@scottalanmiller said in SPAM Filtering with Zimbra:
@StuartJordan said in SPAM Filtering with Zimbra:
Don't know if you want to try these: https://www.mxguarddog.com/
think it's only $0.25 per mailbox per month....I'd looked at them and it was not per mailbox, but by per alias. So the actual cost for us was more than O365 or Gmail!
where are you seeing that scott?
https://www.mxguarddog.com/pricing/
I have taken my Samsung Galaxy Tab S2 before and logged into a desktop from the tablet. A few people have been impressed by that. Light to carry to a meeting and can use in the meeting as well. I always have a company background with logo on the desktop just to make it visually appealing as well.
@dbeato said in SPAM Filtering with Zimbra:
@StuartJordan said in SPAM Filtering with Zimbra:
Don't know if you want to try these: https://www.mxguarddog.com/
think it's only $0.25 per mailbox per month....For my personal test, I just started using them. But other than that we use Barracuda CLoud and Mimecast on other servers that are on production.
How are you finding them? I have used Mimecast in the past, filtering is really good. Obviously more costly though.
Make sure you choose the right storage method for VDI if you are doing this yourself, otherwise you will have a right shit storm. You will save money and resources if you can use session based desktops rather than VDI based. there are only specific cases when you need VDI desktops I find. If you have session based desktops you can also have 2 sessions hosts and if you spec them properly you can put one in maintenance mode for updates, software installs etc and shift everyone else on to the other server temporary.
Don't know if you want to try these: https://www.mxguarddog.com/
think it's only $0.25 per mailbox per month....
Big Thumbs up on that Dbeato, first guide on here for Zpush I believe.
I know Nextcloud documents can be password protected, you could fire up a VM and install Nextcloud.
https://nextcloud.com/
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
@StuartJordan said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
...it would still probably be less than windows though because you need to elevate privileges on Linux and we all know most people run with admin privileges on windows.
That's not related to Linux vs. NTKernel (the Windows Kernel.) They are essentially identical there. You are seeing "common approaches from the userbase" and perceiving that behaviour as being caused by the kernel code, but it is not.
Run Windows uses on a Linux-based OS and they will behave the same as they always did. Put Linux-based OS users on Windows and they are secure. It's the userbase, not the product, that has that effect.
Windows is just as much "need elevated privileges to run" as any highly secure Linux distro, but Windows end users are way more likely to work around that, and be accepting of third party products that demand it.
Port the Windows desktop to Linux, literally nothing will change, because those users will come along with it.
I suppose I was meaning the userbase more then the actual kernel in that statement.
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
@StuartJordan said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
@NerdyDad said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
@StuartJordan But by rewriting all of their software packages...
Why would they do that? All they need is a Windows API on top of Linux, the same way they do with a Linux API on top of Windows already. This is stuff that they do every day and are very good at. Reversing it is no harder than doing it the way that they do it now.
True, I think it would be a good move for them, I don't think they see Windows as their main bread a butter anymore, they have even reduced the windows team. Their main focus seems to be Azure these days.
Moving to a unified kernel would add some risk that the "entire" world moved to just one kernel. There are reasons that we, as consumers, don't want that. From a Microsoft perspective, the cost savings would be enormous. It's amazing that they pay to build their own kernels when there is so little value in the kernel for the past couple of decades.
And they still don't run, and never once have, a kernel that they made themselves. The one that they use now is taken from OS/2 and was jointed developed with IBM in the 1980s.
I wonder how much of that original code is still in the Kernel?
I have to agree that Linux would have a bigger attack area if everyone moved over to using it. We would probably see some unsavoury malware and Viruses created, it would still probably be less than windows though because you need to elevate privileges on Linux and we all know most people run with admin privileges on windows.
@scottalanmiller said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
@NerdyDad said in Microsoft to Launch Linux Version of Sysinternals:
@StuartJordan But by rewriting all of their software packages...
Why would they do that? All they need is a Windows API on top of Linux, the same way they do with a Linux API on top of Windows already. This is stuff that they do every day and are very good at. Reversing it is no harder than doing it the way that they do it now.
True, I think it would be a good move for them, I don't think they see Windows as their main bread a butter anymore, they have even reduced the windows team. Their main focus seems to be Azure these days.
It makes me wonder how far Microsoft are willing to go down the route of creating their own distribution, would be very beneficial and save costs if they didn't have to manage their own kernel anymore. I'm sure they could make their distribution compatible with windows applications as well.
@nadnerB sounds like something ain't right with that, I've always had good speeds downloading.
Perhaps head over and give elementary a whirl.
Defiantly was a good project started by Mozilla, Cisco and others. Helped and stopped companies taking advantage and charging stupid prices on wildcard certs as well.
An interesting topic, we could go on from this by recommending how to run the individual services correctly outside of the UTM device. IDS/IPS, DPI. Etc. That would be a good topic as well.
@scottalanmiller ah gotcha, wasn't that a really popular board game in the 90s if I memory serves me correctly?
Good guide, NodeBB is a nice product.
How many bets how long it will take for them to use the new coc against him.