ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Solved CentOS 7 enabling Telnet

    IT Discussion
    telnet centos firewalld troubleshooting ydmp yealink device management
    3
    15
    3.9k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DustinB3403D
      DustinB3403 @iroal
      last edited by

      @iroal said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

      Try to disable SELinux with the command "setenforce 0"

      That doesn't correct the issue either.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • dbeatoD
        dbeato @DustinB3403
        last edited by

        @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

        I just figured it out, it's using the default port. 23 rather than the port I thought I added correctly.

        What if you create an IPTable forwarding from that 9090 port to the internal port 23? Does that work?

        DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DustinB3403D
          DustinB3403 @dbeato
          last edited by

          @dbeato said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

          @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

          I just figured it out, it's using the default port. 23 rather than the port I thought I added correctly.

          What if you create an IPTable forwarding from that 9090 port to the internal port 23? Does that work?

          How would I do that?

          dbeatoD 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • dbeatoD
            dbeato @DustinB3403
            last edited by

            @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

            @dbeato said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

            @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

            I just figured it out, it's using the default port. 23 rather than the port I thought I added correctly.

            What if you create an IPTable forwarding from that 9090 port to the internal port 23? Does that work?

            How would I do that?

            Actually, something along this lines might be good:
            http://sharadchhetri.com/2014/12/08/change-telnet-server-port-number-centos-7-rhel-7/

            DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • DustinB3403D
              DustinB3403 @dbeato
              last edited by DustinB3403

              @dbeato I'm already reading it, but systemd fails to restart the service with

               systemctl status telnet.socket
ā— telnet.socket - Telnet Server Activation Socket
   Loaded: loaded (/usr/lib/systemd/system/telnet.socket; enabled; vendor preset: disabled)
   Active: failed (Result: resources) since Thu 2018-06-07 08:35:37 EDT; 14min ago
	 Docs: man:telnetd(8)
   Listen: [::]:9090 (Stream)
 Accepted: 1; Connected: 0

Jun 07 08:37:31 server systemd[1]: Starting Telnet Server Activation Socket.
Jun 07 08:37:51 server systemd[1]: telnet.socket failed to listen on sockets: Permission denied
Jun 07 08:37:51 server systemd[1]: Failed to listen on Telnet Server Activation Socket.
Jun 07 08:37:51 server systemd[1]: Starting Telnet Server Activation Socket.
Jun 07 08:40:15 server systemd[1]: telnet.socket failed to listen on sockets: Permission denied
Jun 07 08:40:15 server systemd[1]: Failed to listen on Telnet Server Activation Socket.
Jun 07 08:40:15 server systemd[1]: Starting Telnet Server Activation Socket.
Jun 07 08:49:31 server systemd[1]: telnet.socket failed to listen on sockets: Permission denied
Jun 07 08:49:31 server systemd[1]: Failed to listen on Telnet Server Activation Socket.
Jun 07 08:49:31 server systemd[1]: Starting Telnet Server Activation Socket.
              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • dbeatoD
                dbeato @DustinB3403
                last edited by

                @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                @dbeato said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                I just figured it out, it's using the default port. 23 rather than the port I thought I added correctly.

                What if you create an IPTable forwarding from that 9090 port to the internal port 23? Does that work?

                How would I do that?

                For the firewall rules this is what I would use:

                firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=9009/tcp --permanent
firewall-cmd --reload
semanage port -a -t telnetd_port_t -p tcp 9099

                Also are you modifying the following file?
                /usr/lib/systemd/system/telnet.socket

                DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • DustinB3403D
                  DustinB3403
                  last edited by DustinB3403

                  and the journalctl logs has

                  -- Unit telnet.socket has begun starting up.
Jun 07 08:50:48 server polkitd[713]: Unregistered Authentication Agent for unix-process:3613:205717 (system bus name :1.48, object path /org/freedesktop/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.
Jun 07 08:57:21 server firewalld[743]: WARNING: ALREADY_ENABLED: 9090:tcp
Jun 07 08:58:16 server polkitd[713]: Registered Authentication Agent for unix-process:3803:250497 (system bus name :1.53 [/usr/bin/pkttyagent --notify-fd 5 --fallback], object path /org/freedesktop/
Jun 07 08:58:16 server polkitd[713]: Unregistered Authentication Agent for unix-process:3803:250497 (system bus name :1.53, object path /org/freedesktop/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.
Jun 07 08:59:03 server polkitd[713]: Registered Authentication Agent for unix-process:3820:255214 (system bus name :1.54 [/usr/bin/pkttyagent --notify-fd 5 --fallback], object path /org/freedesktop/
Jun 07 08:59:03 server systemd[1]: Reloading.
Jun 07 08:59:04 server polkitd[713]: Unregistered Authentication Agent for unix-process:3820:255214 (system bus name :1.54, object path /org/freedesktop/PolicyKit1/AuthenticationAgent, locale en_US.
Jun 07 08:59:11 server polkitd[713]: Registered Authentication Agent for unix-process:3840:255990 (system bus name :1.55 [/usr/bin/pkttyagent --notify-fd 5 --fallback], object path /org/freedesktop/
Jun 07 08:59:11 server systemd[1]: telnet.socket failed to listen on sockets: Permission denied
Jun 07 08:59:11 server systemd[1]: Failed to listen on Telnet Server Activation Socket.
                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DustinB3403D
                    DustinB3403 @dbeato
                    last edited by

                    @dbeato said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                    @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                    @dbeato said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                    @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                    I just figured it out, it's using the default port. 23 rather than the port I thought I added correctly.

                    What if you create an IPTable forwarding from that 9090 port to the internal port 23? Does that work?

                    How would I do that?

                    For the firewall rules this is what I would use:

                    firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=9009/tcp --permanent
firewall-cmd --reload
semanage port -a -t telnetd_port_t -p tcp 9099

                    Also are you modifying the following file?
                    /usr/lib/systemd/system/telnet.socket

                    Yes I've done all of this.

                    dbeatoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • dbeatoD
                      dbeato @DustinB3403
                      last edited by

                      @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                      @dbeato said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                      @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                      @dbeato said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                      @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                      I just figured it out, it's using the default port. 23 rather than the port I thought I added correctly.

                      What if you create an IPTable forwarding from that 9090 port to the internal port 23? Does that work?

                      How would I do that?

                      For the firewall rules this is what I would use:

                      firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-port=9009/tcp --permanent
firewall-cmd --reload
semanage port -a -t telnetd_port_t -p tcp 9099

                      Also are you modifying the following file?
                      /usr/lib/systemd/system/telnet.socket

                      Yes I've done all of this.

                      Interesting, I am not sure then.

                      DustinB3403D 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • DustinB3403D
                        DustinB3403 @dbeato
                        last edited by

                        @dbeato I've even modified the predefined service at /usr/lib/firewalld/services/telnet.xml to use port 9090 and the service still fails to load.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • DustinB3403D
                          DustinB3403
                          last edited by

                          And I got the port forwarding to work.

                          firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-forward-port=port=9090:proto=tcp:toport=23

                          I can now telnet to my server on port 9090 (which forward to 23).

                          dbeatoD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                          • dbeatoD
                            dbeato @DustinB3403
                            last edited by

                            @dustinb3403 said in CentOS 7 enabling Telnet:

                            And I got the port forwarding to work.

                            firewall-cmd --zone=public --add-forward-port=port=9090:proto=tcp:toport=23

                            I can now telnet to my server on port 9090 (which forward to 23).

                            Nice!

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1 / 1
                            • First post
                              Last post