Non-IT News Thread
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
-
I'm not saying anything against him. I consume more caffeine than that. But the quote was BS. You can't say that I'm anti drugs given my coffee consumption.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
-
Go team elephant.
Zimbabwe hunter 'crushed to death by shot elephant'
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-africa-39996592 -
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@travisdh1 What does the history of an agency have to do with the products consumed and sold as food.
Caffeinated drinks are not a controlled or monitored substance. The kid obviously had an issue, consumed to many and died from a bad ticker.
If he had used that illegal, evil, devil weed he'd still be alive. Legal, unregulated drugs kill. Caffeine is waaaaaaaaaaay more dangerous than THC. So are Tylenol, Viagra, and most other over the counter "drugs". This country's laws are so fucked it's not even funny.
-
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
-
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.
If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.
-
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.
If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.
well damn... funny but damn.
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.
If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.
well damn... funny but damn.
Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?
-
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.
If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.
well damn... funny but damn.
Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?
Technically you do... its getting your body to release those chemicals at will . .
-
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.
If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.
well damn... funny but damn.
Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?
Technically you do... its getting your body to release those chemicals at will . .
Maybe you do. Not everyone's brains make all the neurotransmitters they need. I'll take those vials of happy juice now.
-
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@RojoLoco said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
@DustinB3403 said in Non-IT News Thread:
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
So he was "totally not into drugs" but ODd and died. Um...
Against illegal drugs. Caffeine is not a monitored and controlled substance. So yes, the child could have easily been anti-drug "just say no" etc and still been addicted to a legal substance (caffeine).
That's not against drugs. That's against not breaking the law. Which is totally fine, but a very different thing.
You're splitting hairs here.
A person can morally be against the use of drugs, or they can want to "not break the law". But your assumption here is that if drugs weren't illegal they'd be used (and that is a bad assumption).
My assumption is he wasn't against drugs as he took one liberally.
He took an uncontrolled substance liberally.
Eating catfish is a form of a drug, because everything is just a chemical bag in a specific form. Just because one chemical in that chemical bag can be dangerous doesn't mean you are pro drug use.
Caffeine is a drug. Plain and simple. There's nothing more to it. It's a mood enhancer.
And so are all of the chemicals in literally everything.
If we could suck serotonin and dopamine out of water does anyone think we'd bother with anything else.
If I had vials of liquid serotonin and dopamine, I would inject them straight into my eyeball if necessary. That would save a lot of unnecessary steps and calories.
well damn... funny but damn.
Why bother with the stuff that "makes me happy" if I had the happy juice at the ready?
Technically you do... its getting your body to release those chemicals at will . .
Maybe you do. Not everyone's brains make all the neurotransmitters they need. I'll take those vials of happy juice now.
I'll take a few for me, and a few for my wife as well... I won't need mine very often. I'm a happy guy. *smashes computer with baseball bat*.
-
Manchester Arena blast: 19 dead and about 50 hurt
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-manchester-40007886 -
@scottalanmiller up to 22 dead and 59 injured now
-
Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422 -
@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422@scottalanmiller said in Non-IT News Thread:
Sir Roger Moore, James Bond actor, dies aged 89
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-40018422Just saw that... another banging year for iconic people passing on.
