Non-IT News Thread
-
I didn't believe the whole roaming gangs in London.. until I witnessed a 20's something kid run into a 50+ man and they almost came to blows... only the old man's wife pulling him back kept them from going at it... I've never been to NYC, but Dallas, Orlando, LA, SF - I've NEVER seen anything like this.
-
It's leading to ask if I've ever met a mass murder, that makes it sound like maybe these gun nuts never become mass murders. But I know people who've been SHOT by gun nuts, just not the gun nuts themselves.
-
@Dashrender said:
I didn't believe the whole roaming gangs in London.. until I witnessed a 20's something kid run into a 50+ man and they almost came to blows... only the old man's wife pulling him back kept them from going at it... I've never been to NYC, but Dallas, Orlando, LA, SF - I've NEVER seen anything like this.
I've walked miles through what are supposed to be the absolute worst parts of London, never saw anything that made me even keep my eyes low or worry. I've walked the whole east Docklands at twilight. I walked across London six miles just this past May, not a worry in the world, at 1am - 4am.
London is certainly more dangerous than most of Europe. But that's only because Europe is so insanely safe. But Dallas, Houston, Orlando, LA.... are so much more dangerous.
You are, I think, letting one anecdote in a big city make you fearful of what logically is the safer choice. Like seeing a plane crash on the news and driving instead of flying no matter how much more dangerous driving is. You need to look at the stats. And the stats say that both the US and guns make places more dangerous. It's consistent data.
And did those Brits have guns?
-
You also have to keep in mind that you are white and affluent. Your fear level in American cities is not very indicative of their actual safety.
-
Not sure how this list gets made, but notice that the US makes the Top Ten list with a city in our richest state and is comparable to cities literally in war zones and in the drug war areas:
http://americanlivewire.com/2014-02-16-10-most-dangerous-cities-2014-camden/
-
In other news...
LLAMAS!
http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/flash/llama
Youtube Video -
@scottalanmiller said:
The US has a recent epidemic of mass shootings from these people.
Prove it.
All of the shootings I am aware of have been lone mentally unstable individuals or individuals acting with the assistance of Islamic extremeist (another whack job nutter group).
-
@JaredBusch said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The US has a recent epidemic of mass shootings from these people.
Prove it.
All of the shootings I am aware of have been lone mentally unstable individuals or individuals acting with the assistance of Islamic extremeist (another whack job nutter group).
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-follman-rise-in-mass-shootings-20141020-story.html
Since 2011 a mass shooting happes every 64 days.
Every one of them has guns. That's how they become shootings. I'm not aware of any where they got the guns from the victims. They all had guns before they went to shoot everyone.
-
@JaredBusch said:
All of the shootings I am aware of have been lone mentally unstable individuals or individuals acting with the assistance of Islamic extremeist (another whack job nutter group).
Aren't these just ways to describe anyone who is shooting lots of people? Of course people shooting other people are mentally unstable. But they all come from groups with access to guns, or nearly all. And one could argue that people walking around brandishing weapons in public alone constitutes being mentally unstable.
I'm only saying that people who carry around guns are the ones that shoot people, most of the time.
-
The issues that I'm pointing out are these two anecdotes:
- I never see anyone, mass shooter or just general gun nut, toting around this kind of hardware. It's rare enough that I've never once seen it in public.
- What case of mass shootings would the person on their way to the shooting have not been "just another gun nut" until they opened fire?
The only people I hear about carrying these weapons are the people who decided to use them (except that crazy guy in Atlanta.)
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@JaredBusch said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The US has a recent epidemic of mass shootings from these people.
Prove it.
All of the shootings I am aware of have been lone mentally unstable individuals or individuals acting with the assistance of Islamic extremeist (another whack job nutter group).
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-follman-rise-in-mass-shootings-20141020-story.html
Since 2011 a mass shooting happes every 64 days.
Every one of them has guns. That's how they become shootings. I'm not aware of any where they got the guns from the victims. They all had guns before they went to shoot everyone.
if anything this proves that citizens having guns out in public doesn't make put them in more danger... if anything it has proven the opposite (conceal carry holders saving other peoples lives).
