Miscellaneous Tech News
-
-
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
-
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
Nothing but a rewording of the original title. "DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”"
No opinion added, no opinion exists in this case. Just a straight forward description without directly copying the wording.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
Nothing but a rewording of the original title. "DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”"
No opinion added, no opinion exists in this case. Just a straight forward description without directly copying the wording.
That’s just one part of the article, it has another part of why they do it or how they defended it.
-
-
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
Nothing but a rewording of the original title. "DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”"
No opinion added, no opinion exists in this case. Just a straight forward description without directly copying the wording.
That’s just one part of the article, it has another part of why they do it or how they defended it.
that's fine but doesn't change the fact that no opinion was added and it was just repeating the headline.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
Nothing but a rewording of the original title. "DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”"
No opinion added, no opinion exists in this case. Just a straight forward description without directly copying the wording.
Rewording means you arrange the words in a pattern that you desired. This turned it into your opinion.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
Nothing but a rewording of the original title. "DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”"
No opinion added, no opinion exists in this case. Just a straight forward description without directly copying the wording.
That’s just one part of the article, it has another part of why they do it or how they defended it.
that's fine but doesn't change the fact that no opinion was added and it was just repeating the headline.
Yes it does. Because it is not the headline of the article, it is your opinion of the article.
-
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
Nothing but a rewording of the original title. "DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”"
No opinion added, no opinion exists in this case. Just a straight forward description without directly copying the wording.
That’s just one part of the article, it has another part of why they do it or how they defended it.
that's fine but doesn't change the fact that no opinion was added and it was just repeating the headline.
Yes it does. Because it is not the headline of the article, it is your opinion of the article.
Not at all. There was no opinion. It was literally just me rewording the headline, it's that simple. Nothing more to it.
-
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@scottalanmiller said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@jaredbusch said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@mlnews said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Again with injecting your own bias on a headline.
Stop doing it or stop reporting it as “news” and call it click bait.
Nothing but a rewording of the original title. "DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”"
No opinion added, no opinion exists in this case. Just a straight forward description without directly copying the wording.
Rewording means you arrange the words in a pattern that you desired.
Which is exactly what it is. Read the original title, read the rewording. Identical meanings. Zero opinion, no variance.
-
Original: DHS defends media-monitoring database, calls critics “conspiracy theorists”
Rewording: DHS calls those that are critical of their media-monitoring databases conspiracy theorists.
Please explain where any opinion was added. Both cases use the subjective party of the DHS, both have the verb of labelling critics conspiracy theorists, both about critics of the media-monitoring database. As there is no variance, whatsoever, from the original, how is it even possible for opinion to be involved here? And what opinion do you even think that is as I can't even tell. I had to go back and check which was the original and which was the rewording, because I wasn't sure which was which.
-
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2018/04/new-look-flathub-website
That's needed, the old site was rough to use.
-
-
-
-
-
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/AMP/2018/04/09/ftc_youtube_complaint
Is it so wrong to blame parenting?
-
@black3dynamite said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
@dbeato said in Miscellaneous Tech News:
https://www.theregister.co.uk/AMP/2018/04/09/ftc_youtube_complaint
Is it so wrong to blame parenting?
Oh, no it is not wrong.
-
Microsoft breaks InTune Company Portal for potentially millions of users.
If your toggle has been set to ‘not compliant’ and you use compliance policies with CA, devices without at least one compliance policy assigned to them will now be blocked by CA. End users associated with these devices, who were previously allowed access to company resources, will lose their access unless you assign at least one compliance policy to all users.
Which a lot of organizations don't actually apply a policy, but only require the user to enroll with the device.
Yay Microsoft. . .
