ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    IOPS for SSD?

    IT Discussion
    ssd storage servers iops sas sas ssd
    6
    33
    4.1k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • wrx7mW
      wrx7m
      last edited by wrx7m

      I am building out a new R740XD and am curious what the IOPS would be for a mix use 2.5" SAS SSD. Specifically, this one -
      https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-800gb-ssd-sas-mix-use-12gbps-512e-25in-hot-plug-drive-pm1645/apd/400-azii/storage-drives-media#polaris-pd

      Is there a standard ball-park number to assign to SSDs?

      1 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • 1
        1337 @wrx7m
        last edited by

        @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

        I am building out a new R740XD and am curious what the IOPS would be for a mix use 2.5" SAS SSD. Specifically, this one -
        https://www.dell.com/en-us/shop/dell-800gb-ssd-sas-mix-use-12gbps-512e-25in-hot-plug-drive-pm1645/apd/400-azii/storage-drives-media#polaris-pd

        Is there a standard ball-park number to assign to SSDs?

        Specs for that drive:
        PM1645.png

        wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • 1
          1337 @wrx7m
          last edited by 1337

          @wrx7m
          BTW, do you really need "mixed use"-drives? Most people's workloads can be handled easily with "read intensive" drives.

          The key metric is the DWPD. Are you writing 800x3=2.4TB each day on average to the drive?

          Read intensive drives are usually around 1 DPDW. So that equals 800GB per day on 800GB drives.

          All these numbers have to be multiplied to account for the entire array. For instance 800GB data to a RAID10 array with four drives is just 400GB per drive. So a four drive RAID10 array can handle 1.6TB per day using read-intensive drives. That is still a huge amount of data.

          But let the price decide. Dell have huge margins on their SSD drives. That's why they are twice the price compared to buying the same drive from the manufacturer directly.

          scottalanmillerS DashrenderD 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • scottalanmillerS
            scottalanmiller @1337
            last edited by

            @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

            BTW, do you really need "mixed use"-drives? Most people's workloads can be handled easily with "read intensive" drives.

            Good point. Mixed use tends to be write heavy databases.

            wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller @1337
              last edited by

              @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

              So a four drive RAID10 array can handle 1.6TB per day using read-intensive drives. That is still a huge amount of data.

              It's a bit, yeah 😉

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @1337
                last edited by

                @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

                But let the price decide. Dell have huge margins on their SSD drives. That's why they are twice the price compared to buying the same drive from the manufacturer directly.

                As Scott has pointed out before to me, the higher price isn't just them padding (but that is definitely there IMO), but that the manufacturers also have their own custom firmware on these drives that interact with their backend systems/RAID cards, etc.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • wrx7mW
                  wrx7m @scottalanmiller
                  last edited by

                  @scottalanmiller said in IOPS for SSD?:

                  @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

                  BTW, do you really need "mixed use"-drives? Most people's workloads can be handled easily with "read intensive" drives.

                  Good point. Mixed use tends to be write heavy databases.

                  Well, we do have quite a few DBs, Including a SQL server that has all data replicated from our ERP system in real time. I would say that and the PRTG server see the most write. That being said, I don't think they are "traditionally" write intensive. I picked mixed-use, because the drive would be part of a RAID5 array where the workload would be mixed.

                  Should I pursue SSDs spec'd for read?

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @wrx7m
                    last edited by

                    @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                    Should I pursue SSDs spec'd for read?

                    Probably

                    wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • wrx7mW
                      wrx7m @scottalanmiller
                      last edited by wrx7m

                      @scottalanmiller said in IOPS for SSD?:

                      @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                      Should I pursue SSDs spec'd for read?

                      Probably

                      That will be good then. The drives for Read are much less expensive.

                      Edit: Not considerably, but notably less expensive. about $200 cheaper and you get an additional 160GB.

                      DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • wrx7mW
                        wrx7m @1337
                        last edited by

                        @Pete-S Where did you find this matrix? I am looking for one for a 960GB RI SSD now.

                        1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • 1
                          1337 @wrx7m
                          last edited by 1337

                          @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                          @Pete-S Where did you find this matrix? I am looking for one for a 960GB RI SSD now.

                          You need to find out what drive it actually is first. Usually it's Samsung or Intel.

                          Samsung are called things like PM1635, SM883 and Intel have names like P4610, S3510 etc.
                          Sometimes you'll find the actual part number like MZ7KM960HMJP-00005. Just search for it then.

                          wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • wrx7mW
                            wrx7m @1337
                            last edited by

                            @Pete-S Thanks. This one is harder to find. Dell has several 960GB 2.5" SSD RI SAS drives on their site and the server configuration doesn't list the part numbers, but does list DWPD and TBW, but then their individual drive purchase options don't list those figures. At least, not that I have seen for this capacity.

                            1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • 1
                              1337 @wrx7m
                              last edited by

                              @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                              @Pete-S Thanks. This one is harder to find. Dell has several 960GB 2.5" SSD RI SAS drives on their site and the server configuration doesn't list the part numbers, but does list DWPD and TBW, but then their individual drive purchase options don't list those figures. At least, not that I have seen for this capacity.

