UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue
-
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
Those clients have a gateway of 10.10.3.1 or 10.10.4.1.
-
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
Those clients have a gateway of 10.10.3.1 or 10.10.4.1.
Exactly - to fix those clients, you need to change their gateway to whatever you want the single gateway IP to be. Then you could get rid of those extra IPs on the ER interface.
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, ...
I might have missed this, but why do you have multiple networks on a single LAN?
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
Set up in what way on the Windows Server? Why does Windows Server need configuration for subnets it is not on?
What's the purpose of the different subnets?
-
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
He only actually has two subnets.
10.10.0.0/22 and 10.10.4.0/24 -
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
He only actually has two subnets.
10.10.0.0/22 and 10.10.4.0/24Then that still is not good.
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
Ok guys I'm utterly confused. So when I go back to the Edge Router, add the 10.10.3.1 and 10.10.4.1 to the interface for my lan, now the clients that were not able to get online are online again, no biggie. I'm still trying to wrap my head around how this is supposed to be properly set up.
I am under the impression, all subnets should only be set up on the windows server directly, not on the router.
So the Router options need to be change on each scope to have the correct gateway. You shouldn't need to have multiple gateways for each subnet. Do you have the guest subnet VLANs accessible from the Server?
He only actually has two subnets.
10.10.0.0/22 and 10.10.4.0/24Then that still is not good.
Exactly, and he's shown that he has many DHCP scopes scooped up into a SuperScope. all of that needs to be deleted and a new single zone for the 10.10.0.0/22 needs to be created.
-
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
No he isn't. He has a large subnet and a small subnet.
The large subnet has multiple gateways assigned on various computers for unknown reasons, but it is just 1 large subnet.
-
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
I didn't do the math.. I was assuming 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.4.0 when in /22 overlaped, but they don't.
-
@dashrender said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
I didn't do the math.. I was assuming 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.4.0 when in /22 overlaped, but they don't.
I posted pictures of it earlier, no need for maths..
https://i.imgur.com/QzDJIga.png -
Looking back at the config in the first post - it appears that whoever set this up felt that they needed more than /22 on the single network, so they tossed on the 10.10.4.0/24 to give 256 more addresses to that space - why they didn't just go to 10.10.0.0/21 I don't understand.
-
Deleted.
-
@dashrender Because that would take it to 10.10.7.255
-
@dashrender said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dashrender said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
I didn't do the math.. I was assuming 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.4.0 when in /22 overlaped, but they don't.
I posted pictures of it earlier, no need for maths..
https://i.imgur.com/QzDJIga.pngSure you did, but it doesn't actually show you the full size of the network... i.e. 10.10.0.0-10.0.3.254
...............
look at the picture again....
-
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dashrender said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dashrender said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
I didn't do the math.. I was assuming 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.4.0 when in /22 overlaped, but they don't.
I posted pictures of it earlier, no need for maths..
https://i.imgur.com/QzDJIga.pngSure you did, but it doesn't actually show you the full size of the network... i.e. 10.10.0.0-10.0.3.254
...............
look at the picture again....
yeah, I just noticed that last line.
-
@jaredbusch said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dashrender said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@dbeato said in UBNT EdgeRouter LAN Config Issue:
@krisleslie You need to reconfigure this network right now because you are overlapping networks which are included in the first network.
I didn't do the math.. I was assuming 10.10.0.0 and 10.10.4.0 when in /22 overlaped, but they don't.
I posted pictures of it earlier, no need for maths..
https://i.imgur.com/QzDJIga.pngThat makes more sense. So is just bad DHCP configuration.
-
Ok so this makes a lot more sense. Heads up guys im not the network specialist so its really outside of my thought processes. Thats a weak point of mine and I am studying to get the network +.
With that said, so I can make sure I understand is first the router was incorrectly setup on that one interface. To fix that, I will need to remove the other gateways and ultimately have just 10.10.0.1/21 instead of 10.10.2.1/22. If i were to remove it during business hours, some wireless devices eventually didnt have a gateway and thus no connection to the internet. But removing them will cleanse that problem after clean up the Windows Server DHCP service.
So to fix the DHCP server, we need to remove each scope and super-scope and recreate only one scope as 10.10.0.0/21 which negates whatever way this was setup originally. The static ips we had assigned should still work and I just need to make sure we are excluding them from the scope.
Lastly reboot and pray and possibly with adult bevarages.