Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin
-
Greed means "intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food."
Greed only means desire, not action. Doing something illegal almost always means that they can't be greedy because, most of the time, illegal actions end up making you lose in the long run, not win.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
Greed means "intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food."
Greed only means desire, not action. Doing something illegal almost always means that they can't be greedy because, most of the time, illegal actions end up making you lose in the long run, not win.
OK fine - I'll accept that- so where does greed run into issues?
Oh.. you're saying it doesn't run into issues - it's what incorporated businesses want.
-
Back to @Emad-R post about unfair advantage and greed mining..
Still don't know what he means?
These crypto mining seems to be the most fair thing you can do - assuming you have net neutrality.
i.e. if you have the funds, you can build at many miners as you can afford.
If as Scott said:
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
But it makes mining take WAY more electricity and time.
The rich will still be able to afford WAY more electricity and the poor, even better, the rich can afford to be mobile and do their work where power is cheaper, where the poor often can't move to that area.
-
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
Back to @Emad-R post about unfair advantage and greed mining..
Still don't know what he means?
These crypto mining seems to be the most fair thing you can do - assuming you have net neutrality.
i.e. if you have the funds, you can build at many miners as you can afford.
If as Scott said:
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
But it makes mining take WAY more electricity and time.
The rich will still be able to afford WAY more electricity and the poor, even better, the rich can afford to be mobile and do their work where power is cheaper, where the poor often can't move to that area.
It seems CPU reached a limit regarding Parallel processing. especially x86 arch. which creates the equal playing field.
-
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
Greed means "intense and selfish desire for something, especially wealth, power, or food."
Greed only means desire, not action. Doing something illegal almost always means that they can't be greedy because, most of the time, illegal actions end up making you lose in the long run, not win.
OK fine - I'll accept that- so where does greed run into issues?
Oh.. you're saying it doesn't run into issues - it's what incorporated businesses want.
Real greed doesn't really run into issues.
-
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
Back to @Emad-R post about unfair advantage and greed mining..
Still don't know what he means?
These crypto mining seems to be the most fair thing you can do - assuming you have net neutrality.
i.e. if you have the funds, you can build at many miners as you can afford.
Same with other types of mining. This doesn't make it more fair. It just artificially changes the system to make it less efficient.
-
@emad-r said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
It seems CPU reached a limit regarding Parallel processing. especially x86 arch. which creates the equal playing field.
In what way does that equal the playing field? I see nothing of the sort. It just takes a naturally uneven playing field and makes it equally, or more, uneven but in a pointless and artificial way.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@emad-r said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
It seems CPU reached a limit regarding Parallel processing. especially x86 arch. which creates the equal playing field.
In what way does that equal the playing field? I see nothing of the sort. It just takes a naturally uneven playing field and makes it equally, or more, uneven but in a pointless and artificial way.
how do you see the playing field as uneven? Unless you're talking about how power is more expensive in some places vs others.
-
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@emad-r said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
It seems CPU reached a limit regarding Parallel processing. especially x86 arch. which creates the equal playing field.
In what way does that equal the playing field? I see nothing of the sort. It just takes a naturally uneven playing field and makes it equally, or more, uneven but in a pointless and artificial way.
how do you see the playing field as uneven? Unless you're talking about how power is more expensive in some places vs others.
How was it ever uneven? The field is uneven always in the same way - the rich can afford more and faster processors, more electric, etc. Whether that power comes in the form of CPUs, GPUs, ASICs, etc. doesn't really matter. The field was always uneven to give the rich more ability to mine, and it remains just as uneven. Making it just way more expensive, if anything, would help the rich more than the poor because the overall value of the mining is less so only larger scale would have any real purpose.
-
It seems a bizarre assumption that the use of CPUs is somehow "fair and even" and using GPUs is "unfair." How could technology work that way? If we step back, it's really double precision processors are fair and single precision processors are unfair. Sounds pretty bizarre when put in math terms, right?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
It seems a bizarre assumption that the use of CPUs is somehow "fair and even" and using GPUs is "unfair." How could technology work that way? If we step back, it's really double precision processors are fair and single precision processors are unfair. Sounds pretty bizarre when put in math terms, right?
