not affect it.
-
@JaredBusch said:
@brianlittlejohn said:
@JaredBusch said:
@brianlittlejohn said:
@JaredBusch I'm not going to make any remote changes I'm not sure of when I don't have the time to drive to the site (4 hour round trip)
It is a DNS entry.
If you do it right, then the AP shows up in your controller after the AP next reboots, or decides to recheck DNS after heartbeat failure.That part is easy... the issue will be changing controllers from what I used (which was on my laptop), to set it up to the controller at the main office. I don't imagine it going well and want to have the time available for me to go out there when it doesn't.
I've migrated entire clients sites from various on site controllers to my single off site controller.
There is seriously nothing to it. You make the new site in the controller, add the wireless network, then wait for the AP to show up on the default network needing adopted. Once there, you adopt it and move it to the appropriate site.
The UAP will not change their programming just because they see a new controller. That happens when you adopt them into the controller.
Jared, will the new controller even list the AP since the AP is configured for a different controller? That would seem very bad if you could just steal APs at will like that. i.e. I don't like your company, I find some way to bring my rouge controller up on your network, see all of your APs (OK I've poisoned the DNS too, yeah I'm reaching, but go with me) now I can just just steal your APs onto my controller.
I was pretty sure I read you had to reset the AP to change them to a new controller. Of course the reset can be performed by the trusted controller, then when it resets, all controllers would see the AP as a non associated AP or you can press the rest button on the device.
-
@Dashrender @JaredBusch Im worried that with the previous experience I had with them starting the adoption then not communicating again that it may happen again... Anyways this is not a big deal, one AP in a small office. I dont have a very big UNIFI infrastructure anyways... im running Cisco APs at the main office (as they fail I will replace them with a different brand) I'll just have it on my agenda next time I decide/have to go out to that site to play with it some more.
-
This is almost a poor man's Meraki.
-
@Dashrender said:
This is almost a poor man's Meraki.
Except it works better and is more powerful. It's more the smart man's Meraki
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
This is almost a poor man's Meraki.
Except it works better and is more powerful.
You're going to need to explain that one to me. There don't seem to be near the options in Unifi that Meraki has.
-
@Dashrender What useful features do you see missing? And you have to compare things like "features" to things like performance, cost and reliability. It takes a LOT of "features" to overcome performance, for example.
-
The traffic analysis stuff in Meraki can be pretty nice (though expensive) knowing that one AP, network connection/whatever is swamping your network watching YouTube videos, etc.
-
@Dashrender said:
The traffic analysis stuff in Meraki can be pretty nice (though expensive) knowing that one AP, network connection/whatever is swamping your network watching YouTube videos, etc.
While nice that it is built in and really easy to get to, this is generally a really rare thing to want and not a feature unique to Meraki, you can get that info from Ubiquiti gear too.
-
It just arrived!
-
@anonymous said:
It just arrived!
And....? How is it?
-
Did the device change?
I don't recall the original pictures indicating the need for power through Micro USB.
This current model appears to require an ethernet cable between the switch and the device, the old one from memory had a built in RJ45 to plug directly into the switch. Of course, I can see where that might be undesirable, I am just checking to see how crazy I am today.
-
@Dashrender said:
I am just checking to see how crazy I am today.No comment.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
You have offices big enough to run UniFi gear but too small for a single server? Not that that seems impossible just unlikely.
Yeah, and a Raspberry pi can run this and a lot cheaper too. and can do other stuff.. This is obsolete when they start changing their platform much.
-
@Dashrender said:
Did the device change?
I don't recall the original pictures indicating the need for power through Micro USB.
Looks like it's incase you don't have PoE for it.
