Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students
-
@worden2 said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
@scottalanmiller said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
Ok yeah that was weird. If it works for them then fine. So tech without any business purpose I suppose is what you mean.
Exactly. Tech for the purpose of tech, stuff that isn't legal or viable or reasonable in a business. In this case, weird VDI problems that are never mentioned, no talk of cost or applicability (even at the home gaming level), use of totally ridiculous amateur tools when enterprise tools would do a better job for free, etc. That show is a bench show, for good reason as bench is a far bigger market than IT. Every home user likes cool bench stuff, only good businesses enjoy IT stuff.
In their defense the tagline for the guys doing the video is "because we can". They're certainly living up to that...
Yes, and while I think their show is beyond goofy, I get that. I find zero interest in non-IT tech. I'm one of those people that is rare but came to IT because I love business and enjoy tech, tech is a means to the business. It's far more common to be a bench person, love tech and put up with the business to get to play with the biggest tech. To me, tech without business purpose is super boring. There are so many things that I can do "because I can" but... why? The outcome is so boring. Like everything on that show. Of course you can do that, I had machines with 300 users like that decades ago... and it was boring then.
It's worth pointing out that "because we can" should really be the tagline for all of bench. That's the thing about bench, it's pure tech without the business piece. So they are really bench in so many ways.
-
@scottalanmiller I understand that point but at the same time IT needs bench just as much as bench needs IT(going by your definition of IT). A lot of the people you call IT don't have the skill to do bench work. So they make decisions on what to buy for users but don't know why it may be good or bad. Often it is bad. So then all those scanners, printers, and other devices they can't actually deploy without their bench people.
So after thinking about this further I just don't think you should separate the different roles the way you are. IT and bench people both depend on the other. This mostly explains why bench people are so opinionated about management in a bad way as IT orders stuff so often that just does not make sense on a technical level. They are two sides of the same coin. I do not think differentiating between IT and bench is even helpful. That just creates a divide between the two groups that does not need to be there.
-
@scottalanmiller I know for my first MS degree what interested me was the program was the best combo of IT and business I'd ever seen. Since then I've gotten into education as my "business", but I'll never lose sight of the purpose in it all.
-
@jmoore I'll give you an example from current events at my College. We just started an optometric technology degree. We "inherited" it from the University down the road. They had and still have an optometry/ophthalmology degree, but saw no need to maintain the tech side of things. We do AASs anyway so we took it over. An ophthalmologist or optometrist does not grind or shape lenses or do fittings, etc. A technologist does not have the ability or authority to do prescriptions. Each depends on the other, and you might want to say the person with the medical degree might be "above" the person with the technology side, but in fact when you balance the time and money they put into their respective careers, the trade-off is negligible. The Doctor cannot make money with out the technologist, and the technologist has no job without the Doctor. It's a symbiotic relationship even if there is an element of hierarchy involved.
-
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
@scottalanmiller I understand that point but at the same time IT needs bench just as much as bench needs IT(going by your definition of IT). A lot of the people you call IT don't have the skill to do bench work. So they make decisions on what to buy for users but don't know why it may be good or bad. Often it is bad. So then all those scanners, printers, and other devices they can't actually deploy without their bench people.
Again, though, I think you are stuck on IT people who just do a bad job and then associate that in some way with bench skills. There is no connection there. Bad IT people making bad IT decisions is 100% an IT problem, it has no relationship to bench. IT needs bench to plug things in for them, regardless of if IT makes good or bad decisions. They have different roles and both need to exist. But their skills are different and one can never make up for the other.
-
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
So after thinking about this further I just don't think you should separate the different roles the way you are. IT and bench people both depend on the other. This mostly explains why bench people are so opinionated about management in a bad way as IT orders stuff so often that just does not make sense on a technical level. They are two sides of the same coin. I do not think differentiating between IT and bench is even helpful. That just creates a divide between the two groups that does not need to be there.
All roles in a business are codependent, but you never mix HR and IT, or accounting and bench together just because they depend on each other. You keep them carefully separated and know exactly when a job is IT and when it is finance because you need different security, different training, different aptitudes, different unions or legal responsibilities, and you get people who want to do different things.
There is no case where it would ever be useful to see them as one thing. If it appears so, then the roles are being misunderstood. Any mixing of the two would be bad because it means a misconception of what is being accomplished.
It's a divide that is there, whether we want it or not, but it is a divide that is really important. It's different tasks. It's not me that divides it, no person can decide that. It's two different things.
-
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
They are two sides of the same coin.
No, they are different coins completely. You are missing that they are unrelated roles. That they both use computers is very little different than how all jobs in a modern company use computers. Bench and IT don't overlap.
-
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
This mostly explains why bench people are so opinionated about management in a bad way as IT orders stuff so often that just does not make sense on a technical level.
You are back to thinking of IT and bench as one being high level and the other being low level of the same thing. Any feeling that anything like this exists means you've not yet understood what I'm describing. The two are totally unique and separate. In no way does your example of IT making bad purchases result in what you are describing. By definition, bench cannot "fix" anything IT has done wrong, only IT can fix it. If it seems like they can, you are calling IT people bench and have mixed their roles together. Bench and IT do not overlap in this (or any) way.
You may have a lot of experiences where IT management and IT trenches don't get along. But the bench is not a reference to IT trench workers or any aspect of IT. They are different jobs.
-
-
@scottalanmiller I agree that their skills are different from one another. There is no doubt of that. Maybe my IT people are bad but they also seem pretty common from what I have seen. Does that mean that most IT people are bad? Seems like a far stretch but who knows. I certainly wouldn't want to say that. I guess one of the main issues I have with that is the decision making progress. You mentioned before that IT people are able to look things up and make correct decisions because has not really changed in a few decades. If they never learned about tech in the first place then it does not matter as they doi not have any foundation to make good decisions correct?
