Weight Loss Surgery?
-
@JaredBusch said:
<edit>I walked for the entire 1 hour. I ate my lunch at my desk prior to the lunch break. IN good weather, I walked the parking lot and read on my Sony Librie e-Reader. In bad weather I drove to a nearby mall (5 minutes) and walked 2 laps around it (2 miles) while reading.
How do you manage to walk AND read....
I'm sure if I pushed the sodas away I'd lose what I want.. At 6'2",.. I need to lose a bit..
@thecreativeone91 said:
Running daily and drinking only water is how I keep my weight down. I'm 6' 3" 180 pounds
Running and I have an agreement... I don't. wished I could get it into my head to do it.. I'm hoping the Office change will allow some of that change.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
I'm very hopeful that the change to the European lifestyle - fresh food, eating later, no preservatives or additives, walking everywhere, lots of hills, fresh air - will do something for me as well.
Americans always thought I was unusual for either never eating breakfast or eating something small, and same for dinner/supper, but a slightly larger lunch, and lunch a little late too. In fact on two different occasions I made people angry by saying I don't really eat breakfast or like the traditional English/American breakfast food. It's no wonder people are tired as hell by 10am.
Anyway, I don't have a problem with preservatives in general, unless it's scientifically proven by double blind studies and peer review in a real journal, then I'll avoid at. As such in this house, we don't buy anything organic, ever, unless it's on sale or something and it's cheaper than alternatives. Primarily because organic is a non-logical false-standard based on marketing rather than science, and also because I love GMOs and I prefer food that's been made more efficiently.
Yes, I am one of those people who thinks humanity is more important than nature, but I do love nature and I do believe in climate change, but I also believe in bending it to the will of humanity instead of living like the first 10,000 years of "organic" agriculture that was full of mass starvation, blights, etc.
I love hiking in the woods/hills and such as well, I love forests in fact.
-
@tonyshowoff I could get into the whole part of meat production causing more greenhouse gas than all the cars on eath combined, how out current rate of meat intake per capita is up 3 fold in the last 100 years in the US. It is completely unsistainable and will cause us either slow down or stop meat production, or bulldose what is left of all of the worlds rainforest in favor of farm land, but I won't.
for me the idea of more veggies less meat made me feel better, healthier, and I felt like I was doing my little tiny part to cut back on my carbon footprint that I leave it the world. I also, grow my own veggies, live in less than a 1,300 sqft with plans on downsizing, and mow with a reel mower.I'm a darn hippie, but it makes me happy knowing that I am making a gnats fart of a difference in the world.
-
@s.hackleman Well, what you said is absolutely true and it is a concern of mine, and I often think about how there has to be a better way to do it. Unfortunately, I don't have the expertise, but fortunately I do have money and I do put investments into projects related to those ends.
However, agriculture of any kind is unsustainable, primarily because it destroys top soil, so even the most "sustainable agriculture" has a finite limit unless one finds ways to improve crop efficiency. In fact, human life in general is unsustainable, and so in general we've got a hell of a lot to do in the world.
Also farm land for meat production can't just be switched to plants, and in fact a lot of land that cows, pigs, etc can "grow" on, our crops cannot, at least not without genetic modification, though most of the people I've talked to who bring up what you do tend to be against that as well. Though also a lot of farm land would be regained that's currently being used to plant food for the animals on the other farm land. However too there's also a lot of farm land wasted on stuff like corn-based ethanol or just isn't farmed period in order to create artificial price controls.
I think for the most part we are both on the same page, but our desires and ends aren't exactly the same, but over all, the big picture of just not breaking down the entire planet is something that if worked at from either one of our perspectives could only be good. I'd hope you'd agree with that, even if you don't think what I want is as desirable or as necessary as what you do, because I feel the same, but opposite.
For me, veggies certainly help, but I'm really bad at eating them, because I'm just a picky eater, and I love really high (animal) fat foods, I smother my veggies in real butter, not only is it more filling, but it also gets me through to the other side. That and Tabasco sauce.
-
Here is Spain, most crop production is not done via the top soil but in greenhouses. Although that is causes its own problems.
