ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Microsoft Self-Audit Letter

    IT Discussion
    11
    66
    15.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • NetworkNerdN
      NetworkNerd @Minion Queen
      last edited by NetworkNerd

      @Minion-Queen said:

      Yeah the IT Admin there must have heard about that one. We were brought in for this project and I am glad we could help them. But I am sure the discussion with his boss wasn't a pleasant one.

      I don't see that as being a pleasant experience either.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • C
        Carnival Boy
        last edited by

        In some places I've worked it's been the owner that is a bit too casual with licences. I've often come in and had to persuade them that being "mostly licenced" isn't really acceptable.

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @Carnival Boy
          last edited by

          @Carnival-Boy said:

          In some places I've worked it's been the owner that is a bit too casual with licences. I've often come in and had to persuade them that being "mostly licenced" isn't really acceptable.

          That's a natural problem with owners. An owner gets the "it's my money" feeling about licenses and sees them as him spending his own income on things he can't tangibly hold. Managers don't normally have this problem because they don't have the same sense of loss - the money that they spend is the business' money and the licenses are just a cost of doing business. No reason for an honest manager to have any qualms with paying for what is used. But owners get emotional.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • garak0410G
            garak0410
            last edited by

            I got an MLS...no SQL license to be found and no way to prove it...all we have is a SQL 2008 R2 for Workgroups with 5 user CALS. If I got a core license and downgraded to 2008 R2, can that still apply for the WORKGROUP version of SQL or do I need to purchase a new copy of SQL?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • NetworkNerdN
              NetworkNerd @JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @JaredBusch said:

              I had this at one client back in March.

              We had already performed our own internal audit and new that we needed some office licensing (10 licenses off 2013 Standard). We were going to purchase them over 3 months to spread out the impact on the numbers to cross two fiscal quarters. That ended up not happening.

              I found nothing else wrong during the audit other than some misapplied keys. Was quite pleased to not have any surprises.

              In the case of misapplied keys, it's certainly something that needs to be resolved, but you're still compliant in terms of having the licenses you need to license all MS products for the company as long as you purchased everything needed to cover your bases, right? What I mean to say is...if you had not applied the right keys before confirming compliance and then MS found out you had misapplied keys, would that be a fine?

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • garak0410G
                garak0410
                last edited by garak0410

                Thanks for all of the advice...we found that we needed some licenses and we purchased them and are about to send in the letter.

                Thanks...
                Brian

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • 1
                • 2
                • 3
                • 4
                • 4 / 4
                • First post
                  Last post