-
Remember that bench does not manage computers. So if IT orders computers that don't meet the user's needs, bench has no capability to fix that since bench does not manage the computers. This would be like saying that the wrong software was bought, so the electrician has to fix it.
How would the electrician / electrical department have the access, rights, knowledge or responsibility to fix software issues?
-
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
@scottalanmiller I agree that their skills are different from one another. There is no doubt of that. Maybe my IT people are bad but they also seem pretty common from what I have seen. Does that mean that most IT people are bad? Seems like a far stretch but who knows. I certainly wouldn't want to say that. I guess one of the main issues I have with that is the decision making progress. You mentioned before that IT people are able to look things up and make correct decisions because has not really changed in a few decades. If they never learned about tech in the first place then it does not matter as they doi not have any foundation to make good decisions correct?
Sure, but what does that have to do with the discussion? Remember, we've established that bench knowledge is not IT knowledge and no amount of knowing bench would provide the needed knowledge for IT. Your question is leading and sounds like you are going back to talking about bench as being "entry level IT" rather than a separate discipline with different knowledge.
No one is disputing that incompetent IT people make incompetent decisions - but that is neither here for there with the discussion about bench. Should university teach basic computer literacy, though? No, they should simply demand it before they accept students.
-
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
Maybe my IT people are bad but they also seem pretty common from what I have seen.
Most bench people are bad. Most IT are bad. Most managers drive companies into the ground. The average of any field is really bad. That's a given. If you go from the expectation that "normal is good" you'll struggle to understand how any field works. But when you realize that the median in any field is pretty poor and that even caring or trying to do a good job is less than the 50% mark, things make a lot more sense.
You've suggested several times that the IT you deal with is pretty poor, especially up the chain. I'm sure that that is true. But what you describe is absolutely common. Go on Spiceworks and look at the average discussion, it's horrendous. People asking the same "textbook mistakes" questions every day, day after day, and never using common sense, common knowledge, looking up what others have done or looking at popular threads of the day or week. The average isn't just bad, it's a train wreck.
But look at the average bench tech. The average is a Geek Squad worker. They earn $12/hr, get no respect and most don't have the first clue about any kind of technology modern or otherwise. Sure, they might know the brand names of the coolest water cooler or fastest GPU but that's about where their knowledge ends. Need to know about RAID, hot swap, UREs, SSD survival rates and they don't even know the terms. Nor do they need to. But go to a big box store and talk to their bench guys sometime, the average is really, really bad. Their knowledge isn't even useful for where they are, let alone to be taken and used in IT somewhere.
-
-
Remember that in the business world, 85% of new businesses fail in the first five years. Over 50% in the first year - which means that they started a business without thinking through how to even get it to the point of maybe starting. The failure rate of normal business thinking is very high. IT is a business endeavour. IT has to do business, but in a vastly more technical way, without the benefit of getting to be openly honest about the challenges of IT nor that they are actually a business function. IT has one of the hardest jobs out there, in all seriousness it's an intense field. That the failure rates are astronomic is to be expected.
-
@scottalanmiller Ok interesting video. I guess I did not realize that the average bench and It person were so bad. I do have a story about that though which confirms what you said. A few years ago I went to an Altex store and asked their management person what I would need to do to use SAS drives just because I wanted to learn the technology of them and building a good server. He had never heard of that term and said it did not exist as there was only regular and ssd drives. So I'm just proving your point. I would not, a good lawyer, make.
-
@scottalanmiller So IT is making business decisions and solving problems for users on a logical level and
bench is just working with the hardware? -
Yeah, retail bench manager is likely pretty far removed from enterprise bench and/or IT needs. Knowing what SAS is is pretty casual tech knowledge, but Altex is just a store and not a technical one really. At least from the time that I've spent there, they are very physical in nature (racks, cables, trays, etc.)
What's odd is that in general bench tends to be way less technical than IT, even though bench is all tech and IT is only tech on the side. Good bench is really good, but even being purely tech there is surprising little tech that actually happens on the bench side.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
Remember that in the business world, 85% of new businesses fail in the first five years. Over 50% in the first year - which means that they started a business without thinking through how to even get it to the point of maybe starting. The failure rate of normal business thinking is very high. IT is a business endeavour. IT has to do business, but in a vastly more technical way, without the benefit of getting to be openly honest about the challenges of IT nor that they are actually a business function. IT has one of the hardest jobs out there, in all seriousness it's an intense field. That the failure rates are astronomic is to be expected.
Guess I need to go watch your entering IT video. Just realized I had missed it. I want to get to the point where I make business decisions so I need to figure out the best path for that.
-
@jmoore said in Where Does University Need to Focus for IT Students:
@scottalanmiller So IT is making business decisions and solving problems for users on a logical level and
bench is just working with the hardware?Right. The only normal bench interactions with users come from working in retail or needing to ask users to move out of their cubicle while the bench guys work on the hardware.
Let's take a VERY end user interfacing process and see how it breaks down between the two...
- User has a need that requires a GPU.
- Helpdesk takes a ticket that something for graphics processing is needed <- IT task
- Desktop team looks at ticket and determines the GPU needed <- IT task
- IT Procurement acquires the GPU requested <- IT task
- Part arrives and is delivered to the user's desk <- facilities / mail room task
- Bench tech is deployed to the desk to open the case, install the GPU and ensure that the computer turns back on and that the helpdesk can reach it remotely <- bench task
- GPU is configured, drivers install, applications configured to leverage it <- IT task
- Helpdesk circles back with the end users to make sure that things work as they should and closes ticket. <- It task.