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@JaredBusch said:
All of the shootings I am aware of have been lone mentally unstable individuals or individuals acting with the assistance of Islamic extremeist (another whack job nutter group).
Aren't these just ways to describe anyone who is shooting lots of people? Of course people shooting other people are mentally unstable. But they all come from groups with access to guns, or nearly all. And one could argue that people walking around brandishing weapons in public alone constitutes being mentally unstable.
I'm only saying that people who carry around guns are the ones that shoot people, most of the time.
Uh, well, you can only be shot by someone carrying around guns, unless you take a gun from someone at the scene which you admitted rarely happens.
These nutters who are walking around with assault weapons around their shoulders aren't the ones that then later go out on killing sprees...
-
@Dashrender said:
@scottalanmiller said:
@JaredBusch said:
@scottalanmiller said:
The US has a recent epidemic of mass shootings from these people.
Prove it.
All of the shootings I am aware of have been lone mentally unstable individuals or individuals acting with the assistance of Islamic extremeist (another whack job nutter group).
http://www.latimes.com/opinion/op-ed/la-oe-follman-rise-in-mass-shootings-20141020-story.html
Since 2011 a mass shooting happes every 64 days.
Every one of them has guns. That's how they become shootings. I'm not aware of any where they got the guns from the victims. They all had guns before they went to shoot everyone.
if anything this proves that citizens having guns out in public doesn't make put them in more danger... if anything it has proven the opposite (conceal carry holders saving other peoples lives).
How does it prove that? How many concealed carriers have stopped how many shootings compared to countries where they can't have guns at all? The numbers do not suggest what you are saying. Name any country where not having access to guns has led to more public shootings.
-
@Dashrender said:
These nutters who are walking around with assault weapons around their shoulders aren't the ones that then later go out on killing sprees...
Aren't they? Isn't nearly every mass shooting some guy with an assault weapon on his shoulder right up until he starts shooting? I'm not saying that every one of these people is a mass murder yet, I'm saying that everyone shooting people with an assault weapon was one of these guys up until he pulled the trigger in public.
Am I missing something? How are the mass shooters not assault weapons carriers prior to the shootings?
-
I'm only comparing us against ourselves.. not against other countries where guns are rare or flat out illegal.
-
@Dashrender said:
if anything it has proven the opposite (conceal carry holders saving other peoples lives).
I'd rather have hundreds of people not shot than get to brag about saving a few once they are being shot at. Concealed weapon "successes" at the expense of deaths is still a loss.
-
@Dashrender said:
I'm only comparing us against ourselves.. not against other countries where guns are rare or flat out illegal.
What is there to compare against? We are a single place with access to guns. You have to compare to where you can't have nutters with assault weapons walk up to the people that they are going to shoot with impunity to know if the ability to do so protects or harms.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
These nutters who are walking around with assault weapons around their shoulders aren't the ones that then later go out on killing sprees...
Aren't they? Isn't nearly every mass shooting some guy with an assault weapon on his shoulder right up until he starts shooting? I'm not saying that every one of these people is a mass murder yet, I'm saying that everyone shooting people with an assault weapon was one of these guys up until he pulled the trigger in public.
Am I missing something? How are the mass shooters not assault weapons carriers prior to the shootings?
because they aren't out in public scaring you. Those crazy people who go on shooting sprees are generally loners, rarely showing off their arsenal.
-
You could make a far more compelling case by saying that Americans are just naturally violent, that we have a violent culture or that race and religious tensions cause mass violence and that the country is unique and that guns are an artifact of that, not the cause. That would be a far more compelling argument. But if you only look at gun figures, the proliferation of guns in the US is negative from every angle. The more guns you have, the more people die from violence.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Dashrender said:
if anything it has proven the opposite (conceal carry holders saving other peoples lives).
I'd rather have hundreds of people not shot than get to brag about saving a few once they are being shot at. Concealed weapon "successes" at the expense of deaths is still a loss.
I wasn't bragging, but thanks for that.
