ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    What Is New in RHEL 6.8

    News
    linux rhel rhel 6.8 centos centos 6.8 xfs softpedia phoronix
    3
    5
    1.8k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • mlnewsM
      mlnews
      last edited by

      Red Hat's RHEL 6.8, the latest update for the older but still supported RHEL 6 tree, is now out and available to customers (CentOS packages would be expected any day.) New features include expanding XFS file sizes to 300TB and a move from OpenSwan to LibreSwan for VPN libraries and addition of the dmstats tool.

      Phoronix covers the little mentioned fact that BtrFS support has been deprecated in the RHEL 6 family with this update (but has clarified that this does not impact RHEL 7.)

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • travisdh1T
        travisdh1
        last edited by

        BtrFS support depreciated? Odd. Great, now I have to go read that as well 😛

        scottalanmillerS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • scottalanmillerS
          scottalanmiller @travisdh1
          last edited by

          @travisdh1 said in What Is New in RHEL 6.8:

          BtrFS support depreciated? Odd. Great, now I have to go read that as well 😛

          Yeah, Phoronix was pretty surprised by that. But it is not being removed in RHEL 7 so...

          travisdh1T 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
          • travisdh1T
            travisdh1 @scottalanmiller
            last edited by

            @scottalanmiller said in What Is New in RHEL 6.8:

            @travisdh1 said in What Is New in RHEL 6.8:

            BtrFS support depreciated? Odd. Great, now I have to go read that as well 😛

            Yeah, Phoronix was pretty surprised by that. But it is not being removed in RHEL 7 so...

            Which leads to wondering how it can be depreciated in 6, but still available in 7? I take it that version 6 and 7 are two completely different entities then? That'd be the only thing that makes any sort of sense at all to me with Red Hat's definition of depreciated that Phoronix quoted.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • scottalanmillerS
              scottalanmiller
              last edited by

              Who knows, everyone is pretty confused by this one.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • 1 / 1
              • First post
                Last post