HTML help
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@IRJ said:
<img border=0 width=300 height=120 id="Picture_x0020_1" src="www.kscfcu.org/home/images/stories/fruit/launchfcu_gb-chrome_300x120.jpg" alt="Launch_email_sig_logo">
Can someone please tell me what is wrong with that code?
You need a slash at the end. <img /> is one of those weird markups that is singular and not a pair like <html></html> so you need the trailing slash.
Likely not causing the issue, but AJ is correct that for proper markup that is needed.
-
Each attribute should be in quotes. Again, should not be the issue, but for proper markup, it is best to do.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@IRJ said:
<img border=0 width=300 height=120 id="Picture_x0020_1" src="www.kscfcu.org/home/images/stories/fruit/launchfcu_gb-chrome_300x120.jpg" alt="Launch_email_sig_logo">
Can someone please tell me what is wrong with that code?
You need a slash at the end. <img /> is one of those weird markups that is singular and not a pair like <html></html> so you need the trailing slash.
Likely not causing the issue, but AJ is correct that for proper markup that is needed.
Yeah I am still getting the Linked image cannot be displayed. The URL works. I am not sure why it isnt displaying the image.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@thanksajdotcom said:
@IRJ said:
<img border=0 width=300 height=120 id="Picture_x0020_1" src="www.kscfcu.org/home/images/stories/fruit/launchfcu_gb-chrome_300x120.jpg" alt="Launch_email_sig_logo">
Can someone please tell me what is wrong with that code?
You need a slash at the end. <img /> is one of those weird markups that is singular and not a pair like <html></html> so you need the trailing slash.
Likely not causing the issue, but AJ is correct that for proper markup that is needed.
I've seen it work without it but it can't hurt. Depends on how picky the program wants to be.
-
Maybe your issue is with the context of this tag and not the tag itself.
-
did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.
that's a possibility
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.
testing now....
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
did you try mine? you need http:// for it to be complaint.
Thanks!
-
I don't think anyone realized the logo wasn't showing up for 5 minutes
-
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
-
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
NTG has a client that has a program that does that as well.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
NTG has a client that has a program that does that as well.
I don't remember the name of the utility though. It's a licensed utility though...
-
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.
-
@thanksajdotcom said:
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
NTG has a client that has a program that does that as well.
I did mine via HTML as a rule in Exchange. Once you populate everything in AD, it works great.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.
You can't tell Management that, though.
-
@thecreativeone91 said:
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.
The reason I hate it is that when you send emails to open tickets in any system, it attaches the image from every email sent as an attachment to the case...UGH!
-
I tried my best to implement text signatures, but that didn't fly.
-
@IRJ said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.
You can't tell Management that, though.
I do. It turns off potential customers. Lots of people (in my limited experience) find that stuff rude because it means you aren't being considerate of the recipient and aren't actually thinking about what you are doing. Rarely do they work and mostly look bad anyway. Lots of negatives, very little potential positive.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
@IRJ said:
@thecreativeone91 said:
@IRJ said:
P.S. Our standardized email signature has been great. Its so nice to make changes on the server for everyone at once. We even have everyone's Title, email address, extension, fax, etc. generated from AD.
I honestly hate images in signatures. Wastes space. even more so if someone prints it.
You can't tell Management that, though.
I do. It turns off potential customers. Lots of people (in my limited experience) find that stuff rude because it means you aren't being considerate of the recipient and aren't actually thinking about what you are doing. Rarely do they work and mostly look bad anyway. Lots of negatives, very little potential positive.
I agree. I tried to fight that battle, but was quickly turned away and told to use images. Especially when mobile emails are text only.