-
There are entire countries in Africa where crop production is almost gone now because of GMO food. GMO food might be "more productive" but only by certain measurements. By others, it is unsustainable and has caused large portions of the world's crop production, in the regions most in need of it, to go fallow as it not only isn't self sustaining but destroys the natural crops as well.
Honestly, I think making a patented living thing should be a crime with penalties akin to murder. I truly believe anyone making GMOs should be taken out of society as what they are willing to do to people and our planet is unthinkable.
-
@tonyshowoff said:
For me, veggies certainly help, but I'm really bad at eating them, because I'm just a picky eater, and I love really high (animal) fat foods, I smother my veggies in real butter, not only is it more filling, but it also gets me through to the other side. That and Tabasco sauce.
How about sprinkling some parmesan cheese on them (little goes a long way). Tastes awesome and not as high fat as tons of butter. Another alternative Mrs. Dash for flavoring with a little spray Coconut oil or Olive oil.
-
@tonyshowoff I agree I think we are on the same side of the table. I would say we should sit down have a beer and a good old discussion about this where we both listen to each other, talk about it, and learn from each other. However, this is the internet so I will ignore your points and go on some huge off topic rant. (jk)
If you are ever in the middle of the US, I'd love to buy you that beer and we can discuss further.
-
The new thing in Spain is that they have outstripped the region's water supply as they grow to many fruits to ship to the rest of Europe they are effectively bottling water (inside the fruit) and loading it on trains and shipping it away. So the water is leaving Spain at a tremendous pace. They are out of water for crops, it is a major issue. Greenhouses limit water loss but the amount shipped out increases as the efficiency increases.
What they are looking at here is large scale Mediterranean desalinization to be able to keep the crop production up in the desert regions where the greenhouses do so well.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
There are entire countries in Africa where crop production is almost gone now because of GMO food. GMO food might be "more productive" but only by certain measurements. By others, it is unsustainable and has caused large portions of the world's crop production, in the regions most in need of it, to go fallow as it not only isn't self sustaining but destroys the natural crops as well.
Honestly, I think making a patented living thing should be a crime with penalties akin to murder. I truly believe anyone making GMOs should be taken out of society as what they are willing to do to people and our planet is unthinkable.
Bad farming practices destroy things way faster than any type of food, and planting the same things over and over has been known to be a bad idea in the US since the 1940s/50s, however in the developing world this isn't usually the case. I don't blame GMOs for those problems, but certainly one could blame the perception that the GMO crop was somehow capable of even the worse farming that lead to carelessness. If they did the same things with monocultural organic crops the same thing would've happened, especially if it's something that pulls nitrates out the soil like crazy, like corn.
Additionally the overuse of cloning constantly puts things on the edge of destruction.
A lot of what you say about GMOs sounds more like bad science coming out of anti-capitalist groups like Green Peace rather than reality. That isn't to say GMO is automatically good, in the same way large "organic" crops destroying the countryside with massive amounts of arsenic and other highly poisonous things.
Jumping to the conclusion that doing essentially the same thing as selective breeding, except faster is akin to murder is pretty alarmist and basically anti-science. In fact switching or off specific genes in a plant is more accurate than just regular selective breeding or pushing for genetic irregularities with radiation (more popular before GMOs, still used on wheat). Of course I'm not talking about wilder GMO attempts that have been made in labs and in test crops.
Bad farming practices and cloning have done a hell of lot more damage than any GMO, just look at the dust bawl, similar things still happen, just now anti-GMO people blame GMOs rather than the farmers.
-
@tonyshowoff said:
A lot of what you say about GMOs sounds more like bad science coming out of anti-capitalist groups like Green Peace rather than reality.
The issue is.... it does not produce the seeds that they need for the next crop. They have to buy them, but they can't afford them. So the GMO food produces far, far less. They get the first bit of GMO'd product for free, it replaces the self-reproducing varieties and then when they need more seeds, they have none. No BS here, very, very simple business practices. Sure, the base problem is that the farmers don't know enough to stay away from American handouts, but they don't understand that corn can reproduce until it is too late.
