@JaredBusch What size instance did you use? Please remember that Postcards requires 2GB of Ram (we recommend 4).
Posts made by Skyetel
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
Let’s table this till next week. I’ll have one of our other engineers update the install script to be more inclusive for Operating Systems.
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
@JaredBusch said in Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI:
@Skyetel said in Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI:
@JaredBusch yes, he’s legit. Cody is one of our rockstars so be nice
Your nice or mine?
Whichever is nicer
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
@JaredBusch yes, he’s legit. Cody is one of our rockstars so be nice
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
I'll check to see if a non-docker install method is doable.
So the short answer to this question is "no," but we might modify the installation to switch to RHEL's k8s so you can use Centos 8. Our developers live and breathe containers, and trying to get them to go old school is... challenging lol.
However, we are going to be writing a few guides for users to be able to install postcards on cloud platforms like this:
https://www.digitalocean.com/products/kubernetes/ & https://aws.amazon.com/fargate/We're also going to draft some guides that show people how to the HTML source to make changes for themselves (ideally by being able to FTP into the Postcards Server and modify the HTML - but the exact method is up in the air).
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
@JaredBusch said in Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI:
So the CentOS 8 problem and the Fedora 32 problem both stem from this.
This is 100% a docker problem.
So @Skyetel can we get a non-docker install method "supported"
It looks like Red Hat dropped support for Docker altogether:
http://crunchtools.com/why-no-docker/So we need to update our readme to recommend Centos 7 or Debian/Ubuntu.
I'll check to see if a non-docker install method is doable.
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
@JaredBusch said in Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI:
also, how do I submit bug reports in bitbucket? I don't see anything like the normal "issues" in gitlab or github.
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
Okay - it's official. New version is out:
https://skyetel.com/postcards-1-1-now-available/ -
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
@JasGot I don’t believe the install methods have changed. So the existing guides should work.
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
@JasGot It was technically released today - so you should be able to install it and start using it now. We'll be doing the formal announcement on Monday (apparently there is a small known bug that our developers want to fix before we release it).
Feel free to spin one up and try it - but I'd suggest waiting until you get the formal email on Monday before putting it in production. I don't personally know what the bug was.
-
RE: Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI
@scottalanmiller said in Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI:
@JasGot said in Introducing Postcards - Our SMS & MMS UI:
Any updates to this app? Any plans to update it or replace it? It's still VERY VERY basic.
A couple of things I could really use are:
- Import phone numbers and names
- Send "bulk" to the people I've entered.
It's a demo app, not really meant to be used. It's meant to show how to build your own tooling using their API.
Version 1.1 is going to be released in about 2 weeks. It will include:
- Upload Contacts via CSV
- Search - Ability to search through messages & contacts
- Automated image scaling for images that run larger than 1.5Mb
- Giphy Integration - Send Giphys in SMS!
- Send Emojis - Send Emojis!
- Templates - Have pre-set messages that can be sent with a click of a mouse
- Archive Conversations - Ability to close a conversation and hide it from view
- Bulk SMS Sending - Ability to send 1 message to multiple recipients via some kind of Queue. We're calling it announcements
- Auto Replies - Be able to automatically reply to a new message
- Schedule Sending SMS - Ability to deliver an SMS at a pre-set time
- Email Notifications - Ability to notify users that they’ve received an SMS by email using end-user supplied SMTP servers
- Postcards Updater - Add the ability to update from one version of Postcards to the next version
I wouldn't say that it is a "Demo App." We do want people to be able to use it as a solid solution, but it's not our company's focus. If you have some development expertise, you can fork it and expand on it. Otherwise you have to just wait for us to give it some TLC. We are going to try to do twice a year updates on it.
-
RE: Skyetel's 4th Region
Well - it looks like we have to issue an update about this.
Unfortunately, 4.skyetel.com clashes with some systems that do not support numerical values in DNS entries (yes, thats a real thing) and so please use na.skyetel.com instead. We will be sending out an email tomorrow asking everyone to please use na.skyetel.com instead of 4.skyetel.com. Sorry for the headache guys.
