ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Solved Network backbone compatibility question

    IT Discussion
    5
    15
    545
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      James
      last edited by

      Hey everyone, we are looking to do an upgrade in the future with some of our systems but have ran into a question that could change how we do this upgrade.

      Currently we run with HP DL380p's hooked into a network switch cluster and a storage cage. We use a 10GB backbone with CX-4 to handle the data transfer.

      The question we have now is will the HP Gen 9+10 platforms support CX-4, or will we need to upgrade our 10Gb backbone to a newer installation such as fiber optic?

      Any thoughts on this are appreciated!

      JaredBuschJ scottalanmillerS 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @James
        last edited by

        @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

        The question we have now is will the HP Gen 9+10 platforms support CX-4, or will we need to upgrade our 10Gb backbone to a newer installation such as fiber optic?

        That depends on how it is connected. Is it a standard PCI-X card or a proprietary module?

        J 1 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • J
          James @JaredBusch
          last edited by

          @jaredbusch said in Network backbone compatibility question:

          @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

          The question we have now is will the HP Gen 9+10 platforms support CX-4, or will we need to upgrade our 10Gb backbone to a newer installation such as fiber optic?

          That depends on how it is connected. Is it a standard PCI-X card or a proprietary module?

          Hey Jared, these are standard PCI-X expansion cards. We are using the
          Intel EXPX9502CX4 10 Gigabit Dual Port CX4 Server Adapter.

          1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • 1
            1337 @JaredBusch
            last edited by

            @jaredbusch said in Network backbone compatibility question:

            standard PCI-X card

            You are confusing PCI-X (PCI eXtended) with PCIe (PCI Express).

            It was a long time since PCI-X was the standard. PCIe is the standard today.

            JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • 1
              1337 @James
              last edited by 1337

              @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

              We are using the
              Intel EXPX9502CX4 10 Gigabit Dual Port CX4 Server Adapter.

              Any card would work in a newer server since PCIe is backwards compatible.

              The only question when upgrading would be if you have driver support within your new OS and if you have to follow some kind of HCI. And performance of course - since it will stay the same while the newer servers are likely faster.

              J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • J
                James @1337
                last edited by

                @pete-s Gotcha, so while upgrading to fiber instead of staying on CX-4 could be beneficial, if needed the capability of using CX-4 is still available at the max rate speed of the PCI card itself.

                1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • 1
                  1337 @James
                  last edited by 1337

                  @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                  @pete-s Gotcha, so while upgrading to fiber instead of staying on CX-4 could be beneficial, if needed the capability of using CX-4 is still available at the max rate speed of the PCI card itself.

                  Yes. The Intel card is PCIe 2.0 card and need a x8 wide slot. So it will work the same in a newer server with PCI 3.0 or 4.0 in a x8 or x16 slot.

                  x1 to x16 is just how many PCIe lanes you have in the connector.
                  pcie_slots.gif

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • DashrenderD
                    Dashrender
                    last edited by

                    Didn't someone say PCI-X before? thought that was a completely different slot?

                    J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • J
                      James @Dashrender
                      last edited by

                      @dashrender The PCI-X reference I believe was @JaredBusch asking what kind of connection it was with PCI versus a proprietary HP module. It seems like this card is definitely a PCI-E card.

                      63376967-0dce-4bb9-ba2c-058418ebe5a3-image.png

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @James
                        last edited by

                        @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                        @dashrender The PCI-X reference I believe was @JaredBusch asking what kind of connection it was with PCI versus a proprietary HP module. It seems like this card is definitely a PCI-E card.

                        63376967-0dce-4bb9-ba2c-058418ebe5a3-image.png

                        Then you should be good to go.

                        J 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • J
                          James @JaredBusch
                          last edited by

                          @jaredbusch said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                          @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                          @dashrender The PCI-X reference I believe was @JaredBusch asking what kind of connection it was with PCI versus a proprietary HP module. It seems like this card is definitely a PCI-E card.

                          63376967-0dce-4bb9-ba2c-058418ebe5a3-image.png

                          Then you should be good to go.

                          Awesome. Thank you everyone for your input.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch @1337
                            last edited by

                            @pete-s said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                            @jaredbusch said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                            standard PCI-X card

                            You are confusing PCI-X (PCI eXtended) with PCIe (PCI Express).

                            It was a long time since PCI-X was the standard. PCIe is the standard today.

                            I'm not confusing anything. I simply typed PCI-X out of old habit.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller @James
                              last edited by

                              @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                              The question we have now is will the HP Gen 9+10 platforms support CX-4, or will we need to upgrade our 10Gb backbone to a newer installation such as fiber optic?

                              Don't think of fiber as newer. Fiber is still sub-optimal. You never want fiber until it offers you something you were missing... like distance or RF interference avoidance. Overall, copper is vastly preferred until it runs into a problem that fiber can solve.

                              J JaredBuschJ 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • J
                                James @scottalanmiller
                                last edited by

                                @scottalanmiller said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                                @james said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                                The question we have now is will the HP Gen 9+10 platforms support CX-4, or will we need to upgrade our 10Gb backbone to a newer installation such as fiber optic?

                                Don't think of fiber as newer. Fiber is still sub-optimal. You never want fiber until it offers you something you were missing... like distance or RF interference avoidance. Overall, copper is vastly preferred until it runs into a problem that fiber can solve.

                                Did some more research after I saw your comment and I would have to agree with you on this now. We will keep this in mind while thinking about our speed problems here. Everything is same rack or adjacent rack so copper should be fine.

                                I appreciate the input.

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • JaredBuschJ
                                  JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                                  last edited by JaredBusch

                                  @scottalanmiller said in Network backbone compatibility question:

                                  You never want fiber until it offers you something you were missing...

                                  I love to use fiber for inter-switch connections. Pretty much every switch on the planet has SFP available. Why waste the ports?

                                  I'm still only using them as 1gigabit ports though.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • 1 / 1
                                  • First post
                                    Last post