-
@tonyshowoff said:
Bad farming practices and cloning have done a hell of lot more damage than any GMO, just look at the dust bawl, similar things still happen, just now anti-GMO people blame GMOs rather than the farmers.
None of those eliminated whole crops in a single season. It's completely different.
-
@tonyshowoff said:
Jumping to the conclusion that doing essentially the same thing as selective breeding, except faster is akin to murder is pretty alarmist and basically anti-science.
You'll notice what I felt should put people in jail is patenting life.
-
@scottalanmiller Has that large reflective power generation system that uses steam taken off in Spain? I recall seeing a lot about that several years ago, but it seems fairly inefficient to me, but I don't know that much about it honestly, nuclear power on the other hand, well that's my wheel house, well sort of, after programming.
-
Keep this on topic guys. Start another thread to talk about farming if you want.
-
@tonyshowoff said:
@scottalanmiller Has that large reflective power generation system that uses steam taken off in Spain?
I haven't seen one, wind and hydro everywhere in the region I am in. It's mountains so those two are in abundance.
Reflective power to steam was in use in the US back when I was very little. I remember seeing it in elementary school. As far as I know, that works really well in desert areas. It's still built regularly.
-
@scottalanmiller said:
None of those eliminated whole crops in a single season. It's completely different.
That goes into what I was saying about clones, especially nothing but clones.
You'll notice what I felt should put people in jail is patenting life.
Sorry, I misread that, but I do agree there that is really bizarre and I've always thought so, especially when it got into the realm of moving beyond plants into animals and the sexist animal of all, human.
Anyway, don't get weight loss surgery. Boom now it's an on topic post
-
Just to give you my thoughts on the matter of weight loss, I think it's a hugely complicated situation that isn't completely explained yet.
Modern diet has created a lot of obesity that can't just be explained by saying that everyone has suddenly lost their will to stop eating.
There's a variety of factors that my reading shows play into it:
- The rise of processed food
- The rise of usage of high fructose corn syrup
- The hygiene hypothesis and it's effect on gut bacteria
- The influence of certain food chemicals on gut flora and how that impacts obesity
- The change in culture to a more sedentary one for most people
- The rise in usage of sugars of all kinds to make food more palatable
- The rise in usage of industrial seed oils to replace animal fats and healthful vegetable oils
- The rise in inflammatory diseases linked to many of the above factors
- Metabolic syndrome caused by increase in usage of certain plastics and the associated hormonal imbalances
- The rise in use of GMOs - the jury is still out on this one. I know there is a lot of research saying GMOs don't make people less healthy than non-GMOs, but they are only comparing that to a regular unhealthy modern diet, for the most part.
- The rise in usage of pesticides
- The changes to various staple foods through non-GMO means, such as breeding wheat to have more gluten and other changes
- The decrease in consumption of naturally fermented foods, such as sourdough being replaced by fast rising yeast breads
- Decrease in consumption of fish oils and other healthy oils leading to an imbalance of Omega 3 and Omega 6 levels
- Possible Vitamin D deficiency from less time outside and poor diet
- Mineral depletion in food from modern farming practices
The fact that all of these have occurred together makes it incredibly hard to tease out just which of these are important, and how much they each contribute. Or to find out if it is a combination of all of the above and the synergies of them working in concert.
That being said, my personal experience is that a combination of exercise, diet, good probiotic practices, and moving to a more whole foods and lower carb eating style can help almost anyone to drop some weight and improve their long term prospects.
-
@Nic
I'd like some further clarification on some of the things you said, plus also I've mixed in some of my own opinions and I hope you humour me with reading them.- The rise of processed food
How is processed food bad? Most food is processed, except raw fruits and vegetables. Even organic stuff, I mean look at anything based on soy, or things like almond milk, etc. Unless this an Americanism I'm unfamiliar with that refers to some sort of specific process.
- The rise of usage of high fructose corn syrup
This breaks down the same way as regular sugar, but if you mean it's bad in the sense that it's much easier to consume way more of it, then I agree with you here.
#3 and #4 about gut flora
I've read a lot that this likely also has a huge influence on why so many people are so damn allergic to everything today, that and not going outside.