-
RE: Skyetel's 4th Region
@JaredBusch said in Skyetel's 4th Region:
@Skyetel said in Skyetel's 4th Region:
It also has TCP support
TLS/SRTP support coming? Or just setting up TCP for those unlucky people that have to use it?
Just for those who have to use TCP.
TLS/SRTP forces us to get into the audio path and we’re not super excited to do that. Upstream PSTN networks don’t support it either.
-
RE: Skyetel's 4th Region
@JaredBusch said in Skyetel's 4th Region:
Also, since 4.skyetel.com has both
A
records andSRV
records, it works perfectly in FreePBX without any extra firewall settings or the need for the match/permit setting in advanced.[jbusch@pbx ~]$ dig 4.skyetel.com @1.1.1.1 ; <<>> DiG 9.9.4-RedHat-9.9.4-74.el7_6.1 <<>> 4.skyetel.com @1.1.1.1 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 17708 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1452 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;4.skyetel.com. IN A ;; ANSWER SECTION: 4.skyetel.com. 229 IN A 52.8.201.128 4.skyetel.com. 229 IN A 52.60.138.31 4.skyetel.com. 229 IN A 52.41.52.34 4.skyetel.com. 229 IN A 50.17.48.216 ;; Query time: 3 msec ;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) ;; WHEN: Thu Apr 23 21:38:56 CDT 2020 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 119
[jbusch@pbx ~]$ dig SRV _sip._udp.4.skyetel.com @1.1.1.1 ; <<>> DiG 9.9.4-RedHat-9.9.4-74.el7_6.1 <<>> SRV _sip._udp.4.skyetel.com @1.1.1.1 ;; global options: +cmd ;; Got answer: ;; ->>HEADER<<- opcode: QUERY, status: NOERROR, id: 28558 ;; flags: qr rd ra; QUERY: 1, ANSWER: 4, AUTHORITY: 0, ADDITIONAL: 1 ;; OPT PSEUDOSECTION: ; EDNS: version: 0, flags:; udp: 1452 ;; QUESTION SECTION: ;_sip._udp.4.skyetel.com. IN SRV ;; ANSWER SECTION: _sip._udp.4.skyetel.com. 269 IN SRV 10 10 5060 ca1.skyetel.com. _sip._udp.4.skyetel.com. 269 IN SRV 10 10 5060 va1.skyetel.com. _sip._udp.4.skyetel.com. 269 IN SRV 10 10 5060 or1.skyetel.com. _sip._udp.4.skyetel.com. 269 IN SRV 10 10 5060 eh.skyetel.com. ;; Query time: 3 msec ;; SERVER: 1.1.1.1#53(1.1.1.1) ;; WHEN: Thu Apr 23 21:39:03 CDT 2020 ;; MSG SIZE rcvd: 214
It also has TCP support
-
RE: Skyetel's 4th Region
@JaredBusch said in Skyetel's 4th Region:
@Skyetel how new is 4.skyetel.com my PBX doesn't see the A record now.
So my initial test was valid, but seems DNS is not solid yet or something.
This was our mistake - we reset our DNS settings for 4.skyetel.com in preparation for tomorrow mornings announcement. Should be solid now that it’s been deployed to our production settings on Cloudflare. (It needed TCP support)
-
Skyetel's 4th Region
Hey Guys,
I'm giving you all first notice about this since a lot of you guys have helped us with bugs and provided us with other feedback.
We are going to be adding our 4th Region to our routing tables in June. Most of you guys are already good to go, but for those of you who aren't, please have a quick look at this: https://support.skyetel.com/hc/en-us/articles/360046703354-Skyetel-s-4th-Region
Would you guys be willing to test na.skyetel.com with your PBXs to verify that they are indeed routing outbound calls to all 4 of our IPs?
Thanks!
(edit - updated with na.skyetel.com)