ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Build SharePoint development farm

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    sharepointwindows server
    16 Posts 4 Posters 4.3k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      Which SharePoint version are you looking at?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • AmbarishrhA
        Ambarishrh
        last edited by

        Sharepoint 2013

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • AmbarishrhA
          Ambarishrh
          last edited by

          A good article on sharepoint application life cycle management

          http://zimmergren.net/business/automating-sharepoint-development-iterative-development-process

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @Ambarishrh
            last edited by

            @ambarishrh said:

            Sharepoint 2013

            I meant Foundation, Standard or Enterprise.

            Have you considered Office 365?

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DashrenderD
              Dashrender
              last edited by

              I was kinda wondering why O365 didn't seem to be on the table until I appeared that you are creating Sharepoint setups for clients, so that might not be possible on O365.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JoyJ
                Joy
                last edited by

                " (Actually busy on planning my wedding! 🙂 Yes, am getting married, should've been a bit more formal announcement than adding it on this post! 🙂 "
                Congrats in advance!! 🙂

                AmbarishrhA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • scottalanmillerS
                  scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  Congrats on the upcoming wedding, by the way!

                  AmbarishrhA 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • AmbarishrhA
                    Ambarishrh @scottalanmiller
                    last edited by

                    @scottalanmiller Its SharePoint 2013 Enterprise and we might sometimes need to test with Exchange server for intranet projects as well

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • AmbarishrhA
                      Ambarishrh @Joy
                      last edited by

                      @Joyfano said:

                      Congrats in advance!! 🙂
                      Thanks! 🙂

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • AmbarishrhA
                        Ambarishrh @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        Congrats on the upcoming wedding, by the way!

                        Thanks 🙂

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          A single, large server is probably much better. That way production can steal capacity from testing for free. More flexible in the long run.

                          AmbarishrhA 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • AmbarishrhA
                            Ambarishrh @scottalanmiller
                            last edited by

                            @scottalanmiller Thanks!

                            I am looking at a server with the below specs.
                            2 Intel® Xeon® E5-2690v2, 3.0GHz, 25M Cache, 8.0GT/s QPI, Turbo, HT, 10C, 130W, DDR3-1866MHz
                            128GB RAM

                            This way we could have the VMs fired up based on the solution required with multiple servers. Apart from that the usual things like TFS server, and a UAT server which will be always available.

                            The dev team each will have a Lenovo W540 laptop, Intel® Core™ i7-4930MX (Up to 3.0GHz, 8MB L3, 1600MHz FSB),32GB,512 GB SSD.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              That's a good server spec. Lots of power. Should work well.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • AmbarishrhA
                                Ambarishrh
                                last edited by

                                An update on this:

                                We got the servers and that is also with a SAN. I had some discussions with the dev team head for SP and he would like to have a self provisioning system for VMs. Since this will now be staging, as all dev team members have good 32GB machines to be used as local development. So now my path of research is on going with these 2 servers as independent servers, which has 600GBx2 HDDs, will set it up with RAID1 so on the 600GB usable space on each server, 100GB will be given for OS and the second drive of 500 GB will have master images for self provisioning. Use the SAN shared storage for the VM storage and then boot up instances as and when required for the projects. Use Visual studio online as TFS account which is offsite so its easy for dev team to access from outside. I would like to keep a copy of the TFS online files as a local copy+ may be add Veam backup for the HyperVs for snapshot backup to our other netapp as a backup just in case if something happens to servers. Makes sense?

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • AmbarishrhA
                                  Ambarishrh
                                  last edited by

                                  I need to add some process after discussing with the Project Managers, just to ensure that we don't end up using 100% resources of servers and if something new comes i will end up terminating some to accommodate new ones. Idea is to ensure to have some policies like, x number of hours/days needed to fire up x type of SP farm (single server, multi server- 6 servers, 8 servers etc), If there are new projects coming in, share the infrastructure proposal with us, so we can check if there are rooms for this new setup, if not order new servers to provision etc.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1 / 1
                                  • First post
                                    Last post