Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
-
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
That's the DVR< that's the trivial part of this. I still think that that is bad, because you tie completely unnecessary things together in inflexible ways. But my point is that the controller being forced to one location is a huge problem. How do you manage multiple dream machines?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
It's a $380 router with an 8 port switch and NVR. I don't think anyone bigger than a single location would look at it.
The NVR by itself is $300.
It doesn't support CLI access so it's more of a prosumer/small office setup.
The NVR is enough to make me want it. Until this year I don't believe their NVR software was available past Ubuntu 14.04 (it may have been 16.04 but I don't think)
-
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
That's the DVR< that's the trivial part of this. I still think that that is bad, because you tie completely unnecessary things together in inflexible ways. But my point is that the controller being forced to one location is a huge problem. How do you manage multiple dream machines?
Their cloud offering. As far as I know, it still works with their cloud interface.
-
It has a built in cloud key. So it's just a normal controller. You'd manage it the same as any other.
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
It has a built in cloud key. So it's just a normal controller. You'd manage it the same as any other.
Exactly - you publish the controller to the web and the other sites remote into it.
Also, nothing saying you have to use THAT controller, just setup a vultr instance if you want.
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
It's a $380 router with an 8 port switch and NVR. I don't think anyone bigger than a single location would look at it.
The NVR by itself is $300.
It doesn't support CLI access so it's more of a prosumer/small office setup.
The NVR is enough to make me want it. Until this year I don't believe their NVR software was available past Ubuntu 14.04 (it may have been 16.04 but I don't think)
I guess if you are looking at it as an NVR for a single site mom and pop, and the whole thing is to be an NVR and it just comes with a tiny networking setup to go with it...
They make a dedicated NVR server still, I thought. It's new.
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
That's the DVR< that's the trivial part of this. I still think that that is bad, because you tie completely unnecessary things together in inflexible ways. But my point is that the controller being forced to one location is a huge problem. How do you manage multiple dream machines?
Their cloud offering. As far as I know, it still works with their cloud interface.
I don't think so. That's why we've avoided it at all costs. It says all over the place "cannot be joined to a controller."
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
It has a built in cloud key. So it's just a normal controller. You'd manage it the same as any other.
No, it's like Windows Essentials. You can't manage it like enterprise AD where you have multiple in an environment. Each device has to be on its dedicated internal controller. No central management, no enterprise hosting, no cloud.
-
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Exactly - you publish the controller to the web and the other sites remote into it.
So you use the dinky consumer grade dreammachine as your hub, and all the enterprise devices that are higher end hook to it? See why I see this as a weird setup?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
That's the DVR< that's the trivial part of this. I still think that that is bad, because you tie completely unnecessary things together in inflexible ways. But my point is that the controller being forced to one location is a huge problem. How do you manage multiple dream machines?
Their cloud offering. As far as I know, it still works with their cloud interface.
I don't think so. That's why we've avoided it at all costs. It says all over the place "cannot be joined to a controller."
You can attach it to your cloud account. From what I've seen that's currently the only way to do it. It's not a single interface, but I think they're working on that if I remember right.
-
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Also, nothing saying you have to use THAT controller, just setup a vultr instance if you want.
Everything I've seen says you absolutely have to use that controller, and only that controller.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
It has a built in cloud key. So it's just a normal controller. You'd manage it the same as any other.
No, it's like Windows Essentials. You can't manage it like enterprise AD where you have multiple in an environment. Each device has to be on its dedicated internal controller. No central management, no enterprise hosting, no cloud.
You're right, it's attached to your cloud account. You can manage it through there, but it's a different controller in each environment. I guess I counted that as single management point.
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
That's the DVR< that's the trivial part of this. I still think that that is bad, because you tie completely unnecessary things together in inflexible ways. But my point is that the controller being forced to one location is a huge problem. How do you manage multiple dream machines?
Their cloud offering. As far as I know, it still works with their cloud interface.
I don't think so. That's why we've avoided it at all costs. It says all over the place "cannot be joined to a controller."
You can attach it to your cloud account. From what I've seen that's currently the only way to do it. It's not a single interface, but I think they're working on that if I remember right.
Oh, federated through an account, but not a central controller. Better than nothing but... really bad outside of a consumer or mom & pop size situation.
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
It has a built in cloud key. So it's just a normal controller. You'd manage it the same as any other.
No, it's like Windows Essentials. You can't manage it like enterprise AD where you have multiple in an environment. Each device has to be on its dedicated internal controller. No central management, no enterprise hosting, no cloud.
You're right, it's attached to your cloud account. You can manage it through there, but it's a different controller in each environment. I guess I counted that as single management point.
Well it's more than I realized you could do. So it's better than nothing.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
That's the DVR< that's the trivial part of this. I still think that that is bad, because you tie completely unnecessary things together in inflexible ways. But my point is that the controller being forced to one location is a huge problem. How do you manage multiple dream machines?
Their cloud offering. As far as I know, it still works with their cloud interface.
I don't think so. That's why we've avoided it at all costs. It says all over the place "cannot be joined to a controller."
You can attach it to your cloud account. From what I've seen that's currently the only way to do it. It's not a single interface, but I think they're working on that if I remember right.
Oh, federated through an account, but not a central controller. Better than nothing but... really bad outside of a consumer or mom & pop size situation.
I don't think it's marketed to anything more than that. Other than small shops that need WAN failover. I think it's still being developed a lot though.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
They make a dedicated NVR server still, I thought. It's new.
Yeah but the NVR is $300. Then you still need the other networking stuff. So this makes it reasonable, everything for $380.
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@Dashrender said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
Are you talking about the dream machine?
I sure hope not, that thing seems so dumb.
I can see the benefits for some people. It will also do IPS with full gig passthrough.
If I was running their cameras it would def be a plus to have the nvr and everything in the same rack unit.The speed is nice, but I sure don't want NVR or the controller in my router. It's crazy. It's like a cheesy consumer unit, in a rack form factor.
I guess I don't really see the downsides but that's fine.
Well, lacking the option of central management is huge. Who buys gear that large and is not just a single location, but designing around staying a single location? Someone, somewhere, but it's so niche.
Tons of businesses grow, sure, and they just install new camera systems at each location - perhaps that's not the best solution, but it's what they do. The pharmacy I recently assisted - new location, whole new onsite camera system, nothing centralized about it.
That's the DVR< that's the trivial part of this. I still think that that is bad, because you tie completely unnecessary things together in inflexible ways. But my point is that the controller being forced to one location is a huge problem. How do you manage multiple dream machines?
Their cloud offering. As far as I know, it still works with their cloud interface.
I don't think so. That's why we've avoided it at all costs. It says all over the place "cannot be joined to a controller."
You can attach it to your cloud account. From what I've seen that's currently the only way to do it. It's not a single interface, but I think they're working on that if I remember right.
Oh, federated through an account, but not a central controller. Better than nothing but... really bad outside of a consumer or mom & pop size situation.
I don't think it's marketed to anything more than that. Other than small shops that need WAN failover. I think it's still being developed a lot though.
I'm not sure. But the lack of USG upgrades means that end users seem to be looking at it at times that aren't those times because if "feels" like it's meant to be the replacement.
-
@stacksofplates said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
@scottalanmiller said in Router/firewall recommendations for small branch office:
They make a dedicated NVR server still, I thought. It's new.
Yeah but the NVR is $300. Then you still need the other networking stuff. So this makes it reasonable, everything for $380.
It's for bigger shops, I get that. Just saying you CAN host it.