ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Meraki Replacement Plan

    IT Discussion
    8
    64
    5.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
      last edited by

      @jaredbusch said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

      @ubiquiti-user while I highly suspect the ERL could handle the workload, I would get the ER8 for a site with 100+ users.

      And once you factor in not needing a rack mount, it's not as expensive as it might be.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • scottalanmillerS
        scottalanmiller @ubiquiti-user
        last edited by

        @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

        Would you guys opt for an onsite controller or a hosted one on vultr for $6/month?

        If you ONLY have one site, go on site. If you have more than one, probably go with Vultr.

        JaredBuschJ U 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • JaredBuschJ
          JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          @scottalanmiller said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

          @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

          Would you guys opt for an onsite controller or a hosted one on vultr for $6/month?

          If you ONLY have one site, go on site. If you have more than one, probably go with Vultr.

          It is trivial to move later.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • U
            ubiquiti-user @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

            @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

            Would you guys opt for an onsite controller or a hosted one on vultr for $6/month?

            If you ONLY have one site, go on site. If you have more than one, probably go with Vultr.

            One site in one building, but there are a few walls in the way. . .

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • U
              ubiquiti-user
              last edited by

              The physical device would be the USG, correct?

              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • JaredBuschJ
                JaredBusch @ubiquiti-user
                last edited by

                @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                The physical device would be the USG, correct?

                No, you will not have the USG. That is a piece of shit, gimped ERL.

                The UniFi Controller is a VM, running Debian 9.1 preferrably.

                U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                • U
                  ubiquiti-user @JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  @jaredbusch said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                  @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                  The physical device would be the USG, correct?

                  No, you will not have the USG. That is a piece of shit, gimped ERL.

                  The UniFi Controller is a VM, running Debian 9.1 preferrably.

                  OK, that was my question. Is there a physical Unifi Controller device, or should it be run as a VM (somewhere).

                  JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • JaredBuschJ
                    JaredBusch @ubiquiti-user
                    last edited by

                    @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                    @jaredbusch said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                    @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                    The physical device would be the USG, correct?

                    No, you will not have the USG. That is a piece of shit, gimped ERL.

                    The UniFi Controller is a VM, running Debian 9.1 preferrably.

                    OK, that was my question. Is there a physical Unifi Controller device, or should it be run as a VM (somewhere).

                    They sell a stick device, but you should never use it IMO.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • coliverC
                      coliver
                      last edited by

                      If you don't have a place to run a VM locally then run it on Vultr.

                      U 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • U
                        ubiquiti-user @coliver
                        last edited by

                        @coliver said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                        If you don't have a place to run a VM locally then run it on Vultr.

                        We do, but it's due for a revamp as well

                        JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @ubiquiti-user
                          last edited by

                          @ubiquiti-user said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                          @coliver said in Meraki Replacement Plan:

                          If you don't have a place to run a VM locally then run it on Vultr.

                          We do, but it's due for a revamp as well

                          That's fine, because the controller can be backed up and then the VM deleted. A new VM can then be built and the controller restored.

                          During the downtime, your AP's will continue to work just fine. You will only lose history.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • 1
                          • 2
                          • 3
                          • 4
                          • 1 / 4
                          • First post
                            Last post