Posts made by markjcrane

@scottalanmiller I haven't specifically checked on international calling rates for them but I have used them call internationally. They don't currently offer DIDs outside of North America.

@StuartJordan Next time you decide to spin it up contact me and I will help you with the NAT issue. I have a little time this week. Next week I'm teaching FusionPBX November Admin training as show at www.fusionpbx.com. So if not this week I'll have more time after the training is over.

@markjcrane said in Setting up FusionPBX:

Debian 9

Thought I should give an update.

FreeSWITCH 1.8 officially supports Debian 9. FusionPBX install script shown on the downloads page for FusionPBX website will install Debian 9 (stretch). Also a few days ago I spent some time helping someone get it working on Raspberry Pi Raspbian based on Debian 9 stretch. We ran the FusionPBX install script will work fine for Raspberry Pi 3 Model b.

@JaredBusch We are continually improving FusionPBX current master branch has 5 new import tools to add data faster. I think it will help a lot of people save time migrating. A lot of improvements to the provisioning system. GS Wave QR code instant provisioning tool. Messages feature for SMS and more... Will keep polishing, fixing bugs and adding relevant features.

@JaredBusch

Actually I accidentally posted it to this thread it was meant for this one https://mangolassi.it/topic/18265/voip-provider-skyetel

Best thing to do is find people that have used Skyetel and talk to them or at least read some reviews of what they have said.

Google search: Skyetel look on the right and you will see 27 reviews at this moment all 5 stars. If you read the reviews you will see the customers of Skyetel are really happy. Part of that happiness comes from good customer service and from the prices that have saved a lot of people money. I know some of the people that gave the reviews... at least 25% of them use FusionPBX.

@bigbear said in FusionPBX benefits:

I don’t think dns srv records and the current sync setup you are describing compares on any level to opensips.

No but they do provide a level of load balancing. Can you do more with openSIPS or Kamailio definitely.

No ones bashing fusion, were just getting this commercial here today out of the blue and I don’t know what’s behind it.

I did not start the post. I'm simply responding to the conversation that is here.

@jaredbusch English is not babak's native language.

@bigbear almost everything listed is native to freeswitch.

FreeSWITCH doesn't have hot desking, device provisioning, operator panel, and all the other features that it does have are configured with XML. What FreeSWITCH has is a good tool box to make it possible to make all of those features.

@bigbear Also fusion doesn’t load balance servers, it’s just a failover BDR, where opensips and Kamailio offer true redundancy.

Load balancing is literally distributing the load and this can be done using multiple tools including but not limited to OpenSIPs and Kamailio but because FusionPBX is domain based multi-tenant system that usually has multiple domains and therefore load can also be distributed with DNS SRV, Smart DNS, multiple outbound proxies and more.

Debian 9 install.
Had someone look at the install on Debian 9.
In the install script debian/resource/config.sh set php_version=7

wget http://http.us.debian.org/debian/pool/main/o/openssl/libssl1.0.0_1.0.1t-1+deb8u6_amd64.deb
apt install ./libssl1.0.0_1.0.1t-1+deb8u6_amd64.deb

With this dependency change the FreeSWITCH package install should work.
Not a perfect solution however as the repo is still Jessie.

@scottalanmiller
Dependency changes have delayed the FreeSWITCH package release for Debian 9. FreeSWITCH development is actively developed. But open source does sometimes require some patience.

Announcements for FreeSWITCH will be given at ClueCon which is next week Keynote is on Tuesday morning. ClueCon is an annual open source telephony event in Chicago. Anthony is the keynote speaker and will be speaking on Tuesday morning. Here is the schedule https://www.cluecon.com/schedule.html. FreeSWITCH project is certainly alive and actively moving forward.

@black3dynamite It's failing because Debian 9 was just released and FreeSWITCH doesn't have a package repo for Debian 9 'stretch' yet. ClueCon is next week maybe they will share some information on it then.

@jaredbusch You need Debian 8 currently. You can get it from here.
 https://cdimage.debian.org/cdimage/archive/

@jaredbusch Sorry most effort has gone into Debian then FreeBSD and CentOS script was added by another developer based on the Debian script I'll give it another couple test installs. I haven't tried it on Fedora.

As far as many comments about redundancy and not all eggs in one basket. Just need to have a backup system that runs a nightly backup and restore script to another server or two. Setting up a server cluster is also possible for both systems.

@jaredbusch said in Replacing FreePBX with FusionPBX:

But the point here is to talk about systems without bias. Please do not turn this into a bashing conversation.

The point was not to bash FreePBX or Asterisk it was fun for the year that I used them. I credit both for getting me started in open source telephony. Before that I was introduced to VoIP by Cisco Call Manager, and Microsoft Net Meeting.

There were points brought up about differences and this is one of them or at least used to be. Haven't installed FreePBX for several years so it may or may not be valid now. Which is why I asked someone to give it a try...

Make changes int FreePBX and when you hit apply watch the CPU with HTOP or top.
Its been some years since I've been on FreePBX but last time I did that it had very high CPU usage enough to interrupt the call for a minute or two. The system only had 10 extensions.

I would be curious about someone trying this test on current FreePBX systems. To see if this is still happening.

Try the same test on FusionPBX and you are not going to see a large CPU spike. Even if you had 5000 extensions or more.

FusionPBX uses the same terminology as FreeSWITCH for Gateways (trunks) and so this is documented at the following links.

Twilio
https://www.twilio.com/blog/2013/03/trying-out-the-twilio-sip-noun-using-freeswitch.html

Flowroute
https://freeswitch.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=2883692

Many providers
https://freeswitch.org/confluence/display/FREESWITCH/Providers+ITSPs

@markjcrane With this fail2ban rule a bot or a hacker tries to brute force and register to the IP address of the server they are banned on the first attempt.