Reconsidering ProxMox
-
@Doyler3000 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:
Well since I use this forum a lot and I don't want to be seen as 'weird' I'll try to explain where I was coming from.
Not that you seem weird, just this one thing is what we call "being weird", or at least feels like it.
We all act weird sometimes. -
@Doyler3000 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:
and then SAM saying that he uses qcow2 on lvm-thin mostly and it was the default for Proxmox.
I said that? I must have mispoke.
-
@Doyler3000 said in Reconsidering ProxMox:
As regards moving to an appliance - I'm comfortable with KVM but I run our VM infrastructure mostly on my own. On occasions where I'm on holiday or otherwise unavailable, it would be helpful if at least a couple of others could administer the system (particularly backups).
Totally makes sense. I'm the same. We have a much larger pool of people for ProxMox support than we do for non-ProxMox KVM support. It's nice to let the bigger pool handle general tasks. And the web interface is really nice.
-
So, looking at Proxmox for a new deployment. I'll be dropping it on a spare laptop tomorrow to kick the tires.
Looking at Proxmox over KVM simply for the GUI backup features.
Anyone have any comments since they have fully released the backup stuff?
-
I have not tried the new Backup Server yet.
I do use the built-in PVE backup. -
A comment about the default install. With 6.3 on a system with a single disk, it used ext4 by default.
-
and logging in, it looks like LVM-thin is right there.
-
Uploading an ISO was simplicity. Not sure how/why the entire dicsussion above happened about using a USB....
-
@JaredBusch Oh, I assume because of this option?
Fuck that. No one does that anywhere. The feature exists in every Hypervisor. But seriously, no one uses it.
-
So what is the confusion about storage. It is not like you have an option when making a VM.
These were the defaults I saw.
-
Not sure why LSI is "default, but VirtIO was selected? I left it alone.
-
Going to have to RTFM soon, but WTF with a firewall enabled?
I do not want my hypervisor doing jack shit to my instances.
-
Wonder what they could do about Firefox thinking it is a pop up.
When Vultr pops the console, Firefox does not bitch like this.
-
I mainly used the built-in backup in PVE excluding a couple of VMs that is being backed up via Proxmox Backup Server.
For backups in PVE, I use the ZSTD for compression and Snapshots mode instead of supsend or stop.For backups in PBS, I have garbage collection schedule set to run once week, prune is scheduled daily and it's set to keep the last 7 snapshots. I haven't tried its sync jobs (I assume its for syncing backups to another backup server. I have read the manual.).
-
@JaredBusch said in Reconsidering ProxMox:
Going to have to RTFM soon, but WTF with a firewall enabled?
I do not want my hypervisor doing jack shit to my instances.
Although is selected, it's not active.
-
There's a firewall setting at the Datacenter (cluster) level, for each PVE hosts and for each VM/Container.
-
@black3dynamite said in Reconsidering ProxMox:
There's a firewall setting at the Datacenter (cluster) level, for each PVE hosts and for each VM/Container.
I get reasons that it could be beneficial. But for the typical SMB, that should never really happen.
I did say I have not RTFM at all yet.
-
I haven't played with it for over 5 years. I never got past a brief test, as I relocated to TX for a new position.
It seems others have found it effective however.
-
@jclambert said in Reconsidering ProxMox:
I haven't played with it for over 5 years. I never got past a brief test, as I relocated to TX for a new position.
It seems others have found it effective however.
5 years ago I would not ever touch ProxMox. It was a pile of flaming garbage.
-
Tried installing last night, but gave up. Don't think it likes my motherboard SATA.
Complained about not finding HDCouldn't be bothered working it out so went back to ESXi :).
May try again if i bring a Dell T server home with me in the new year.
