ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    New Uniquiti SIP Phones

    IT Discussion
    android sip ubiquiti voip
    7
    47
    10.3k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • scottalanmillerS
      scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      Did anyone catch that since this is Android.... That that means this is the first Pertino enabled desk phone?

      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • JaredBuschJ
        JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
        last edited by

        @scottalanmiller said:

        Did anyone catch that since this is Android.... That that means this is the first Pertino enabled desk phone?

        Thought about that, but will depend on how locked down the android part is.

        I want it really locked down hard though because I do not want users to be able to add their own play store accounts to their desk phone.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller
          last edited by

          They are advertising that Android is open so you can put whatever on it.

          Hence people complaining about Angry Birds.

          JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • JaredBuschJ
            JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said:

            They are advertising that Android is open so you can put whatever on it.

            Hence people complaining about Angry Birds.

            That sucks. It means we will be required to use 3rd party tools to lock it down.

            I mean I want it open so that management can choose what should be on there. But I wish they would include a method to then lock it down.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • JaredBuschJ
              JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
              last edited by JaredBusch

              @scottalanmiller said:

              Their main headline item on their site says that the SDN integrates with a PBX. Those features can be external to a PBX. Some PBX vendors don't have vmail, for example.

              They stated that the PHONE will work with Asterisk (and likely any other SIP based PBX).

              The SDN though is a PBX in and of itself.

              ubntsdn

              scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • scottalanmillerS
                scottalanmiller
                last edited by

                I'm not sure. Maybe the controller allows for locking it down.

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • JaredBuschJ
                  JaredBusch
                  last edited by

                  edited the picture to add a second circle.

                  Unless this thing is going to provide unheard of (in the SMB space) 3rd party access to an Asterisk PBX, then it will be running a PBX itself.

                  scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • scottalanmillerS
                    scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                    last edited by

                    @JaredBusch said:

                    @scottalanmiller said:

                    Their main headline item on their site says that the SDN integrates with a PBX. Those features can be external to a PBX. Some PBX vendors don't have vmail, for example.

                    They stated that the PHONE will work with Asterisk (and likely any other SIP based PBX).

                    The SDN though is a PBX in and of itself.

                    ubntsdn

                    Where did they state that the controller is a PBX? I've found nothing suggesting that it does call switching.

                    The SDN is the network. It stands for Software Defined Netwotk. Like Pertino is.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • scottalanmillerS
                      scottalanmiller @JaredBusch
                      last edited by

                      @JaredBusch what do you mean? Everything I've seen from them including that picture supports the no PBX functionality theory. It doesn't deny the PBX functionality but nothing has suggested that it exists either.

                      The VoIP port is a VLAN with preconfigured QoS. They state that.

                      JaredBuschJ 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @scottalanmiller
                        last edited by

                        @scottalanmiller said:

                        @JaredBusch what do you mean? Everything I've seen from them including that picture supports the no PBX functionality theory. It doesn't deny the PBX functionality but nothing has suggested that it exists either.

                        The VoIP port is a VLAN with preconfigured QoS. They state that.

                        I am reading more now. Being out all day yesterday has put me too far behind on this.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • scottalanmillerS
                          scottalanmiller
                          last edited by

                          We've been trying to get a handle on it to be ready for release day. I'm hoping to quickly get hands on with this gear.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • JaredBuschJ
                            JaredBusch
                            last edited by

                            Just read the PDF Quick start guide for the UniFi Security Gateway. That VoIP port is noted as disabled and reserved for future use.

                            http://dl.ubnt.com/guides/UniFi/USG_QSG.pdf

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • scottalanmillerS
                              scottalanmiller
                              last edited by

                              That's very weird. They other material suggested that they were ready to use it as a VLAN to handle controlled QoS for the SIP traffic. I wonder if that document just has that like that because it is ahead of the SIP phones release?

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • gjacobseG
                                gjacobse
                                last edited by

                                I'm curious about it - but i don't have a PBX to plug it into... I have users in 9 counties and we are expanding one of our current offices... so this could be a really nice option to go with. Just wonder how it would fit..

                                scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • scottalanmillerS
                                  scottalanmiller @gjacobse
                                  last edited by

                                  @g.jacobse no phone is useful without a PBX. How are you functioning without a PBX today? Are you paying for a 1960s Key System from the phone company?

                                  gjacobseG 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • ?
                                    A Former User
                                    last edited by

                                    You could go with a hosted PBX or Asterisk

                                    scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • ?
                                      A Former User
                                      last edited by

                                      many of us here could set you up with a hosted, managed on site, or configured onsite unmanaged pbx if you're interested, hawla.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • scottalanmillerS
                                        scottalanmiller @A Former User
                                        last edited by

                                        @thecreativeone91 which is what we would often recommend, but even an onsite PBX is better than nothing.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                        • gjacobseG
                                          gjacobse @scottalanmiller
                                          last edited by

                                          @scottalanmiller said:

                                          @g.jacobse no phone is useful without a PBX. How are you functioning without a PBX today? Are you paying for a 1960s Key System from the phone company?

                                          Uhm yea - about that,...We have a onsite Nortel NorStar system at the main office,.. but I'm pretty sure it is otherwise POTS.... as it 90% of all of our remote sites. It was this way when I started last year - but I fully plan to move us into the modern world...

                                          scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • scottalanmillerS
                                            scottalanmiller @gjacobse
                                            last edited by

                                            @g.jacobse said:

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            @g.jacobse no phone is useful without a PBX. How are you functioning without a PBX today? Are you paying for a 1960s Key System from the phone company?

                                            Uhm yea - about that,...We have a onsite Nortel NorStar system at the main office,.. but I'm pretty sure it is otherwise POTS.... as it 90% of all of our remote sites. It was this way when I started last year - but I fully plan to move us into the modern world...

                                            Nortel made PBXs, long ago. That's just an old PBX.

                                            POTS is the outside lines, doesn't refer to the inside ones. At a minimum that's almost certainly a digital (not IP) phone system. Pretty rough, though.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 3
                                            • 2 / 3
                                            • First post
                                              Last post