                              Do you have a link?

                              wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • DashrenderD
                                Dashrender @wrx7m
                                last edited by

                                @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                @scottalanmiller said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                Should I pursue SSDs spec'd for read?

                                Probably

                                That will be good then. The drives for Read are much less expensive.

                                Edit: Not considerably, but notably less expensive. about $200 cheaper and you get an additional 160GB.

                                This is totally expected. Write heavy SSDs need more cells to move into when you hit write thresholds.

                                1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • wrx7mW
                                  wrx7m @1337
                                  last edited by

                                  @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                  @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                  @Pete-S Thanks. This one is harder to find. Dell has several 960GB 2.5" SSD RI SAS drives on their site and the server configuration doesn't list the part numbers, but does list DWPD and TBW, but then their individual drive purchase options don't list those figures. At least, not that I have seen for this capacity.

                                  Do you have a link?

                                  Could be this one, but there are several that it could be on their search results.
                                  https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/accessories/apd/400-bdqr

                                  1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • wrx7mW
                                    wrx7m
                                    last edited by

                                    This is the storage config for the server-
                                    bb6a7942-953c-4839-ad9a-9ef14b78df3a-image.png

                                    1 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • 1
                                      1337 @Dashrender
                                      last edited by 1337

                                      @Dashrender said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                      @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                      @scottalanmiller said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                      @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                      Should I pursue SSDs spec'd for read?

                                      Probably

                                      That will be good then. The drives for Read are much less expensive.

                                      Edit: Not considerably, but notably less expensive. about $200 cheaper and you get an additional 160GB.

                                      This is totally expected. Write heavy SSDs need more cells to move into when you hit write thresholds.

                                      That is normally not the case. They use different NAND chips in the different models.
                                      You will not get three times the endurance by just reserving a couple of hundred gigs extra.

                                      For instance Samsung's latest pairing PM883 and SM883 have the same capacity models. PM883 uses Samsung 64-layer TLC V-NAND while the higher endurance SM883 uses Samsung 64-layer MLC V-NAND.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • 1
                                        1337 @wrx7m
                                        last edited by 1337

                                        @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                        @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                        @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                        @Pete-S Thanks. This one is harder to find. Dell has several 960GB 2.5" SSD RI SAS drives on their site and the server configuration doesn't list the part numbers, but does list DWPD and TBW, but then their individual drive purchase options don't list those figures. At least, not that I have seen for this capacity.

                                        Do you have a link?

                                        Could be this one, but there are several that it could be on their search results.
                                        https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/accessories/apd/400-bdqr

                                        The full name of that says: Dell 960GB SSD SATA Read Intensive 6Gbps 512e, 2.5in Drive in 3.5in Hybrid Carrier S4510.

                                        S4510 in the product description being the magic number here. That's an Intel drive. Just look for Intel S4510 960GB drive and you'll find it.

                                        PS. Here you go:
                                        https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/134912/intel-ssd-d3-s4510-series-960gb-2-5in-sata-6gb-s-3d2-tlc.html

                                        wrx7mW 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • wrx7mW
                                          wrx7m @1337
                                          last edited by

                                          @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                          @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                          @Pete-S said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                          @wrx7m said in IOPS for SSD?:

                                          @Pete-S Thanks. This one is harder to find. Dell has several 960GB 2.5" SSD RI SAS drives on their site and the server configuration doesn't list the part numbers, but does list DWPD and TBW, but then their individual drive purchase options don't list those figures. At least, not that I have seen for this capacity.

                                          Do you have a link?

                                          Could be this one, but there are several that it could be on their search results.
                                          https://www.dell.com/en-us/work/shop/accessories/apd/400-bdqr

                                          The full name of that says: Dell 960GB SSD SATA Read Intensive 6Gbps 512e, 2.5in Drive in 3.5in Hybrid Carrier S4510.

                                          S4510 in the product description being the magic number here. That's an Intel drive. Just look for Intel S4510 960GB drive and you'll find it.

                                          PS. Here you go:
                                          https://ark.intel.com/content/www/us/en/ark/products/134912/intel-ssd-d3-s4510-series-960gb-2-5in-sata-6gb-s-3d2-tlc.html

                                          Oh, I see. OK. Thanks for pointing out the obvious 🙂
                                          Too bad the server config doesn't tell you exactly which drives they are.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • wrx7mW
                                            wrx7m
                                            last edited by

                                            I overlooked the fact that one was only 6Gbps. I found another one that showed 12Gbps and it had KPM5XRUG960G at the end. I googled that and it seems that one is a Kioxia/Toshiba drive. The DWPD matches the Dell server config description of "1"

                                            https://www.span.com/product/KIOXIA-PM5-R-Toshiba-SSD-Read-Intensive-SIE-KPM5XRUG960G-2-5-SAS-12Gb-960GB-SSD~69373

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post