ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Securing Linux File Servers

    IT Discussion
    linux linux hardening security file server
    8
    35
    4.2k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said in Securing Linux File Servers:

      @Dashrender said in Securing Linux File Servers:

      @scottalanmiller said in Securing Linux File Servers:

      @Dashrender said in Securing Linux File Servers:

      Considering the average person working that job is making $10/hr, after benefits/taxes, etc they cost the company $15/hr minimum, assuming that was the only cost and the company made zero money for the fact that he works, the employee is working 50 hours/month. But of course almost no company is out there making zero money.. so you have to assume that they are consuming at least 50% of the income in one way or other, so the employee is working 25 hours.

      You can't include the profit from his work. If there is money to be made, either he's doing it in the remaining time or someone else will pick up the slack or someone else will be hired. Counting both the cost of the employee per hour and the profit that that employee can generate is double dipping unless the employee is irreplaceable and no one else can generate that revenue, which seems unlikely for a $10/hr position.

      It's only the $15/hr that you need to consider. Does the employee save money or waste money is all that needs to be considered. You could easily hire a stay at home mom parent to do this part time only a few hours a day while their kid is at school two or three days a week if you had any concerns about the productivity of the full time existing staff.

      Yes, the OP only needs to worry about the $15/hr part.. but the outsourced company has to consider it's profits - that's where I was going with that, I wasn't talking about the OP's company worrying about profits on an internal $15/hr employee.

      The profits of the outsourced company don't matter to the decision making, though.

      True, the only thing that matters is, can the OP hire a person and acquire the needed hardware, etc to get the job done for less?

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • DashrenderD
        Dashrender @wirestyle22
        last edited by

        @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

        @Dashrender You're confusing me man. There is an employee in medical records already. Instead of the company being paid to scan the stuff, we would do the initial project and then it would be maintained over time by her. It equates to 5 scans a day. I don't understand where the complication is here?

        5 scans a day? since the beginning? or did it drop to this number recently?

        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • wirestyle22W
          wirestyle22 @Dashrender
          last edited by

          @Dashrender said in Securing Linux File Servers:

          @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

          @Dashrender You're confusing me man. There is an employee in medical records already. Instead of the company being paid to scan the stuff, we would do the initial project and then it would be maintained over time by her. It equates to 5 scans a day. I don't understand where the complication is here?

          5 scans a day? since the beginning? or did it drop to this number recently?

          It's been this the entire time. The issue is they are charging for one huge project a year, an external hard drive and some cloud storage. 9k+ a year.

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • V
            Veet
            last edited by

            Hi,

            Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

            wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • wirestyle22W
              wirestyle22 @Veet
              last edited by

              @Veet said in Securing Linux File Servers:

              Hi,

              Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

              My company had some bad experiences with NAS and as a result are very close minded about them. This is my way around that.

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                last edited by

                @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                @Veet said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                Hi,

                Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

                My company had some bad experiences with NAS and as a result are very close minded about them. This is my way around that.

                Call it a file server. Problem solved.

                dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • dafyreD
                  dafyre @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                  @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                  @Veet said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                  Hi,

                  Perhaps I'm missing something, or have not read the entire thread properly, but why would a NAS not work over here ? Unless, the server would be performing some other function, apart from acting as a File Server ... Most NAS boxes too use Linux-based operating systems...

                  My company had some bad experiences with NAS and as a result are very close minded about them. This is my way around that.

                  Call it a file server. Problem solved.

                  And just back it up to hard drives with a network card attached. (Don't call it a NAS, lol).

                  wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • wirestyle22W
                    wirestyle22 @dafyre
                    last edited by

                    I guess I could do that but I have a server I can re-purpose for this. It would be really simple 😕

                    dafyreD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • wirestyle22W
                      wirestyle22
                      last edited by

                      Any NAS recommendations? I'd say 4 HD Max w/ raid 10. Might as well do it right.

                      scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                        last edited by

                        @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                        Any NAS recommendations? I'd say 4 HD Max w/ raid 10. Might as well do it right.

                        One without NAS in its name, like Synology or ioSafe.

                        wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • wirestyle22W
                          wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          @scottalanmiller Nothing stands out between them?

                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • dafyreD
                            dafyre @wirestyle22
                            last edited by

                            @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                            I guess I could do that but I have a server I can re-purpose for this. It would be really simple 😕

                            You've got a server to repurpose for holding the scanned data... But do you also have a server that can be repurposed to hold the backups of said data?

                            wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @wirestyle22
                              last edited by

                              @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                              @scottalanmiller Nothing stands out between them?

                              ioSafe uses Synology under the hood. So no. LOL

                              wirestyle22W 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • wirestyle22W
                                wirestyle22 @dafyre
                                last edited by

                                @dafyre said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                                @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                                I guess I could do that but I have a server I can re-purpose for this. It would be really simple 😕

                                You've got a server to repurpose for holding the scanned data... But do you also have a server that can be repurposed to hold the backups of said data?

                                Yes. Our backup servers are at 25% utilization

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • wirestyle22W
                                  wirestyle22 @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                                  @wirestyle22 said in Securing Linux File Servers:

                                  @scottalanmiller Nothing stands out between them?

                                  ioSafe uses Synology under the hood. So no. LOL

                                  So it's like HP vs. Canon. Got it.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • 1
                                  • 2
                                  • 2 / 2
                                  • First post
                                    Last post