This was my whole point.
-
This is all likely to change if the lightning network gets going. I'm not well versed enough to try to explain it, in a clear concise text post, but it is a add on that will allow for near instant transfers and the ability to keep sort of a tab open for micro transactions to take place, then close out after services. Google it if you are interested in how it works under the hood.
-
@s-hackleman said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
This is all likely to change if the lightning network gets going. I'm not well versed enough to try to explain it, in a clear concise text post, but it is a add on that will allow for near instant transfers and the ability to keep sort of a tab open for micro transactions to take place, then close out after services. Google it if you are interested in how it works under the hood.
Raiblocks does much of that already today.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@s-hackleman said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
This is all likely to change if the lightning network gets going. I'm not well versed enough to try to explain it, in a clear concise text post, but it is a add on that will allow for near instant transfers and the ability to keep sort of a tab open for micro transactions to take place, then close out after services. Google it if you are interested in how it works under the hood.
Raiblocks does much of that already today.
I know others do, but having this functionality on the most popular coin on in the world could be a game changer. Right now using bitcoin to do anything other than hold long term wealth is close to useless.
-
I'm just amazed that Paypal hasn't made paying easier. It's not crypto currency, but the option to make much more secure transactions using your phone to pay via Paypal seems obvious.
Some locations (Home Depot) allow payment via Paypal.
I wonder if it's people not wanting it or businesses not wanting it?
-
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
I'm just amazed that Paypal hasn't made paying easier. It's not crypto currency, but the option to make much more secure transactions using your phone to pay via Paypal seems obvious.
Some locations (Home Depot) allow payment via Paypal.
I wonder if it's people not wanting it or businesses not wanting it?
Businesses don't want it, the fees are too high.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
I'm just amazed that Paypal hasn't made paying easier. It's not crypto currency, but the option to make much more secure transactions using your phone to pay via Paypal seems obvious.
Some locations (Home Depot) allow payment via Paypal.
I wonder if it's people not wanting it or businesses not wanting it?
Businesses don't want it, the fees are too high.
Then I guess that means that PP doesn't want it either - CC's fees used to be to high for fastfood use, but that changed.
-
@s-hackleman said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@s-hackleman said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
This is all likely to change if the lightning network gets going. I'm not well versed enough to try to explain it, in a clear concise text post, but it is a add on that will allow for near instant transfers and the ability to keep sort of a tab open for micro transactions to take place, then close out after services. Google it if you are interested in how it works under the hood.
Raiblocks does much of that already today.
I know others do, but having this functionality on the most popular coin on in the world could be a game changer. Right now using bitcoin to do anything other than hold long term wealth is close to useless.
I dont believe in bitcoin itself long term. I think there is still money to be made on it, but who knows in 5 years.
-
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@dashrender said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
I'm just amazed that Paypal hasn't made paying easier. It's not crypto currency, but the option to make much more secure transactions using your phone to pay via Paypal seems obvious.
Some locations (Home Depot) allow payment via Paypal.
I wonder if it's people not wanting it or businesses not wanting it?
Businesses don't want it, the fees are too high.
Then I guess that means that PP doesn't want it either - CC's fees used to be to high for fastfood use, but that changed.
That PP doesn't want what?
-
@irj said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@s-hackleman said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@scottalanmiller said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
@s-hackleman said in Starbucks says it will accept crypto currency, but not bitcoin:
This is all likely to change if the lightning network gets going. I'm not well versed enough to try to explain it, in a clear concise text post, but it is a add on that will allow for near instant transfers and the ability to keep sort of a tab open for micro transactions to take place, then close out after services. Google it if you are interested in how it works under the hood.
Raiblocks does much of that already today.
I know others do, but having this functionality on the most popular coin on in the world could be a game changer. Right now using bitcoin to do anything other than hold long term wealth is close to useless.
I dont believe in bitcoin itself long term. I think there is still money to be made on it, but who knows in 5 years.
I don't believe in any cryptocurrency. I doubt it will ever be as stable as general regular currency (not that the USD is stable, but relatively speaking it is), on top of the conversion and transaction fees... I can't see it becoming mainstream if ever.
