XOSAN with XO Community edition
-
Re: Xen Orchestra - Community Edition - Installing with Yarn
Hi - anyone tried XOSAN with XO Community edition? I use a Adaptec raid controller and I keep having issues with it.
-
Please post your output into a code block, and also post the GH link of this functionality being open-sourced and available for use with XO Community edition.
-
Added tags.
-
I'd love to know how or where you have enabled this functionality as the github repo's weren't available. Did you install using https://github.com/Jarli01/xenorchestra_installer or did you install with some other method?
-
https://github.com/vatesfr/glusterfs-driver
Probably this.
-
So I just upgraded to xo-web 5.16.1 and it looks like it may be an option.
I'd need to find the cloud plugin though. . .
-
But this functionality we had available some time ago, it was access to the "plugin" that was the issue.
Paging @Danp do you remember why we left off on this. It was so long ago I don't recall. Besides just not having access to the GH repo to look at and test this.
-
@dustinb3403 said in XOSAN with XO Community edition:
So I just upgraded to xo-web 5.16.1 and it looks like it may be an option.
I've been thinking about this and I wonder if our upgrade process needs to be revises. Since everything is now being committed to the master branch, you actually upgraded to 5.16.1 plus all other commits that have occurred since that time.
-
@dustinb3403 said in XOSAN with XO Community edition:
But this functionality we had available some time ago, it was access to the "plugin" that was the issue.
Paging @Danp do you remember why we left off on this. It was so long ago I don't recall. Besides just not having access to the GH repo to look at and test this.
Sorry, but my memory is fuzzy on that issue.
-
-
@dustinb3403 Could be, but isn't there also a separate VM that gets deployed to each XS, etc?
-
@danp said in XOSAN with XO Community edition:
@dustinb3403 Could be, but isn't there also a separate VM that gets deployed to each XS, etc?
Yea it has to be created, I was reading what I could find on GH a short while ago but it looks as though some of the documentation is out of date / missing
-
@danp said in XOSAN with XO Community edition:
@dustinb3403 said in XOSAN with XO Community edition:
So I just upgraded to xo-web 5.16.1 and it looks like it may be an option.
I've been thinking about this and I wonder if our upgrade process needs to be revises. Since everything is now being committed to the master branch, you actually upgraded to 5.16.1 plus all other commits that have occurred since that time.
@olivier Care to comment on this?
-
You could try using StarWind VSAN Free instead XOSAN for hyperconvergence. Even though they say they do not officially support Xen hyperconverged, it should be technically possible, I believe.
-
@darek-hamann said in XOSAN with XO Community edition:
You could try using StarWind VSAN Free instead XOSAN for hyperconvergence. Even though they say they do not officially support Xen hyperconverged, it should be technically possible, I believe.
I'd have to double check on that, I thought I read that every hypervisor is supported as vSAN will run on the VM level rather than at the Hyper-V level if the host isn't running Hyper-V.
-
@danp What do you mean? I don't understand.
-
@olivier said in XOSAN with XO Community edition:
What do you mean? I don't understand.
My interpretation of his question was whether we need to change the way we do updates because right now the update script only checks for a change in version number, when there are actually other changes committed between version numbers?
-
@olivier when I issue the command
git clone -b master https://github.com/vatesfr/xen-orchestra
orgit pull --ff-only
, isn't that going to pull down the absolute latest source from the repo, including any commits that have occurred since the last "release"?For example, XO 5.16 was released on 2/1 and there have been over 3800 commits since that time. How would I build a new VM with
xo-server 5.16.0
andxo-web 5.16.1
that doesn't include the subsequent commits? Ditto for updating an existing VM. -
@danp This is just because we merged in the mono repo. I don't think there is any issue to pull everything on master.
-
@olivier Technically, it's because you no longer use the concept of a
next-release
branch. :grinning_face_with_smiling_eyes:It just means that everyone could be running a slightly different version unless you are running XOA.