Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist
-
This is FireEye's way of letting everyone know that this is not a serious security summit. This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you. Security is not something you want to have guided by those who have failed.
-
-
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This is FireEye's way of letting everyone know that this is not a serious security summit. This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you. Security is not something you want to have guided by those who have failed.
I'd say it's FireEye letting everyone know that they are not a serious security company. Doesn't take someone in tech or security to know that she doesn't know about security at all.
-
Hmmm.... Fire eye has worked with HRC before during 2016 election.
http://fortune.com/2016/08/18/clinton-foundation-fireeye-hack-investigation/
-
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
-
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
Honestly it's a decent system. I'm not convinced it works very well but it covers the "Security Training" pieces of an audit. When we implemented it at my last job we did see a marked decrease in the number of people that clicked on spam/phishing links.
-
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
KnowBe4 is solid for the masses. Seriously a helpful product.
I do agree about the entire failed hacker bit though. I am not a Mitnick fan. But KnowBe4 did it for the name to the masses.
-
@JaredBusch said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
KnowBe4 is solid for the masses. Seriously a helpful product.
I do agree about the entire failed hacker bit though. I am not a Mitnick fan. But KnowBe4 did it for the name to the masses.
So the only hacker you can respect is one who never got caught? in which case you'd never likely hear about them - and definitely never see them on a stage - else they might be going to jail instead.
-
@Dashrender said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@JaredBusch said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
KnowBe4 is solid for the masses. Seriously a helpful product.
I do agree about the entire failed hacker bit though. I am not a Mitnick fan. But KnowBe4 did it for the name to the masses.
So the only hacker you can respect is one who never got caught? in which case you'd never likely hear about them - and definitely never see them on a stage - else they might be going to jail instead.
I didn't say that. But Mitnick is not someone I respect.
I used to know couple people that I suspected were real blackhats, but I never found out for certain. Either way, what I did know about them gave me a very health respect for how much I do not know.
-
@JaredBusch They hired Mitnik for his fame, limited as it is. Personally I think it was a bad decision. That said, their product is very good at teaching users not to do stupid things, and providing training compliance documentation. Beyond that, not much.
-
@Dashrender said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@JaredBusch said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
KnowBe4 is solid for the masses. Seriously a helpful product.
I do agree about the entire failed hacker bit though. I am not a Mitnick fan. But KnowBe4 did it for the name to the masses.
So the only hacker you can respect is one who never got caught? in which case you'd never likely hear about them - and definitely never see them on a stage - else they might be going to jail instead.
Exactly, conceptually having hackers represent anything is its own antithesis. It would be like seeing a "famous anonymous speaker." Can't happen. Hackers aren't someone you want speaking somewhere, ever. It's just illogical and is, essentially, really poor social engineering itself.
-
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
They use him in some things. but I've not seen them have him speak at a conference. KnowBe4 puts his face on things, but AFAIK, that's it. But I've been to a conference that actually presented him as if he was an "expert speaker", which tells you volumes about what they think of their audience.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
They use him in some things. but I've not seen them have him speak at a conference. KnowBe4 puts his face on things, but AFAIK, that's it. But I've been to a conference that actually presented him as if he was an "expert speaker", which tells you volumes about what they think of their audience.
cough
cough -
@travisdh1 said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
They use him in some things. but I've not seen them have him speak at a conference. KnowBe4 puts his face on things, but AFAIK, that's it. But I've been to a conference that actually presented him as if he was an "expert speaker", which tells you volumes about what they think of their audience.
cough
coughThat was the first time I heard him speak, really not impressive. A little bit on how to do social engineering, badly.
-
The title of this thread made me chuckle, so thanks for that
-
Due to pressure they changed their keynote speaker
-
@IRJ said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
Due to pressure they changed their keynote speaker
Yeah good call... Damage control at this point. Wow, just WOW.
-
@IRJ Still .... never going to live that down. FireEye burned absolutely every last shred of respectability on this one.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
They use him in some things. but I've not seen them have him speak at a conference. KnowBe4 puts his face on things, but AFAIK, that's it. But I've been to a conference that actually presented him as if he was an "expert speaker", which tells you volumes about what they think of their audience.
He is speaking at their conference this year
-
@IRJ said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@bnrstnr said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
@scottalanmiller said in Hillary Rodham Clinton - Security Specialist:
This would be like having someone who failed at being a hacker, like Kevin Mitnick, speak at a conference or represent you.
Shot at KnowBe4? People occasionally bring it up. It always seemed scammy to me.
They use him in some things. but I've not seen them have him speak at a conference. KnowBe4 puts his face on things, but AFAIK, that's it. But I've been to a conference that actually presented him as if he was an "expert speaker", which tells you volumes about what they think of their audience.
He is speaking at their conference this year
Yeah, I realize it's just a marketing front. But it's impossible for me to think of them in any serious way because of it. They pander to the clueless masses, not to security or IT people. Bothers me, a lot.
It's enough for me to really feel uncomfortable ever recommending KnowBe4.... if this is how they view themselves, why would I take them any differently?
He's their "Chief Hacking Officer" now. WTF does that mean?
