Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
Something to compare... when is the last time you bought a machien that shipped with Linux and tried to run Windows on it? Or one meant for Linux? Go ahead, put Windows 10 on your Raspberry Pi, see how well it works. We always compare a system custom designed and built for Windows and THEN try to see if Linux can work on it with no planning. Try the opposite and I bet you'll find that the degree of issues with Windows is 10x or even 100x what you see with Linux on Windows-intended machines.
I don't have a personal need for Windows on any hardware Linux is on natively. What would I use Windows on a Pi for? I don't even need a Pi with Linux on it.
I mean I get your point and you're right... but still not the same because if I bought an Asus gaming laptop that came with Linux on it with all hardware components working 100%... sure. Then I can also assume the drivers that are being used on it won't work on other Linux Distros. But, I do know it would work if I put Windows on it. Because it already does.
-
But I think that this discussion is proving my point and the article's point, right? The people seeing Linux as hard are coming FROM Windows, right? But if I get Linux for my sister in law who barely uses a computer she says it "just works and is so much better than what she had." That's the entire point, that people with Windows experience perceive issues with Linux that those without the Windows experience tend not to have issues with.
-
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
I mean I get your point and you're right... but still not the same because if I bought an Asus gaming laptop that came with Linux on it with all hardware components working 100%... sure. Then I can also assume the drivers that are being used on it won't work on other Linux Distros.
Right, just like the ones that come with Windows. Although often they would.
-
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
But, I do know it would work if I put Windows on it. Because it already does.
Because it's a Windows laptop, right? Asus only makes Windows machines. That's my point. We only test Linux under unfair conditions. Windows gets a free pass that someone tested every component for one specific version for us. Do the same thing with a Linux distro and Linux has all the same advantages. We are holding Linux to a higher standard we'd enver consider holding Windows to because we know it would miserably fail.
-
It's much like the dual booting problem. People used to complaint hat Linux was hard because of how difficult it was to get it to work with Windows while dual booting. But Windows was EVEN HARDER to use that way, but people ignored that and only considered the problem to be a Linux one, even thought Linux was doing things that Windows could not even do and maybe still can't.
In reality, what they were seeing was Linux blowing Windows out of the water in boot loader handling, but the common response was that Linux was hard and Windows was easy - while they had just demonstrated the very opposite.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
But I think that this discussion is proving my point and the article's point, right? The people seeing Linux as hard are coming FROM Windows, right? But if I get Linux for my sister in law who barely uses a computer she says it "just works and is so much better than what she had." That's the entire point, that people with Windows experience perceive issues with Linux that those without the Windows experience tend not to have issues with.
That's not a Linux thing, though.
That means you are giving your sister in law an appliance. Really, a web browsing and email appliance. A stripped down piece of hardware with basic components and minimal functionality, that's pretty much restricted. That's why it "just works".
You can do that with anything, not just Linux.
Now, if she decides to do anything else with it... boom, it will no longer work. What if she buys a new mouse? A web cam? An external video card? I dunno, just giving examples to make a point. It won't "just work" like you are saying.
-
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
But I think that this discussion is proving my point and the article's point, right? The people seeing Linux as hard are coming FROM Windows, right? But if I get Linux for my sister in law who barely uses a computer she says it "just works and is so much better than what she had." That's the entire point, that people with Windows experience perceive issues with Linux that those without the Windows experience tend not to have issues with.
That's not a Linux thing, though.
That means you are giving your sister in law an appliance. Really, a web browsing and email appliance. A stripped down piece of hardware with basic components and minimal functionality, that's pretty much restricted. That's why it "just works".
You can do that with anything, not just Linux.
Except doing the exact same thing with windows didn't work as well. So you can do it with anything... that's easily like Linux. It wasn't stripped down or special, it was a full Ubuntu OS. If a normal Windows desktop is an appliance, then... okay. But that's a weird way to think of it.
-
@Tim_G
But, things are slowly turning around... so we'll see.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
But I think that this discussion is proving my point and the article's point, right? The people seeing Linux as hard are coming FROM Windows, right? But if I get Linux for my sister in law who barely uses a computer she says it "just works and is so much better than what she had." That's the entire point, that people with Windows experience perceive issues with Linux that those without the Windows experience tend not to have issues with.
That's not a Linux thing, though.
That means you are giving your sister in law an appliance. Really, a web browsing and email appliance. A stripped down piece of hardware with basic components and minimal functionality, that's pretty much restricted. That's why it "just works".
You can do that with anything, not just Linux.
Except doing the exact same thing with windows didn't work as well. So you can do it with anything... that's easily like Linux. It wasn't stripped down or special, it was a full Ubuntu OS. If a normal Windows desktop is an appliance, then... okay. But that's a weird way to think of it.
In your example, what made the computer unusable? What was the issue? Why did Windows not work, but Ubuntu did?
-
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
Now, if she decides to do anything else with it... boom, it will no longer work. What if she buys a new mouse? A web cam? An external video card? I dunno, just giving examples to make a point. It won't "just work" like you are saying.
But that's stuff I was pointing out. I've not tested with an external video card... ever on any OS. I have a web cam ready right now, so I'll test. But my POINT above was specifically that things like printers and such were EASIER on Linux because Windows didn't handle them well and had all kinds of problems. You keep saying that Linux won't work, but for the people who aren't Windows users, they seem to find that it does work - really well.
I'm not seeing these issues that you see. Sure, initial install is a pain sometimes because of using untested Windows gear, but past that, I've never seen these issues.
