ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    who had used webphone in freePBX

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved IT Discussion
    73 Posts 6 Posters 19.8k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • DashrenderD
      Dashrender @IT-ADMIN
      last edited by

      @IT-ADMIN said:

      @Dashrender said:

      @scottalanmiller said:

      @IT-ADMIN said:

      @Dashrender said:

      And you'll need to expose your PBX to the internet to make this work.

      not necessarily, a port forward will do the job without exposing you PBX with a public ip

      Still exposed, but not fully. Better than nothing.

      I'm not sure how this is different? OK it's a bit different, and it's exactly how I would expect nearly anyone to set it up, only opening the required ports to the outside.

      yes but there is a difference between giving your PBX a public ip or put it in the DMZ and port forward

      Sure, but I also didn't say to give it a public IP, I said that you'd need to expose it to the internet - which you do through a DMZ NAT Port setup as well as by giving a public IP. 🙂

      IT-ADMINI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • IT-ADMINI
        IT-ADMIN @Dashrender
        last edited by

        @Dashrender said:

        Sure, but I also didn't say to give it a public IP, I said that you'd need to expose it to the internet - which you do through a DMZ NAT Port setup as well as by giving a public IP. 🙂

        sure i understand what you mean, i just get scared by the term exposing lol, i prefer using the term port forward for security reason 🙂

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @IT-ADMIN
          last edited by

          @IT-ADMIN said:

          port forward is more secure than exposing your entire PBX to the cloud

          Very true

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
            last edited by JaredBusch

            @scottalanmiller said:

            @IT-ADMIN said:

            port forward is more secure than exposing your entire PBX to the cloud

            Very true

            And also completely irrelevant. Because to make this work you are port forwarding the ports for a device to register to your PBX. This is a huge attack vector and not something you ever want to do without very solid IP restrictions IMO.

            DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch
              last edited by

              @IT-ADMIN said:

              ozeki XE IP PBX

              ok, I just read up on the Ozeki website.

              This is a gimmick that I would never want setup.

              Who in their right mind wants to allow anyone in the world to go to your webpage and then call any number they want?

              You are wanting to pay for everyone to call whoever they want?

              That is what you will be getting into with just a single configuration error.

              scottalanmillerS IT-ADMINI 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                last edited by

                @JaredBusch said:

                @IT-ADMIN said:

                ozeki XE IP PBX

                ok, I just read up on the Ozeki website.

                This is a gimmick that I would never want setup.

                Who in their right mind wants to allow anyone in the world to go to your webpage and then call any number they want?

                You are wanting to pay for everyone to call whoever they want?

                That is what you will be getting into with just a single configuration error.

                In his defense, I once had Xerox do basically the same thing with POTS lines. I ended up with a home phone with unlimited (ha ha, just one line) global calling, for free.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • DashrenderD
                  Dashrender @JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  @JaredBusch said:

                  @scottalanmiller said:

                  @IT-ADMIN said:

                  port forward is more secure than exposing your entire PBX to the cloud

                  Very true

                  And also completely irrelevant. Because to make this work you are port forwarding the ports for a device to register to your PBX. This is a huge attack vector and not something you ever want to do without very solid IP restrictions IMO.

                  While I understand the thought process here, Have you seen successful attacks on this vector? Completely disabling this does limit some pretty cool options - like VOIPER on your phone acting like a PBX phone.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    @Dashrender said:

                    While I understand the thought process here, Have you seen successful attacks on this vector? Completely disabling this does limit some pretty cool options - like VOIPER on your phone acting like a PBX phone.

                    Through forwarded ports? Yes.

                    DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • DashrenderD
                      Dashrender @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by

                      @scottalanmiller said:

                      @Dashrender said:

                      While I understand the thought process here, Have you seen successful attacks on this vector? Completely disabling this does limit some pretty cool options - like VOIPER on your phone acting like a PBX phone.

                      Through forwarded ports? Yes.

                      Yes, through forwarded ports - I can think of nearly no reason to put something directly on the public internet.

                      Though - that brings up a question - how do you secure cloud services when you buy a server through them? Correct me if I'm wrong, you are pretty much stuck with only using the built-in software firewall on the server, right? Or paying some additional fee for them to NAT/firewall you, if that's even an option.

                      scottalanmillerS JaredBuschJ 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • scottalanmillerS
                        scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                        last edited by

                        @Dashrender said:

                        Though - that brings up a question - how do you secure cloud services when you buy a server through them?

                        Cloud services are not yours to secure.

                        I assume that you mean "how do you secure a cloud computing instance of IaaS?"

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • JaredBuschJ
                          JaredBusch @Dashrender
                          last edited by

                          @Dashrender said:

                          Though - that brings up a question - how do you secure cloud services when you buy a server through them? Correct me if I'm wrong, you are pretty much stuck with only using the built-in software firewall on the server, right? Or paying some additional fee for them to NAT/firewall you, if that's even an option.

                          Different topic IMO, but basically if it is SSH, then you disable password log in and require keys.

                          For other services, restrict to IP is possible. Finally, long passwords.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • scottalanmillerS
                            scottalanmiller @Dashrender
                            last edited by

                            @Dashrender said:

                            Correct me if I'm wrong, you are pretty much stuck with only using the built-in software firewall on the server, right? Or paying some additional fee for them to NAT/firewall you, if that's even an option.

                            If you mean cloud IaaS like Amazon or Rackspace then.... you buy a firewall. With RS, as an example, you get both Cisco Firewall and F5 LoadBalancers to sit in front of your workloads if you want. Plus you typically would build your own application layer that sits in front of other workloads too.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • IT-ADMINI
                              IT-ADMIN @JaredBusch
                              last edited by

                              @JaredBusch said:

                              You are wanting to pay for everyone to call whoever they want?

                              No, the webphone will be able to call only my internal extension (customer service agent's phone) not any number

                              JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • IT-ADMINI
                                IT-ADMIN
                                last edited by

                                in the HTML code you can remove the keypad and keep only one button (Call Us) kind of pilot number and then the call will be forwarded to all of our agents (set up a dial plan for incoming calls from the webphone to extension 401,402,403...)

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by

                                  Have you found a good third party web code option yet?

                                  IT-ADMINI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • IT-ADMINI
                                    IT-ADMIN @scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    @scottalanmiller said:

                                    Have you found a good third party web code option yet?

                                    Not yet, but i found an option called webRTC in freePBX, it is not a webphone but similar in some sort

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • IT-ADMINI
                                      IT-ADMIN
                                      last edited by

                                      http://schmoozecom.com/video/webrtc-softphone.php

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • JaredBuschJ
                                        JaredBusch @IT-ADMIN
                                        last edited by

                                        @IT-ADMIN said:

                                        No, the webphone will be able to call only my internal extension (customer service agent's phone) not any number

                                        I realize that. But as I said, it is only s single misconfiguration from an open system. Or even a single PHP/Perl/Javascript exploit away.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • 1
                                        • 2
                                        • 3
                                        • 4
                                        • 4 / 4
                                        • First post
                                          Last post