Microsoft SQL Backup Solution
-
Unitrends and Veeam are often the go to solutions when discussing backup. You're already considering Unitrends, all that needs to be sorted out is the retention.
Have you bought Unitrends, do you have support?
-
@dustinb3403 said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
you bought Unitrends, do you have suppo
Unitrends Evaluation
-
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
Unitrends Evaluation
So the only support option would be their support channel / chat.
It can be found here under chat. Enter a description of the problem, and see if the issue exists, if not move to the chat and see if anyone is online who can assist.
I haven't used unitrends, so I can't speak to the issue you're having.
-
@dustinb3403 said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
Unitrends Evaluation
So the only support option would be their support channel / chat.
It can be found here under chat. Enter a description of the problem, and see if the issue exists, if not move to the chat and see if anyone is online who can assist.
I haven't used unitrends, so I can't speak to the issue you're having.
Boy, to get a real worth while understanding of a product, I would expect them to give more support during an evaluation period. Perhaps you can call them and they will give you a support incident to call in on.
-
You'll want to be looking at Veeam.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
You'll want to be looking at Veeam.
Since we know you have the infrastructure for Rapid Recovery, Veeam is probably the least expensive option. Assuming they support CSV, which I have no clue.
-
-
@scottalanmiller We are using Physical SQL Cluster with CSV.
-
I would like to have a Backup solution of SQL with native agent base backup rather than Block level backup, so that I can restore in DB level.
-
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
I would like to have a Backup solution of SQL with native agent base backup rather than Block level backup, so that I can restore in DB level.
Are you saying that because you think that Veeam does not have an agent?
-
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
@scottalanmiller We are using Physical SQL Cluster with CSV.
Isnt' this in production? Databases are the last thing you'd want physical.
-
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
I would like to have a Backup solution of SQL with native agent base backup rather than Block level backup, so that I can restore in DB level.
Both agent and block level do this equally. Being agent based is not a factor in this capability.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
ock level do this equally. Being agent based is not a factor in this capability.
Thanks scott, I will be testing the Veeam solution also.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
t' this in production? Databases are the last thing you'd want physica
This is in Production and currently we are doing SQL native backup as the Rapid Recovery is not able to see the clustered share volume to take block level backup
-
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
t' this in production? Databases are the last thing you'd want physica
This is in Production and currently we are doing SQL native backup as the Rapid Recovery is not able to see the clustered share volume to take block level backup
Production and physical really don't go together. Physical implies that someone didn't think that this was a very important workload. Databases are the top thing to virtualize and have been universally virtualized the longest as virtualization adds stability and safety.
-
@scottalanmiller Agree scott, unfortunately Management current decision is to continue the SQL in the Physical cluster and seems they have no plans to change. If possible kindly share me some details and documents which can help me to propose the same to my management for review.
-
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
@scottalanmiller Agree scott, unfortunately Management current decision is to continue the SQL in the Physical cluster and seems they have no plans to change. If possible kindly share me some details and documents which can help me to propose the same to my management for review.
If they need documents to convince them to protect their data, we've got bigger issues. Virtualization in the industry best practice and has been for a very long time. It's safer in many ways. All benefits, no downsides. The ball is in their court to explain why they have been reckless.
-
-
@scottalanmiller Thanks Scott, really appreciate
-
@sreekumarpg said in Microsoft SQL Backup Solution:
@scottalanmiller Agree scott, unfortunately Management current decision is to continue the SQL in the Physical cluster and seems they have no plans to change. If possible kindly share me some details and documents which can help me to propose the same to my management for review.
Here's the better question - why is management making these calls? Are they IT? Do they understand modern IT practice?