-
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
But I think that this discussion is proving my point and the article's point, right? The people seeing Linux as hard are coming FROM Windows, right? But if I get Linux for my sister in law who barely uses a computer she says it "just works and is so much better than what she had." That's the entire point, that people with Windows experience perceive issues with Linux that those without the Windows experience tend not to have issues with.
That's not a Linux thing, though.
That means you are giving your sister in law an appliance. Really, a web browsing and email appliance. A stripped down piece of hardware with basic components and minimal functionality, that's pretty much restricted. That's why it "just works".
You can do that with anything, not just Linux.
Except doing the exact same thing with windows didn't work as well. So you can do it with anything... that's easily like Linux. It wasn't stripped down or special, it was a full Ubuntu OS. If a normal Windows desktop is an appliance, then... okay. But that's a weird way to think of it.
In your example, what made the computer unusable? What was the issue? Why did Windows not work, but Ubuntu did?
Because Windows was hard, required more maintenance that they didn't understand, drivers were flaky or required more knowledge - they couldn't just plug things in and know that they would work like on Linux. Wasn't as extreme as my wife's case where the Windows machine was actively unstable and Linux has been rock solid. it was more subtle. but the point was that it was an instant "totally easy to use", from the moment go. No issues at all.
-
My gaming rig constantly has issues with drivers. Drives me a bit nuts for what I spent on the hardware.
But for gaming I'll make due.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
My gaming rig constantly has issues with drivers. Drives me a bit nuts for what I spent on the hardware.
But for gaming I'll make due.
For Windows or Linux or both?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
You keep saying that Linux won't work, but for the people who aren't Windows users, they seem to find that it does work - really well.
There's a term for that, can't think of it at the moment.
It's demographics or something. You're taking a survey of a group of people for the wrong reasons, getting results exactly you'd expect... but it's the wrong group of people you are surveying. You need an equal mix. You can't just take all the non-Windows users and form a real opinion based on their results.
For example, non-Windows users will find Linux to just work. Just like you'll find non-Linux users to find Windows to just work.
Man I really wish I could think of this concept right now... it's after midnight for me
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@DustinB3403 said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
My gaming rig constantly has issues with drivers. Drives me a bit nuts for what I spent on the hardware.
But for gaming I'll make due.
For Windows or Linux or both?
Gaming = Windows
Didn't we have this conversation before?
-
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
You keep saying that Linux won't work, but for the people who aren't Windows users, they seem to find that it does work - really well.
There's a term for that, can't think of it at the moment.
It's demographics or something. You're taking a survey of a group of people for the wrong reasons, getting results exactly you'd expect... but it's the wrong group of people you are surveying. You need an equal mix. You can't just take all the non-Windows users and form a real opinion based on their results.
For example, non-Windows users will find Linux to just work. Just like you'll find non-Linux users to find Windows to just work.
Man I really wish I could think of this concept right now... it's after midnight for me
Well the point of the article is that there is specifically a difficulty in using Linux for people coming from Windows. It's not unexpected, if you really think about it. Any time you have a group that has trained on something they come to expect that behaviour.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@DustinB3403 said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
My gaming rig constantly has issues with drivers. Drives me a bit nuts for what I spent on the hardware.
But for gaming I'll make due.
For Windows or Linux or both?
Gaming = Windows
Didn't we have this conversation before?
I thought that you might have added linux too, didn't you mention that at some point?
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@Tim_G said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
But I think that this discussion is proving my point and the article's point, right? The people seeing Linux as hard are coming FROM Windows, right? But if I get Linux for my sister in law who barely uses a computer she says it "just works and is so much better than what she had." That's the entire point, that people with Windows experience perceive issues with Linux that those without the Windows experience tend not to have issues with.
That's not a Linux thing, though.
That means you are giving your sister in law an appliance. Really, a web browsing and email appliance. A stripped down piece of hardware with basic components and minimal functionality, that's pretty much restricted. That's why it "just works".
You can do that with anything, not just Linux.
Except doing the exact same thing with windows didn't work as well. So you can do it with anything... that's easily like Linux. It wasn't stripped down or special, it was a full Ubuntu OS. If a normal Windows desktop is an appliance, then... okay. But that's a weird way to think of it.
In your example, what made the computer unusable? What was the issue? Why did Windows not work, but Ubuntu did?
Because Windows was hard, required more maintenance that they didn't understand, drivers were flaky or required more knowledge - they couldn't just plug things in and know that they would work like on Linux. Wasn't as extreme as my wife's case where the Windows machine was actively unstable and Linux has been rock solid. it was more subtle. but the point was that it was an instant "totally easy to use", from the moment go. No issues at all.
It all depends on the use case, hardware, and software being used.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@DustinB3403 said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@scottalanmiller said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
@DustinB3403 said in Why Linux is Hard for Windows Users but Easy for Newbies:
My gaming rig constantly has issues with drivers. Drives me a bit nuts for what I spent on the hardware.
But for gaming I'll make due.
For Windows or Linux or both?
Gaming = Windows
Didn't we have this conversation before?
I thought that you might have added linux too, didn't you mention that at some point?
Only when you couldn't get anything but Ubuntu on your rog.
I created a live boot USB and was operational in seconds.
-
The point of people coming from Windows to Linux, though is that using Windows actively makes using Linux, according to the article, actually harder than not having the experience at all. As in someone with effectively no computer experience will often fare better than someone with loads of Windows specific experience. Because the behaviours are so radically different, it makes people look for and/or create problems where none necessarily exist on their own or when used in a more intuitive way.
