ML
    • Recent
    • Categories
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Converting MKVs to MP4: Would This Decrease File Size?

    IT Discussion
    8
    32
    4.5k
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • thanksajdotcomT
      thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
      last edited by

      @scottalanmiller said:

      Handbreak them and change the size of the file that way.

      That's what I'm hearing overall.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
      • NicN
        Nic
        last edited by

        MKV is still used a lot - it's a more versatile container.

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
        • DashrenderD
          Dashrender
          last edited by

          What makes one container better than another?

          thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • thanksajdotcomT
            thanksajdotcom @Dashrender
            last edited by

            @Dashrender said:

            What makes one container better than another?

            That's also one of my questions.

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
            • thanksajdotcomT
              thanksajdotcom
              last edited by

              Compatibility, especially cross-platform, I'm guessing.

              DashrenderD 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • DashrenderD
                Dashrender @thanksajdotcom
                last edited by

                @thanksajdotcom said:

                Compatibility, especially cross-platform, I'm guessing.

                I'd like a bit more information than that.. 🙂

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • ?
                  A Former User
                  last edited by

                  Compatibility. Mp4 is more compatbible. Almost all non theather release deliverables are done in the mp4 wrapper. The only down side is it requires a licsence to use it. Mkv is open source but not well adopted.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • NicN
                    Nic
                    last edited by

                    MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

                    ? coliverC thanksajdotcomT 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • ?
                      A Former User @Nic
                      last edited by A Former User

                      @Nic said:

                      MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

                      So now we know where AJ got these torrent-ed files..

                      JaredBuschJ thanksajdotcomT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 0
                      • JaredBuschJ
                        JaredBusch @A Former User
                        last edited by

                        @thecreativeone91 said:

                        @Nic said:

                        MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

                        So now we know where AJ got these torrent-ed files..

                        Already known as he has posted about it blatantly more than once.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • coliverC
                          coliver @Nic
                          last edited by

                          @Nic said:

                          MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

                          I've gotten MKVs from some legitimate sources... but since it is a FOSS alternative it is being used to package a lot of pirated media.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • tonyshowoffT
                            tonyshowoff
                            last edited by

                            I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                            scottalanmillerS thanksajdotcomT 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 4
                            • thanksajdotcomT
                              thanksajdotcom @Nic
                              last edited by

                              @Nic said:

                              MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

                              This is true...quite true.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • scottalanmillerS
                                scottalanmiller @tonyshowoff
                                last edited by

                                @tonyshowoff said:

                                I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                                More like brutally destroying the quality.

                                ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                • thanksajdotcomT
                                  thanksajdotcom @A Former User
                                  last edited by

                                  @thecreativeone91 said:

                                  @Nic said:

                                  MKV is pretty well adopted in piracy circles 🙂

                                  So now we know where AJ got these torrent-ed files..

                                  Not denying nor admitting to anything...

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • scottalanmillerS
                                    scottalanmiller
                                    last edited by

                                    Bigger drive is definitely the better answer. Not free, but drive space is pretty cheap and a permanent solution. Doing handbreak work requires a tremendous amount of disk and CPU resources. I've done this a lot for my own movie collection compression and the amount of time and effort that it takes is absolutely crazy.

                                    thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                    • thanksajdotcomT
                                      thanksajdotcom @tonyshowoff
                                      last edited by

                                      @tonyshowoff said:

                                      I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                                      You did? I don't see the response, unless I'm just not recognizing your handle over there.

                                      ? 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • ?
                                        A Former User @scottalanmiller
                                        last edited by

                                        @scottalanmiller said:

                                        @tonyshowoff said:

                                        I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                                        More like brutally destroying the quality.

                                        Especially considering the source. They likely have been transcoded a few times already.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • ?
                                          A Former User @thanksajdotcom
                                          last edited by

                                          @thanksajdotcom said:

                                          @tonyshowoff said:

                                          I answered this on Spiceworks already, but for the sake of cross posting since you did, I will say again: get a new drive, lowering quality is always a terrible idea, you can't go from lossy to lossy without destroying quality.

                                          You did? I don't see the response, unless I'm just not recognizing your handle over there.

                                          Then you didn't read the content of them.

                                          thanksajdotcomT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • thanksajdotcomT
                                            thanksajdotcom @scottalanmiller
                                            last edited by

                                            @scottalanmiller said:

                                            Bigger drive is definitely the better answer. Not free, but drive space is pretty cheap and a permanent solution. Doing handbreak work requires a tremendous amount of disk and CPU resources. I've done this a lot for my own movie collection compression and the amount of time and effort that it takes is absolutely crazy.

                                            I have a non-NAS external drive I ordered a power cord for. The original got lost somehow. I'm going to network it via the USB port on the other NAS, as I have a WD MyPassport (500GB) being used by the main NAS. I think the Seagate GoFlex that I'm doing this with is 2TB, but it may be 3. It'll be a good landing platform for the compressed/multi-archive downloads I get that I then extract onto the final destination.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • 1
                                            • 2
                                            • 1 / 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post