@wirestyle22 said in Feedback on Resume:
@jackcpickup said in Feedback on Resume:
@wirestyle22 said in Feedback on Resume:
@jackcpickup said in Feedback on Resume:
@wirestyle22 said in Feedback on Resume:
@jackcpickup said in Feedback on Resume:
@coliver said in Feedback on Resume:
@breffni-potter said in Feedback on Resume:
So your job title was desktop support
And 4 different companies called you IT generalist? Sounds made up.We've had this argument on here a few times. What does it matter what the company calls you? 90% of the time those title mean literally nothing and often don't apply to the job you actually did. IT Generalist is the correct descriptor for what @wirestyle22 did at those positions.
Because that's what recruiters would be looking at? They don't know the differences or not actual differences, so you're shooting yourself in the foot a bit by not using it for their sake.
I am not shooting myself in the foot by accurately describing my skill set and experience. I'd be shooting myself in the foot if I didn't do this though.
I'm only replying to that person's comment about job title. Its intended audience will be looking at job titles no matter if we as IT people recognise them the same. Continue accurately describing your skillset as you have, job title doesn't do that
Right but my point is that my job titles, although they are my "true" titles are not accurate and will give them the impression I am looking for a job I am not while also highlighting a skillset I don't have.
They may accurate for somebody actually looking for that job title, because they don't really get the difference. Whereas IT Generalist is a bit obscure as a title and would maybe have a higher chance of being ignored as they sift through piles of CVs.
Well I did say IT Generalist is a filler title currently, but it is in fact accurate to what I am doing
Apologies for missing that, as I said my original comment was a reply to someone else.