So, there was a RC "drone" hovering above my house yesterday...I was kinda pissed.
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
Basically, they're going to have to come up with some new laws to cover drones, aren't they? You can't have strangers legally filming children playing in their own garden - it's not going to happen.
I can't speak for the UK, but it's happening right now. In the US if there is line of sight to those children from a public space, they most definitely can be legally allowed to be recorded/photographed.
-
It's probably the same in the UK. What happens is photographers just get hassled by the police who don't care about, or understand, the law.
-
@Carnival-Boy said:
It's probably the same in the UK. What happens is photographers just get hassled by the police who don't care about, or understand, the law.
We have that same problem here.
-
@Dashrender said:
@mlnews said:
@Carnival-Boy said:
Taking it down with a boomerang would be pretty cool. Though I'm sure that just because something is on your property doesn't mean you have a right to destroy it (in the UK at least).
In much of the US you can shoot PEOPLE if they are on your property and don't leave. Pretty sure in Texas you can just open fire. Just yell "get off my property" and if the drone doesn't run for it you are free and clear to open fire.
You're talking about the castle doctrine, right?
Can't do that here unless there's immediate threat of harm or death to you (to you only, not your property).
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Dashrender said:
@mlnews said:
@Carnival-Boy said:
Taking it down with a boomerang would be pretty cool. Though I'm sure that just because something is on your property doesn't mean you have a right to destroy it (in the UK at least).
In much of the US you can shoot PEOPLE if they are on your property and don't leave. Pretty sure in Texas you can just open fire. Just yell "get off my property" and if the drone doesn't run for it you are free and clear to open fire.
You're talking about the castle doctrine, right?
Can't do that here unless there's immediate threat of harm or death to you (to you only, not your property).
I'm guessing that Scott has squirreled away somewhere a list of articles that show Texans just shooting anyone at any time for any reason and then getting off scott free.
-
@Dashrender said:
I'm guessing that Scott has squirreled away somewhere a list of articles that show Texans just shooting anyone at any time for any reason and then getting off scott free.
I can probably find an article that says I own the moon.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Dashrender said:
I'm guessing that Scott has squirreled away somewhere a list of articles that show Texans just shooting anyone at any time for any reason and then getting off scott free.
I can probably find an article that says I own the moon.
yes, but would it be a creditable source?
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@Dashrender said:
@mlnews said:
@Carnival-Boy said:
Taking it down with a boomerang would be pretty cool. Though I'm sure that just because something is on your property doesn't mean you have a right to destroy it (in the UK at least).
In much of the US you can shoot PEOPLE if they are on your property and don't leave. Pretty sure in Texas you can just open fire. Just yell "get off my property" and if the drone doesn't run for it you are free and clear to open fire.
You're talking about the castle doctrine, right?
Can't do that here unless there's immediate threat of harm or death to you (to you only, not your property).
Texas allows property or even nothing more than "criminal mischief" if at night...
http://texasstatepolitics.blogspot.com/2007/11/to-shoot-or-not-to-shoot.html
-
Legality of flying it in XYZ place aside...
http://www.ladyada.net/make/wavebubble/faq.html
So jamming is kinda illegal, microwave guns are a cool idea on paper but suck in reality (I made one).
Only option I can see is to employ a kinetic energy kill. I'd suggest 12ga 3.5" magnum BB turkey loads with an extra full choke. Always know where the pellets are going to land.
-
@MattSpeller said:
Legality of flying it in XYZ place aside...
http://www.ladyada.net/make/wavebubble/faq.html
So jamming is kinda illegal, microwave guns are a cool idea on paper but suck in reality (I made one).
Only option I can see is to employ a kinetic energy kill. I'd suggest 12ga 3.5" magnum BB turkey loads with an extra full choke. Always know where the pellets are going to land.
Hmmm.... this implies that Faraday Cages would be a problem then since it blocks and interferes with an authorized source, right?
The big question is.... is a drone considered an authorized or licensed station? Easily might be, but I have no idea if that is true.
-
@mlnews said:
Hmmm.... this implies that Faraday Cages would be a problem then since it blocks and interferes with an authorized source, right?
100% true. If you build a faraday cage around a radio station I promise you someone will call the cops
The big question is.... is a drone considered an authorized or licensed station? Easily might be, but I have no idea if that is true.
Show me the license you need to fly a drone.
-
@MattSpeller said:
The big question is.... is a drone considered an authorized or licensed station? Easily might be, but I have no idea if that is true.
Show me the license you need to fly a drone.
It's unlicensed for normal uses (hobby) and a major FAA license for commercial. The FAA license, I think, provides all kinds of restrictions so that is completely different, I would imagine.
Its the unlicensed use that is the question. Is "allowed" the same as "authorized" in a legal document?
-
@MattSpeller said:
@mlnews said:
Hmmm.... this implies that Faraday Cages would be a problem then since it blocks and interferes with an authorized source, right?
100% true. If you build a faraday cage around a radio station I promise you someone will call the cops
BUt we are talking about someone moving a radio station onto your property. Can you not interfere with a radio station within your own space? That's the question. The wording suggests "no", but that's hard to say as is it interference if you are only interfering in your own space? One could argue that the drone was interfering with your signals as long as they are legal on their own, which they would be if the drone wasn't there.
So the question is, do the rights of the drone supersede the rights of the homeowner as to the jurisdiction of radio waves in the airspace around your home?
-
Another way to look at it, if you build a faraday cage around your property and someone sneaks onto your property and their cell phone doesn't work.... are you interfering with their authorized station?
-
And in the cell phone case, they are both authorized AND licensed.
-
You can't limit your jamming to just your own property though, and a faraday cage, if you want to build a structure around your allowed space, land size by allowed airspace, then you are probably in your rights to do so - but then again maybe not.
Think about this... Let's say you create a faraday cage of your whole home and that somehow blocks your neighbors ability to receive the local TV/Radio station signals because you are line of sight between them and the towers... would that be legal?
-
@Dashrender said:
Let's say you create a faraday cage of your whole home and that somehow blocks your neighbors ability to receive the local TV/Radio station signals ...... would that be legal?
Yes, at least here. Ditto the faraday cage across your property provided you got a permit to install it.
-
I think we're into some pretty murky legal grounds that make me wish I'd gone to law school to get rich off sorting this all out
-
@Dashrender said:
You can't limit your jamming to just your own property though, and a faraday cage, if you want to build a structure around your allowed space, land size by allowed airspace, then you are probably in your rights to do so - but then again maybe not.
Think about this... Let's say you create a faraday cage of your whole home and that somehow blocks your neighbors ability to receive the local TV/Radio station signals because you are line of sight between them and the towers... would that be legal?
Hopefully that would be legal as building a house can do the same thing and you are allowed to have houses. Tress, houses, etc. interfere with radio signals all the time. Thing about how easily you could get point to point wireless if no human property was allowed to be in the way!!
-
@MattSpeller said:
I think we're into some pretty murky legal grounds that make me wish I'd gone to law school to get rich off sorting this all out
It's murky, mostly because the law is so poor. The law should not be "up to the person reading it." It is designed, in America, to make everyone illegal no matter what they do. A judge can always find you guilty, they just need to interpret the law however they like. The law isn't written in a way that even an attorney could reliably tell you how it would be read. And it isn't like judges have to go to law school, they are just officials. Sometimes highly trained, sometimes not at all. So what can seem like crystal clear law can turn into the opposite of what you think.
