Unsolved Annoying Apple Issue - SMB - Finder issue
-
Isn’t smb version v1 disable on server 2016 compare to 2008 r2?
-
@black3dynamite said in Annoying Apple Issue - SMB - Finder issue:
Isn’t smb version v1 disable on server 2016 compare to 2008 r2?
I don't believe it is, I have to check.
-
So still doing digging on this to try and pinpoint the issue a bit more as CIFS is a meh approach to this. . .
It seems that Apples' SMBX protocol does some weird things:
Opportunistic locking sounds a lot like "I'm taking these files because maybe you might need them, but who honestly knows.
That there is a big freaking issue, who would ever want a client system to lock an entire network share?!
-
@dustinb3403 This doesn't even sound like a bug, more like intentional crippling. Is there some proprietary Apple file sharing protocol they want people using?
-
@dustinb3403 said in Annoying Apple Issue - SMB - Finder issue:
@black3dynamite said in Annoying Apple Issue - SMB - Finder issue:
Isn’t smb version v1 disable on server 2016 compare to 2008 r2?
I don't believe it is, I have to check.
It is
-
@bnrstnr said in Annoying Apple Issue - SMB - Finder issue:
@dustinb3403 This doesn't even sound like a bug, more like intentional crippling. Is there some proprietary Apple file sharing protocol they want people using?
Well, there is speculation of that. But it is not documented and Apple kept it even after their reasons for doing so (promoting their own SMB server that addressed it with a patch) were gone. It's known as a "bug" and Apple has admitted to it as a bug that they don't care to fix.
So.... read in as you will.
