Zertø Virtual Replication
-
@JaredBusch said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
Have any of you looked at Zertø?
I just found someone using it and they love it.
https://www.zerto.com/zerto-virtual-replication-version-5-0/
I saw them at Pure//Accelerate and they say that they are more for replication, similar to Veeam, but solely focus on replication. They say that they do it faster because of their proprietary compression and deduplication of the data on the way to the secondary site.
I've never used them before, so take that with a grain of salt.
-
Isn't Zerto the one that is unstable and can corrupt your storage because it depends on a deprecated and never production released kernel hook - so its' not a supported product. It's a big deal that Veeam just released something like this because Veeam is the first to do it with Vmware support. Zerto has been doing it and has been done to down VMware from messing with the kernel in inappropriate ways.
-
@NerdyDad said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
They say that they do it faster because of their proprietary compression and deduplication of the data on the way to the secondary site.
No, they do it faster because they bypass the security layer of the kernel.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@NerdyDad said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
They say that they do it faster because of their proprietary compression and deduplication of the data on the way to the secondary site.
No, they do it faster because they bypass the security layer of the kernel.
There ya go. Marketing versus the truth.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@NerdyDad said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
They say that they do it faster because of their proprietary compression and deduplication of the data on the way to the secondary site.
No, they do it faster because they bypass the security layer of the kernel.
Any article links to this type of information?
-
@JaredBusch said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@scottalanmiller said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@NerdyDad said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
They say that they do it faster because of their proprietary compression and deduplication of the data on the way to the secondary site.
No, they do it faster because they bypass the security layer of the kernel.
Any article links to this type of information?
I don't know if I can divulge my sources
-
Here is a reference to it, but not very much info.
-
here is @hutchingsp mentioning it on SW last year...
-
Was briefly excited at the product premise, then read the rest of the thread.
Would be great to start a product review database that was not "review/opinion" but more "facts"
-
@bigbear said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
Was briefly excited at the product premise, then read the rest of the thread.
Would be great to start a product review database that was not "review/opinion" but more "facts"
Get excited about Veeam. It's adding this in version 10, but without the kernel hook problem.
-
@scottalanmiller I haven't heard of Veeam since maybe 2009 or 2008. I feel like it was just getting started then.
This is basically realtime data protection, full fidelity backups? Perusing their website now...
-
@bigbear said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@scottalanmiller I haven't heard of Veeam since maybe 2009 or 2008. I feel like it was just getting started then.
This is basically realtime data protection, full fidelity backups? Perusing their website now...
Veeam has been the top player in the backup space for most of the 2010s. They are pretty much the only big name in backups and disaster recovery any more. They are so big that they are a driving factor as to why Vmware and Hyper-V adoption has been so high. Many people base their hypervisor decisions on what Veeam supports!
-
@bigbear said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
This is basically realtime data protection, full fidelity backups? Perusing their website now...
They do nearly everything backup and DR related. Continuous backups, full backups, agent backups, agentless backups...
-
@scottalanmiller said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@bigbear said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@scottalanmiller I haven't heard of Veeam since maybe 2009 or 2008. I feel like it was just getting started then.
This is basically realtime data protection, full fidelity backups? Perusing their website now...
Veeam has been the top player in the backup space for most of the 2010s. They are pretty much the only big name in backups and disaster recovery any more. They are so big that they are a driving factor as to why Vmware and Hyper-V adoption has been so high. Many people base their hypervisor decisions on what Veeam supports!
also if one is looking for money considerations, hyper-v 2016 has it's own replication. it's one-to-one, but it runs up to every 5 seconds rpo if needed (and loads are not devastating - but usually they aren't in smb). and rto is really fast even with mmc snap-in.
I'm currently running hyper-v native replication + altaro for backups. Can understand other solutions for vmware, but on hyper-v on replication you have to beat hyper-v itself price-wise and veeam on reliability. Also with veeam you get backup. zerto "just" replicates: you need additional money for backup.
-
Do they have a cloud backup (monthly) solution or do you have to license and deploy your own Veeam server?
Definitely looks like a lot has changed. I have not really had any concern or interest in something like this in a long time.
-
And my goal is just to backup this single multi-purpose server I have deployed so I can bare-metal restore it and all the data whenever necessary. I doubt I will have need to back up any other systems with is.
-
@JaredBusch maybe in the vmware ecosystem it can fit, but I do not see any fit for it in hyper-v
-
There isn't a Veeam cloud solution yet (I'm sure there will probably be one eventually). But what is not to say that you couldn't have a free Veeam server in Vultr or something?
-
So Veeam free for Server 2016 as an agent and then you buy Veeam? for your server/repository?
-
@matteo-nunziati said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@scottalanmiller said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@bigbear said in Zertø Virtual Replication:
@scottalanmiller I haven't heard of Veeam since maybe 2009 or 2008. I feel like it was just getting started then.
This is basically realtime data protection, full fidelity backups? Perusing their website now...
Veeam has been the top player in the backup space for most of the 2010s. They are pretty much the only big name in backups and disaster recovery any more. They are so big that they are a driving factor as to why Vmware and Hyper-V adoption has been so high. Many people base their hypervisor decisions on what Veeam supports!
also if one is looking for money considerations, hyper-v 2016 has it's own replication. it's one-to-one, but it runs up to every 5 seconds rpo if needed (and loads are not devastating - but usually they aren't in smb). and rto is really fast even with mmc snap-in.
I'm currently running hyper-v native replication + altaro for backups. Can understand other solutions for vmware, but on hyper-v on replication you have to beat hyper-v itself price-wise and veeam on reliability. Also with veeam you get backup. zerto "just" replicates: you need additional money for backup.
This is great for long distance (over the WAN), but when local, I know of no case where you'd use this. You'd always use Starwind instead. Vastly more powerful, same price. Free.
