I use tags for browsing categories, and I use searches for finding something specific.

When you go in to a library wanting a sci-fi book, you go to the sci-fi section, or even look for an aliens area (tags). And when you are looking for something specific, such as Terminator, you will search for it... or search more specifically (searches).

That's how I use and think of tags, whether its right or wrong I don't care. It works well for me that way.

May be a bad example I don't know, hopefully my point came across correctly.

Well, I can't view their site because I use an ad blocker. I despise that crap. Got another article?

Trying to study without checking ML...

PowerShell Empire has some good modules that will do all that
Check out BloodHound.

Well then happy birthday ML! I'm a more recent joiner too, didn't know of ML existence soon enough!

PowerShell tag?

Sounds like the typical workings of offline folders. Nothing you can really do about it.

Have you considered testing Work Folders? I think it requires 2012, but may be worth an evaluation.

I think this may be helpful: https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/filecab/2015/09/04/comparing-work-folders-and-offline-files/

I found this:

I'm still in the process of doing a Data audit, which includes:

• Production data totals (non-compressed, non-deduped)
• Data clean-up plan (what can go, duplicates, old and forgotten dupes, unneeded stuff)
• Data consumption rate (how fast is actual production data growing)

Rough estimate at this point is between 10 and 15 TB total. Estimated to be able to down it to under 8 TB raw. (may be wishful thinking, though)

EDIT: in addition to above storage:

• Office 365 email storage: 1.5 TB
• OneDrive: 125 GB

@JaredBusch said in CentOS 7 VM on Hyper-V losing DHCP assigned address:

Look what I found..

grep clock /var/log/messages*
/var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource
/var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: rtc_cmos 00:00: setting system clock to 2017-02-28 13:17:53 UTC (1488287873)
/var/log/messages-20170213:Feb 28 07:17:53 jaredweb kernel: Switched to clocksource hyperv_clocksource_tsc_page

How in the fuck do I fix this?

Time sync from the host has never been enabled. I realize it always gets it at boot and I did reboot last night because I updated the Hyper-V host.

The host also has the correct time.

C:\>time /t
04:03 PM

C:\>date /t
Mon 02/13/2017

C:\Users\bnaadmin>

Can you remind me again why you will not or can not use the Hypervisor time? Does the time match the host if you actually enable the "Time Synchronization" service?

Do you have an offline root CA or is do you just have a single CA that does it all: certificate issuing, CDP, etc.?

@Grey said in Certificate Authority Quagmire:

@Tim_G said in Certificate Authority Quagmire:

@Grey said in Certificate Authority Quagmire:

@Tim_G said in Certificate Authority Quagmire:

On the DC, can't you request another one from your CA via certlm.msc?

The DC is the CA.

Not good... But I guess it is what it is. So let's just focus on fixing it.

Is starting over an option?

If not...
How is your pki set up? How many tiers? From where did you import the wrongly named cert?

No. Unsure; I inherited this and I'm hazy on CAs. A previous DC was in use and is decommissioned, but the old cert was imported to keep some cisco products from complaining.

You still need to renew the certificate. You can do it in CA management.

@Grey said in Certificate Authority Quagmire:

@Tim_G said in Certificate Authority Quagmire:

On the DC, can't you request another one from your CA via certlm.msc?

The DC is the CA.

Not good... But I guess it is what it is. So let's just focus on fixing it.

Is starting over an option?

If not...
How is your pki set up? How many tiers? From where did you import the wrongly named cert?

If I only limit myself to my 8-10 hours at work, focusing only on work, Monday to Friday, I wouldn't know anything! Exaggerating a little, but you get my point. If you want to maintain a career in IT you need to live and breathe it... I has to be a passion imho.

IT doesn't cease to exist because you are not at work!

Or, when I'm at home or out with the family, it's just way too easy to check your notifications or unread posts on your cell phone. Literally takes only as long as it does to unlock phone, open browser, refresh page... 5-10 seconds?

I like to keep up with things, and my profession, learning in the process. ML tracking helps with that. I read all threads. Just because I don't reply to most of them doesn't mean im not reading and learning through them. I'm sure I speak for others as well!

@scottalanmiller said in Basic Linux Interview questions from ML:

Putty is just a Windows tool for connecting to SSH. Linux will have questions about working from the command line, but I would not expect questions about a purely Windows connection tool.

I've used Putty for Telnet. But I use it even more for Serial connections for initial setups of switches.

But yeah, main usage is SSH in Windows.

On the DC, can't you request another one from your CA via certlm.msc?

Looks like Monoprice has a few options:

https://www.monoprice.com/search/index?keyword=+stand+desk

I may have been getting interested in something like this myself the past few weeks. I don't know, glad I came across this thread. Gonna bookmark it for possible future needs.

Have you had a chance to replace the certificate yet?

@scottalanmiller said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

@Dashrender said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

@DustinB3403 said in Shadow Protect SPX vs Veeam:

This isn't a topic of being forced to learn on my own time or not. This was a question of why do people choose Veeam over spx...

What is the price difference? Until the agents are completely out there. SPC offers the ability to backup physical or virtual servers. Veeam was (centrally) virtual only.

Was, but they've had the decentalized agents out for a bit just prepping them for addition to the central control.

The new Veeam Windows and Linux agents are separate products and licensing. They are new and in beta. I would never put a production environment on beta backup software. It's too new. Id rather go with a vendor who's already both physical and virtual in the same product naturally, if you know what I mean