Net Neutrality - What a difference 7 years makes
-
http://fusion.net/leadership/story/obama-net-neutrality-campaign-video-surfaces-643645
Read the article, watch the video response (man I remember seeing this a while back too.....) but something tells me that some really don't have a handle on just how bad the new normal for the Internet is going to get now that Net Neutrality is pretty much done.
-
@Bill-Kindle said:
http://fusion.net/leadership/story/obama-net-neutrality-campaign-video-surfaces-643645
Read the article, watch the video response (man I remember seeing this a while back too.....) but something tells me that some really don't have a handle on just how bad the new normal for the Internet is going to get now that Net Neutrality is pretty much done.
Big Brother NSA rules the country and Net Neutrality is dead.... Just like American hegemony.
Maybe it is for the best. Really screw up and end it rather than limping along. Just hand global domination back to the EU and give up.
-
@scottalanmiller It's really going to be interesting to see who gets what priority on traffic.
-
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller It's really going to be interesting to see who gets what priority on traffic.
If by interesting you mean depressing.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller It's really going to be interesting to see who gets what priority on traffic.
If by interesting you mean depressing.
-
Well now that Google and company are stepping back in to the fight, I don't think it is over yet.
-
Hopefully. The real answer is.... Time to move.
-
@scottalanmiller I've always found it sad that we live in America, it's 2014, and yet most homes in the US do not have at minimum a fiber link to their home. We just don't really build infrastructure anymore.
-
That's because we let private companies own the public's infrastructure.
-
@scottalanmiller Well if the government owned it entirely, it would give them less barriers to spy on citizens.
-
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller Well if the government owned it entirely, it would give them less barriers to spy on citizens.
We don't want them owning it, just regulating it better.
-
@Nic said:
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller Well if the government owned it entirely, it would give them less barriers to spy on citizens.
We don't want them owning it, just regulating it better.
No regulation and I"ll be happy
-
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller Well if the government owned it entirely, it would give them less barriers to spy on citizens.
Are there any barriers now?
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller Well if the government owned it entirely, it would give them less barriers to spy on citizens.
Are there any barriers now?
Only paper ones.
-
@RAM. said:
@Nic said:
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller Well if the government owned it entirely, it would give them less barriers to spy on citizens.
We don't want them owning it, just regulating it better.
No regulation and I"ll be happy
That's what we have now.
-
-
@scottalanmiller but but butt, he had no idea
I've never seen a President use so much plausible deniability as this guy has. It's almost like he's unaware of everything. /RANT
-
@Bill-Kindle said:
@scottalanmiller but but butt, he had no idea
I've never seen a President use so much plausible deniability as this guy has. It's almost like he's unaware of everything. /RANT
He doesn't care and why should he? He has been on cruise control the last 3 years. He is set for life
-
