• Proxmox 6 to 7 Errors after upgrade

    IT Discussion
    7
    0 Votes
    7 Posts
    1k Views
    CCWTechC

    @scottalanmiller Figured it out!
    dpkg --purge pve-kernel-helper
    Fixed it!

  • 1 Votes
    6 Posts
    933 Views
    JaredBuschJ

    @Eric-Ross said in CentOS 7 VM won't boot after migration to Proxmox:

    @JaredBusch Ah, too bad that wasn't the fix.

    I didn't bother at the dracut point. I likely could have recovered the system. I simply decided to stop putting off the migration of those workloads.

    They were still running CentOS 7 after all.

  • Proxmox hates security

    IT Discussion
    12
    1 Votes
    12 Posts
    1k Views
    1

    @scottalanmiller said in Proxmox hates security:

    @Pete-S said in Proxmox hates security:

    @scottalanmiller said in Proxmox hates security:

    @Pete-S said in Proxmox hates security:

    I'm not saying Proxmox is insecure, I'm just saying it wasn't designed with security as it's primary focus.
    KVM by default for instance is managed by libvirt and by default doesn't open any tcp ports at all. That gives the administrator the option to decide what level of security versus convenience they want.

    Ignoring "by default" in that, ProxMox can be the same. You can close everything up and only manage however you like. You don't have to use the web interface on it, it can be totally shut down. Obviously defeating lots of the purpose, but plausible.

    I spend far more time on ProxMox via command line via MeshCentral than via the web interface and the web interface, while we don't lock it down from the LAN in most cases (we run a LOT of ProxMox these days) we primarily access it from the PM host itself from a jump box running on top of it for the cases when the web interface is needed. So while we don't go to the degree of locking it off from the LAN, we could and we wouldn't notice the difference most of the time.

    That's not a default, so obviously totally different. But it's a really simple setting.

    That's good to know.

    We don't use gui anymore either but we're moving away from pre-packaged hypervisors and to pure KVM with libvirt compatible management tools.

    We have found that to be the best solution for our use case (high degree of automation and customization).

    I'd like to see that for sure. There's a lot of benefit to that, potentially at least.

    We're automating a lot.

    But the real problem is not the automation itself. The real problem is that automation and standardization is time consuming.

  • 7 Votes
    1 Posts
    970 Views
    No one has replied
  • Proxmo upgrades hung

    Solved IT Discussion
    4
    1 Votes
    4 Posts
    656 Views
    JaredBuschJ

    It finally finished..
    5624900b-cb96-41ee-b8f1-29373e262692-image.png

    While I was waiting, I looked at pvecm status and found out it thought I had 4 nodes (see expected votes), when I only have 2 nodes.

    76a4d9f9-18ba-4fe5-af47-4ea037892bfc-image.png

    I used pvecm expected 2 on both and suddenly the updates moved on and I was able to log in to the web interface immediately.
    d5ecd18f-8e07-4222-afea-0b04d215775c-image.png

    In the web interface, it showed a pve3 and pve4. These were some test setups I did months ago.
    I deleted the nodes from the CLI and everything looks clean again.
    782c49e5-1457-499d-8c58-5afbc3c2efda-image.png