- The change in culture to a more sedentary one for most people
People bring up this one a lot, but consider that there were lawyers, bank tellers, accountants, etc who were essentially equally as sedentary way back when as now. The primary difference is, from what I've read, is that people consume about 500 more calories per day on average, but also about 150g - 200g more carbohydrates, i.e. sugar.
- The rise in usage of sugars of all kinds to make food more palatable
What's funny about this is that this usually happens because they remove the fat, because fat is considered bad, so they just put more sugar in it.
7 and 8
This is definitely one, as I've read some that would suggest hydrogenated oils which are promoted as being more healthy can actually inflame the cardiovascular system in similar manner to smoking
- Metabolic syndrome caused by increase in usage of certain plastics and the associated hormonal imbalances
I've not seen much direct hard evidence of this, and usually the hormonal imbalances associated with this and also bovine hormones for milk are more aptly explained by the rise in obesity.
- GMOs
The jury really isn't out on GMOs, they can grow more food, in less space, for cheaper, and they're controlling genes that already exist in the plants (for approved foods, not experimental examples often cited which people aren't even eating), they're also tested for sometimes years before approval, when organic cross breeding has no approval process so the suggested dangers of accidental allergens, etc are more realistically risky in organic farming than GMO farming.
There's a lot of fear mongering about this and it seems to be more related to "natural" is good, even though selective breeding over a long period of time can also create similar results, there just isn't enough time, both from a capitalist perspective and also from a 7+ billion people eating perspective. However, I will say the lack of diversity is an issue, as even the cloned banana sits on the edge of being destroyed by a fungus because they're all the same. Getting rid of gene patenting, I think, would encourage diversity since there'd be no benefit to fitting within a patent.
- The rise in usage of pesticides
There's no choice here either, before modern pesticides even the Netherlands had famines, thank science those days are gone, now they're some of the fattest people in Europe.
- The changes to various staple foods through non-GMO means, such as breeding wheat to have more gluten and other changes
This is another necessary thing, because without it many people would starve, and would have starved if not for these advancements. However, I contend this is more dangerous than GMOs. With GMOs we know what genes we're turning off and on, but with radiation + cross breeding, it's even more shooting in the dark, and could definitely cause allergy problems, especially with how sensative people are now.
- The decrease in consumption of naturally fermented foods, such as sourdough being replaced by fast rising yeast breads
OMFG, I love sourdough bread, I hate that I'm off bread mostly, but when I do eat it, and it's not pizza, it's sourdough. Great, now I can't stop thinking about sourdough.
- Decrease in consumption of fish oils and other healthy oils leading to an imbalance of Omega 3 and Omega 6 levels
Agreed, supplements help, and also they've found ways to get it into eggs, but the problem is that people often consider eggs to be some sort of heart attack pill, but eating wheat bread is fine. If the modern diet was better, I can't imagine even people who "eat healthy" would be so unhealthy, compared to people who used to "eat unhealthy" being healthier than people today. Seems sorta backwards.
- Possible Vitamin D deficiency from less time outside and poor diet
When I was a kid people would come to my school and give us some sort of milk with tons of vitamin D in it. Anyway, I take supplements today, but skin tone has a lot to do with ability to intake Vitamin D.
- Mineral depletion in food from modern farming practices
Ironically things like wheat flour have tons of things added now, especially in the US to make up for what's lost/lacking elsewhere.
That being said, my personal experience is that a combination of exercise, diet, good probiotic practices, and moving to a more whole foods and lower carb eating style can help almost anyone to drop some weight and improve their long term prospects.
I agree with you on lower carb for sure (see my story post above), but suggesting exercise and diet is unclear, especially because exercise to most people means things like running and walking which are very crappy ways to burn calories, instead of lifting weights which works a lot better. Second when it comes to diet, a lot of people consider the food pyramid/plate/whatever to be the best, but that's about 300g of carbs per day, when even for a lot of people 100g is probably too much, and also not enough protein.
-
Speaking of not processing things. One of the things that they do in much of the US is put crap in the water. We get to drink right out of the mountain streams here! Best water ever.
